Specs Don't Lie. Compare Now.
Put any two phones head-to-head and see the real winner — Display, Camera, Battery, Performance and Price, matched spec-for-spec so you can decide with facts, not marketing.
Infinix Hot 50 Pro Plus vs Infinix Hot 70 Pro
| Specification | Infinix Hot 50 Pro Plus | Infinix Hot 70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Hot 50 Pro Plus | Infinix Hot 70 Pro |
| Brand | infinix | infinix |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 52000 | 85000 |
| Price India | 17000 | 27000 |
| Price USD | $170 | $290 |
| Price USA | 170 | 290 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 128 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 6.8 mm | 166.9 x 79.5 x 7.9 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.76 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1080 x 2436 Pixels | 1080 x 2344 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Peak Brightness | 1300 nits | Not Confirm |
| HBM Brightness | 550 Nits | 950 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Helio G100 | Dimensity 7100 |
| Lithography Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex A76 | 4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 585 K | 790 K |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8+ 256 GB | 8 + 128 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | Yes | Yes |
| Variants | 8 + 128 GB | 6 + 128GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Not Confirm | 50 M = Sony IMX882 |
| Zoom | No | No |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | 10 X |
| Video Recording | 2K @ 30 fps | 2K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | LED Flash | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = Not Confirm | – |
| Front Resolution | 4200 x 3100 pixels | 3,266 × 2,449 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 2K @ 30 fps | 2K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 5000 mAH | 6000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Lithium-Polymer | Lithium-Polymer |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | - | Not confirm |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | Not confirm |
| Charging Time | Not Confirm | 50-70 minutes (0 To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6880 | X6896 |
| Release Date | 1 November, 2026 | 16 July, 2026 |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Hot Series | Hot Series |
| Category | Mid-range | Budget |
| Android OS | Android 14, up to 1 major OS updates | Android 17, (2 major upgrades) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 162 g | 204 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame & Back ) | Frame And Back ( Plastic ) |
| Special Features | — | Active Matrix Cube / RGB Halo lighting on the back side , It can provide notification and ambient lighting effects. |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Side Mounted |
| Other Sensors | – Proximity sensor | – Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | Slim Premium Design ✅ |
|
| Cons | No NFC ❌ |
|
| Best For | Smooth Display Experience 🎯 |
|
| Not Best For | Professional Photography 🚫 |
|
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about comparing phones on FSL Specs.
Just search and select any two phones from our database — the tool instantly lines up their specs side by side and highlights which device wins in each category, from display to battery.
Yes. Every spec is cross-verified across multiple trusted sources before it's published, and anything not officially confirmed by the brand is clearly labeled "Not Confirmed."
The tool is built for a clean two-phone, head-to-head comparison so the differences are easy to read at a glance, without a cluttered multi-column table.
We follow a strict multi-source research process, checking official brand listings alongside independent spec databases and lab-tested benchmarks before publishing any figure.
Unreleased or rumored phones may have some fields marked "Not Confirmed" until an official announcement — we'd rather flag uncertainty than guess and mislead you.
Absolutely — that's the whole point. Compare a Xiaomi against a Samsung, a Tecno against an iPhone, or anything else in our database, brand doesn't limit the matchup.
Where available, pricing is shown across multiple currencies so you can gauge value in your own market rather than relying on a single regional price.
Our editorial team regularly audits published spec pages and updates entries whenever new official information, price changes, or corrections come in.
It depends on your priorities — gamers should focus on processor and RAM, photographers on camera sensors, and everyday users on battery life and display quality. Our tool highlights all of them so nothing gets missed.
Yes — pick your current phone as one side of the comparison to see exactly what you'd gain or lose by switching to another model.
Completely free, with no sign-up required — compare as many phones as you like, whenever you like.
Yes — each row is visually marked to show the stronger value, and specs that are equal between both phones are grouped so you can spot real differences instantly.
Yes, each comparison generates its own shareable URL, so you can send an exact side-by-side matchup straight to a friend or group chat.
It means the brand hasn't officially confirmed that particular detail yet — we'd rather label it honestly than present a rumor as fact.
We verify every figure across multiple sources before publishing, we're upfront when something is unconfirmed, and we build every comparison around the belief that specs — not brand names — should decide your next phone.










