Infinix Note Edge vs Oppo Reno 11F
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note Edge
- + 4.1x better Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 1100 nits)
- + 78% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs 900 nits)
- + 30% larger Battery (6500 mAH vs 5000 mAh)
- + 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2412 Pixels)
- + Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 11F
- + 2.5x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 49% higher Charging Watts (67 W vs 45 W)
- + 28% higher Camera (64 + 8 MP vs 50 MP)
- + 8% higher Max Clock (2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz)
- + 7% lighter Weight (177 g vs 190 grams)
- + 5% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (840 K vs 800 K)
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- + Higher Video Recording: 4K @ 30 fps 1080p @ 30/60/480 fps vs 2K@30 fps 1080p@ 30/60 fps
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K @ 30 fps 1080p @ 30 fps vs 2K@30 fps 1080p@30/60 fps
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note Edge | Oppo Reno 11F |
| Brand | infinix | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 82000 PKR | 78000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹29000 | ₹26000 |
| Price USA | $290 | $270 |
| Variants Prices | 8+ 128GB = 72,000 PKR | 250 $ | 25,000 INR | 8 + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.4 x 7.2 mm | 161.1 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.7 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2412 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 1100 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 900 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | Dimensity 7050 |
| Lithography Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 | 2 x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 800 K | 840 K |
| Bootup Time | 25s | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Yes | Yes |
| Variants | 6+ 128GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 MP | 64 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 9248 × 6936 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = GalaxyCore GC50D1 | 64 MP = Omnivision OV64B 8 MP = Sony IMX355 |
| Zoom | - | - |
| Digital Zoom | - | - |
| Video Recording | 2K@30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = Not confirm | 32 MP = Sony IMX709 |
| Front Resolution | 4,160 x 3,120 Pixels | 6528 x 3680 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 2K@30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Not Confirm |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 5000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Si-Carbon Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | - |
| Charging Time | 75-85m (0% To 100%) | 45-50 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6887 | CPH2603 |
| Release Date | 31 January, 2026 | 8 February, 2024 |
| Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Series Name | Note Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 | Android 14 > |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 190 grams | 177 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Frame And Back ( Plastic ) |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back, Curve Display |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Dual Nano SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Single Mono Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Big battery 🔋 (6500mAh) | ✅ Vibrant AMOLED display — 120Hz, HDR10+ 📱✨ |
| Cons | ❌ No expandable 🚫 (storage fixed) | ❌ Plastic build quality — plastic rear/frame 🏗️ |
| Best For | ✅ Battery lovers 🔋 | 🎯 Camera-focused users 📸 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Pro photography 📸 | 🚫 Wireless charging fans 🔌 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | — | vivo V40e |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











