Specs Don't Lie. Compare Now.
Put any two phones head-to-head and see the real winner — Display, Camera, Battery, Performance and Price, matched spec-for-spec so you can decide with facts, not marketing.
Samsung Galaxy M47 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M47 | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Samsung Galaxy M47 | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra |
| Brand | Samsung | Tecno |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 95000 | 120000 |
| Price India | 35000 | 38000 |
| Price USD | $350 | $420 |
| Price USA | 350 | 420 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 256 GB _______________________________ | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 78.2 x 8.1 mm | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1080 x 2340 Pixels | 1208 x 2644 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Super AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 1400 nits | 2400 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~800 nits | 1300 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Dimensity 7400 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | — | 900 K |
| Bootup Time | Not Confirm | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 256 GB | 12+256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Variants | 6 + 128 GB | 8 + 256GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 5 + 2 MP | 50+50+8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony IMX882 | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown |
| Zoom | Not Confirm | 3 x |
| Digital Zoom | 10 x | - |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 12 MP = Not Confirm | 50 MP=Unknown |
| Front Resolution | 4000 × 3000 Pixels | 8160 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 1080 @ 30 fps | 4K@ 60 fps |
| Front Flash | - | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6000 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | Not Confirm | 11h 23m |
| Charging Time | Not Confirm | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | SM-M476B | - |
| Release Date | 4 July, 2026 | 2 March, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | M Series | Camon Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 16, up to 6 major OS updates, One UI 8.5 | Android 17, HiOS 17 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 178 g |
| Build | Plastic frame , Glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+) | glass back , plastic frame |
| Special Features | — | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Single Mono Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | Super AMOLED Display ✅ | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) |
| Cons | Only 6GB RAM ❌ | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) |
| Best For | Media Consumption 🎬 | ✅ Mobile Photography |
| Not Best For | Heavy Gaming 🎮 | ❌ Budget Buyers |
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about comparing phones on FSL Specs.
Just search and select any two phones from our database — the tool instantly lines up their specs side by side and highlights which device wins in each category, from display to battery.
Yes. Every spec is cross-verified across multiple trusted sources before it's published, and anything not officially confirmed by the brand is clearly labeled "Not Confirmed."
The tool is built for a clean two-phone, head-to-head comparison so the differences are easy to read at a glance, without a cluttered multi-column table.
We follow a strict multi-source research process, checking official brand listings alongside independent spec databases and lab-tested benchmarks before publishing any figure.
Unreleased or rumored phones may have some fields marked "Not Confirmed" until an official announcement — we'd rather flag uncertainty than guess and mislead you.
Absolutely — that's the whole point. Compare a Xiaomi against a Samsung, a Tecno against an iPhone, or anything else in our database, brand doesn't limit the matchup.
Where available, pricing is shown across multiple currencies so you can gauge value in your own market rather than relying on a single regional price.
Our editorial team regularly audits published spec pages and updates entries whenever new official information, price changes, or corrections come in.
It depends on your priorities — gamers should focus on processor and RAM, photographers on camera sensors, and everyday users on battery life and display quality. Our tool highlights all of them so nothing gets missed.
Yes — pick your current phone as one side of the comparison to see exactly what you'd gain or lose by switching to another model.
Completely free, with no sign-up required — compare as many phones as you like, whenever you like.
Yes — each row is visually marked to show the stronger value, and specs that are equal between both phones are grouped so you can spot real differences instantly.
Yes, each comparison generates its own shareable URL, so you can send an exact side-by-side matchup straight to a friend or group chat.
It means the brand hasn't officially confirmed that particular detail yet — we'd rather label it honestly than present a rumor as fact.
We verify every figure across multiple sources before publishing, we're upfront when something is unconfirmed, and we build every comparison around the belief that specs — not brand names — should decide your next phone.











