Specs Don't Lie. Compare Now.
Put any two phones head-to-head and see the real winner — Display, Camera, Battery, Performance and Price, matched spec-for-spec so you can decide with facts, not marketing.
Tecno Spark 40 Pro vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
| Specification | Tecno Spark 40 Pro | Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Spark 40 Pro | Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus |
| Brand | Tecno | Tecno |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 59000 | 62000 |
| Price India | 18500 | 19500 |
| Price USD | $190 | $200 |
| Price USA | 190 | 200 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = 59,000 PKR | 190 $ | 18,500 INR | 8 + 256GB = 19,500 INR | 200 $ | 62,000 PKR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 6.7 mm | 163.9 × 75.8 × 6.49 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1224 × 2720 Pixels | 1224 × 2720 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 Nits | 4500 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 Nits | 1600 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Helio G100 | Helio G200 |
| Lithography Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 | 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 (1.1 GHz) | Mali-G57 MC2 (1.1 GHz) |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 410 K | 450 K |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | Yes | Not Confirm |
| Variants | 8 + 128 GB 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 128 GB 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | – | 50 MP = Hynix HI5022Q |
| Zoom | - | - |
| Digital Zoom | 10 x | - |
| Video Recording | 2K@ 30 fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Front Resolution | 4608 × 3456 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 2K@ 30 fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | No | 30 W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | No | 5 W |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | - |
| Charging Time | 50-55 Mints (0-100%) | 50-55 Mints (0-100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | KM6 | KM7 |
| Release Date | 7 July, 2026 | 2 July, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Spark Series | Spark Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 Now | Android 17, HiOS 17 ( 1 Android upgrades Remains ) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 160 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) |
| Special Features | – | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ | 4G / 4G+ |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED Display | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED Display |
| Cons | ❌ No 5G Support | ❌ No 5G Support |
| Best For | ✅ Smooth Display Lovers | ✅ Smooth Display Lovers |
| Not Best For | ❌ 5G Network Users | ❌ 5G Network Users |
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about comparing phones on FSL Specs.
Just search and select any two phones from our database — the tool instantly lines up their specs side by side and highlights which device wins in each category, from display to battery.
Yes. Every spec is cross-verified across multiple trusted sources before it's published, and anything not officially confirmed by the brand is clearly labeled "Not Confirmed."
The tool is built for a clean two-phone, head-to-head comparison so the differences are easy to read at a glance, without a cluttered multi-column table.
We follow a strict multi-source research process, checking official brand listings alongside independent spec databases and lab-tested benchmarks before publishing any figure.
Unreleased or rumored phones may have some fields marked "Not Confirmed" until an official announcement — we'd rather flag uncertainty than guess and mislead you.
Absolutely — that's the whole point. Compare a Xiaomi against a Samsung, a Tecno against an iPhone, or anything else in our database, brand doesn't limit the matchup.
Where available, pricing is shown across multiple currencies so you can gauge value in your own market rather than relying on a single regional price.
Our editorial team regularly audits published spec pages and updates entries whenever new official information, price changes, or corrections come in.
It depends on your priorities — gamers should focus on processor and RAM, photographers on camera sensors, and everyday users on battery life and display quality. Our tool highlights all of them so nothing gets missed.
Yes — pick your current phone as one side of the comparison to see exactly what you'd gain or lose by switching to another model.
Completely free, with no sign-up required — compare as many phones as you like, whenever you like.
Yes — each row is visually marked to show the stronger value, and specs that are equal between both phones are grouped so you can spot real differences instantly.
Yes, each comparison generates its own shareable URL, so you can send an exact side-by-side matchup straight to a friend or group chat.
It means the brand hasn't officially confirmed that particular detail yet — we'd rather label it honestly than present a rumor as fact.
We verify every figure across multiple sources before publishing, we're upfront when something is unconfirmed, and we build every comparison around the belief that specs — not brand names — should decide your next phone.









