Specs Don't Lie. Compare Now.
Put any two phones head-to-head and see the real winner — Display, Camera, Battery, Performance and Price, matched spec-for-spec so you can decide with facts, not marketing.
Vivo X200 FE vs vivo x300
| Specification | Vivo X200 FE | vivo x300 |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Vivo X200 FE | vivo x300 |
| Brand | Vivo | Vivo |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 195000 | 320000 |
| Price India | 55000 | 98000 |
| Price USD | $560 | $980 |
| Price USA | 560 | 980 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB 16 + 512 GB | 16 + 512 GB =280,000 | 870 $ | 86,000 INR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 150.8 × 71.8 × 8.0 mm | 150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.31 inch | 6.31 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1216 × 2640 Pixels | 1216 x 2640 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO Amoled | LTPO Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 5000 nits | 4500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~1800 nits | 1600 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9300+ | Dimensity 9500 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.21 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 × 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 | 1 x 4.21 GHz (C1-Ultra) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Arm/Mali G1-Ultra |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.3 M | 3.4 M |
| Bootup Time | Not Confirm | 21s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 512 GB | 16 + 1 TB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 8 MP | 200 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 16,320 × 12,240 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP= Sony IMX882 | 200 MP= Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Digital Zoom | 100 x | 100 X |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 4K @30/60/120fps |
| Flash | - | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Samsung S5KJN1 | 50 MP = Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 60 fps | 4K@ 30/60fps |
| Front Flash | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6040 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | No | 40 W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 15 hours |
| Charging Time | 50-60 mints ( 0-100%) | 50m-60m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | V2503 | V2509A |
| Release Date | 5 July, 2026 | 13 October, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Vivo X Series | Vivo X Series |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 Now | Android 17, OriginOS 7 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 226g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back | Aluminum Frame And Glass Back |
| Special Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ |
| WiFi | WiFi 7 (802.11be) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Compact flagship body 📱 150.8×71.8×8mm, 186g | ✅ Zeiss Cameras |
| Cons | ❌ No expandable storage 🗂️ no microSD card slot | ❌ No Telephoto (if standard X300 lacks periscope lens) |
| Best For | 🎯 Compact phone lovers 🤏 | ✅ Mobile Photography |
| Not Best For | 🚫 MicroSD storage needs 🗂️ | ❌ Budget Buyers |
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about comparing phones on FSL Specs.
Just search and select any two phones from our database — the tool instantly lines up their specs side by side and highlights which device wins in each category, from display to battery.
Yes. Every spec is cross-verified across multiple trusted sources before it's published, and anything not officially confirmed by the brand is clearly labeled "Not Confirmed."
The tool is built for a clean two-phone, head-to-head comparison so the differences are easy to read at a glance, without a cluttered multi-column table.
We follow a strict multi-source research process, checking official brand listings alongside independent spec databases and lab-tested benchmarks before publishing any figure.
Unreleased or rumored phones may have some fields marked "Not Confirmed" until an official announcement — we'd rather flag uncertainty than guess and mislead you.
Absolutely — that's the whole point. Compare a Xiaomi against a Samsung, a Tecno against an iPhone, or anything else in our database, brand doesn't limit the matchup.
Where available, pricing is shown across multiple currencies so you can gauge value in your own market rather than relying on a single regional price.
Our editorial team regularly audits published spec pages and updates entries whenever new official information, price changes, or corrections come in.
It depends on your priorities — gamers should focus on processor and RAM, photographers on camera sensors, and everyday users on battery life and display quality. Our tool highlights all of them so nothing gets missed.
Yes — pick your current phone as one side of the comparison to see exactly what you'd gain or lose by switching to another model.
Completely free, with no sign-up required — compare as many phones as you like, whenever you like.
Yes — each row is visually marked to show the stronger value, and specs that are equal between both phones are grouped so you can spot real differences instantly.
Yes, each comparison generates its own shareable URL, so you can send an exact side-by-side matchup straight to a friend or group chat.
It means the brand hasn't officially confirmed that particular detail yet — we'd rather label it honestly than present a rumor as fact.
We verify every figure across multiple sources before publishing, we're upfront when something is unconfirmed, and we build every comparison around the belief that specs — not brand names — should decide your next phone.











