Introduction

The Tensor G3 vs Dimensity 9000 vs Exynos 2200 comparison brings together three flagship-class processors with different CPU architectures and multimedia capabilities.

Google Tensor G3 was announced in October 2023 and uses Samsung’s 4nm manufacturing process. It has a nine-core CPU built around Cortex-X3, Cortex-A715 and Cortex-A510 cores, together with Mali-G715 MP7 graphics. MediaTek Dimensity 9000 arrived in November 2021, using TSMC’s 4nm process, a Cortex-X2 CPU and Mali-G710 MP10 graphics. Samsung Exynos 2200 launched in January 2022 with a Cortex-X2 CPU, Xclipse 920 graphics based on AMD RDNA 2 and Samsung’s 4nm process.

NanoReview’s overall ratings are 56 for Tensor G3, 55 for Dimensity 9000 and 53 for Exynos 2200. The scores are close, but the category results differ: Tensor G3 leads gaming, Dimensity 9000 offers the best battery rating and AnTuTu result, while Exynos 2200 has a strong GPU compute result and advanced listed video-recording capabilities.

Quick Answer

The Google Tensor G3 is the overall winner according to NanoReview, scoring 56 compared with 55 for MediaTek Dimensity 9000 and 53 for Samsung Exynos 2200. Tensor G3 leads the gaming rating and Geekbench CPU performance, Dimensity 9000 leads AnTuTu 11 and battery efficiency, and Exynos 2200 offers strong graphics benchmark results and 8K video recording.

Specification Comparison

Source: NanoReview’s processor specification pages. Missing specifications mean that the source does not list an equivalent value.

CPU Architecture and Performance

Tensor G3 and Dimensity 9000 tie on NanoReview’s CPU rating, while Tensor G3 records the higher Geekbench 6 results.

Tensor G3 uses one Cortex-X3 core at 2.91GHz, four Cortex-A715 cores at 2.37GHz and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores at 1.7GHz. Its nine-core configuration uses ARMv9-A and is manufactured by Samsung on a 4nm process. This design balances a high-performance prime core with two additional core groups for different workload demands.

Dimensity 9000 uses one Cortex-X2 core at 3.05GHz, three Cortex-A710 cores at 2.85GHz and four Cortex-A510 cores at 1.8GHz. Its 8MB L3 cache is the largest listed among these three processors. The design uses ARMv9-A and TSMC’s 4nm process.

Exynos 2200 has one Cortex-X2 prime core at 2.8GHz, three Cortex-A710 cores at 2.52GHz and four Cortex-A510 cores at 1.82GHz. It has a listed 4MB L3 cache. Its prime-core frequency is lower than Dimensity 9000’s, while the overall CPU architecture remains similar in concept.

NanoReview gives 55 CPU points to Tensor G3, 55 to Dimensity 9000 and 51 to Exynos 2200. Geekbench 6 results favor Tensor G3, at 1,722 single-core and 4,458 multi-core, compared with 1,693 and 4,384 for Dimensity 9000. Exynos 2200 records 1,588 single-core and 3,958 multi-core.

The CPU ratings and benchmarks tell a consistent story: Tensor G3 is marginally ahead in the reported Geekbench measurements, Dimensity 9000 is close behind, and Exynos 2200 trails the other two in CPU performance.

GPU and Gaming Performance

Tensor G3 leads NanoReview’s gaming rating, while its theoretical GPU throughput is also higher than that listed for the other two processors.

Tensor G3 uses Mali-G715 MP7 graphics, listed at 1594.8 GFLOPS. Dimensity 9000 uses Mali-G710 MP10 at 1085.4 GFLOPS, while Exynos 2200 integrates the Xclipse 920 GPU based on AMD RDNA 2, listed at 1003 GFLOPS.

NanoReview’s gaming ratings are:

Tensor G3 leads the gaming rating, but the margin over Exynos 2200 is small. The current 3DMark Steel Nomad Light results also favor Tensor G3 at 982, compared with 900 for Exynos 2200 and 775 for Dimensity 9000. Exynos 2200 nevertheless scores 3,972 in Solar Bay, demonstrating that the results vary by graphics workload.

These differences matter because theoretical FLOPS do not translate directly into frame rates. Graphics architecture, driver quality, rendering APIs, game-specific optimization and thermal management all influence real-world gaming performance.

Tensor G3 is the winner by NanoReview’s gaming rating, but individual game performance can vary by device. Cooling and software optimization are particularly important during extended gaming sessions.

Manufacturing and Battery Efficiency

Dimensity 9000 leads NanoReview’s battery score at 91, followed by Tensor G3 at 90 and Exynos 2200 at 86.

All three processors use a nominal 4nm process, but their manufacturers differ. Tensor G3 and Exynos 2200 are manufactured by Samsung, while TSMC manufactures Dimensity 9000. The published battery scores are 90 for Tensor G3, 91 for Dimensity 9000 and 86 for Exynos 2200.

Dimensity 9000 therefore has the best battery rating of these three. This does not guarantee that every phone using it will outlast every Tensor G3 or Exynos 2200 device. Battery capacity, screen size, signal quality, operating system and power limits affect real-world runtime.

The one-point difference between Tensor G3 and Dimensity 9000 is small. The clearer result is that Exynos 2200 has the lowest battery score in this comparison.

RAM, Memory and Storage

Tensor G3 has the highest listed memory bandwidth, while Dimensity 9000 and Exynos 2200 support more maximum RAM.

Tensor G3 supports LPDDR5X memory at 4266MHz with a maximum bandwidth of 68.2GB/s and up to 16GB RAM. Its listed storage options include UFS 3.1 and UFS 4.0.

Dimensity 9000 uses LPDDR5X at 3750MHz, providing 60GB/s bandwidth and support for up to 24GB RAM. Its listed storage standard is UFS 3.1.

Exynos 2200 uses LPDDR5 at 3200MHz, with 51.2GB/s bandwidth and up to 24GB RAM. It also lists UFS 3.1 storage.

Tensor G3 therefore offers the highest listed memory bandwidth, whereas the two MediaTek and Samsung chips support a greater maximum RAM capacity. Actual performance depends on the memory and storage components used in a specific smartphone.

AI and NPU

All three processors include dedicated AI hardware, but NanoReview does not provide directly comparable TOPS figures to determine an AI-performance winner.

Tensor G3 has a dedicated NPU, Dimensity 9000 uses the MediaTek APU 590, and Exynos 2200 includes a neural processing unit. The cited NanoReview pages do not provide equivalent AI throughput figures for all three.

Consequently, a numerical AI ranking would be unsupported. Practical AI performance depends on model compatibility, precision, memory requirements, framework support and how effectively applications use the CPU, GPU and NPU together.

Tensor G3 is designed for Google’s Pixel platform and its software features, but the availability and speed of specific AI functions depend on the device and its software.

Camera, ISP and Video

Tensor G3 and Exynos 2200 share the strongest listed video-recording capability, while Dimensity 9000 supports the highest maximum camera resolution.

Tensor G3 supports camera hardware up to 200MP and video recording at 8K30 and 4K120. Exynos 2200 also lists up to 200MP camera support, 8K30 capture and 4K120 recording. Dimensity 9000 supports camera hardware up to 320MP, but its maximum listed video recording is 4K60.

This makes Tensor G3 and Exynos 2200 the winners for maximum listed video-capture capability, while Dimensity 9000 has the highest sensor-resolution limit.

The maximum megapixel figure does not determine actual image quality. Sensor size, optics, stabilization, image signal processing, HDR implementation and the smartphone manufacturer’s camera software all affect the result.

Display and Connectivity

Tensor G3 has the newest listed wireless standards, while Exynos 2200 has the highest listed peak 5G download speed.

Tensor G3 supports display resolution up to 3840×2160 and lists peak 5G download and upload speeds of 7.3Gbps and 3.7Gbps. It supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3.

Dimensity 9000 lists a maximum display resolution of 3200×1440, up to 7Gbps download and 2.5Gbps upload, Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3.

Exynos 2200 supports displays up to 3840×2160 and lists download speeds up to 7.35Gbps and upload up to 3.67Gbps. It supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2.

Exynos 2200 therefore has the highest listed peak download speed, narrowly ahead of Tensor G3. Tensor G3 offers Wi-Fi 7, making it the more modern option for wireless networking standards.

Benchmark Comparison

Dimensity 9000 leads AnTuTu 11, Tensor G3 leads Geekbench CPU and Steel Nomad Light, and Exynos 2200 has a strong Solar Bay result.

Source: NanoReview’s current processor pages. Geekbench GPU Compute scores use Vulkan for Tensor G3 and Exynos 2200, but OpenCL for Dimensity 9000, so this row is not a fully comparable ranking.

Dimensity 9000 leads AnTuTu 11 with 1,504,467, compared with 1,434,169 for Exynos 2200 and 1,409,016 for Tensor G3. However, Tensor G3 leads the available Geekbench CPU tests by a modest margin. Exynos 2200 has the highest listed GPU Compute value, but the API difference prevents a direct comparison with the other two.

The benchmark results show why no single test should determine the overall ranking. AnTuTu reflects a broader mixture of CPU, GPU, memory and user-experience performance, while Geekbench focuses more heavily on CPU workloads.

Real-World Performance

Tensor G3 is the most balanced overall choice in NanoReview’s ratings, Dimensity 9000 is strongest for AnTuTu and battery efficiency, and Exynos 2200 offers advanced graphics and video features.

Tensor G3 combines a strong CPU rating, the highest gaming rating, high memory bandwidth and Wi-Fi 7. It is particularly suitable for Pixel users who value Google’s software ecosystem, image processing and on-device features.

Dimensity 9000 remains competitive despite its older architecture. Its AnTuTu 11 lead, 8MB L3 cache, 24GB maximum RAM support and battery rating of 91 make it attractive for demanding Android workloads.

Exynos 2200 offers substantial multimedia capabilities, including 8K30 and 4K120 recording, 200MP camera support, a high-resolution display specification and integrated 5G. Its lower CPU and battery ratings, however, place it behind Tensor G3 and Dimensity 9000 in the overall NanoReview assessment.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Google Tensor G3

Strengths

• Highest overall NanoReview score.
• CPU rating tied for first.
• Highest gaming rating.
• Strong Geekbench 6 CPU results.
• 68.2GB/s memory bandwidth.
• Wi-Fi 7 and 8K30/4K120 video recording.
• UFS 4.0 support.

Weaknesses

• Lower AnTuTu 11 score than both competitors.
• Maximum RAM listed at 16GB.
• Battery score slightly below Dimensity 9000.
• GPU benchmark results depend on API and workload.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Strengths

• Highest AnTuTu 11 result.
• CPU rating tied for first.
• Highest battery score at 91.
• 8MB L3 cache.
• Up to 24GB RAM.
• Up to 320MP camera support.
• Strong 3DMark Wild Life Extreme result.

Weaknesses

• Lowest gaming rating.
• 60GB/s memory bandwidth.
• UFS 3.1 storage listed.
• Wi-Fi 6 rather than Wi-Fi 7.
• Lower video-recording limit of 4K60.

Samsung Exynos 2200

Strengths

• Xclipse 920 GPU based on AMD RDNA 2.
• 8K30 and 4K120 video capture.
• 3840×2160 maximum display resolution.
• Up to 24GB RAM.
• 7.35Gbps listed peak 5G download.
• Strong Solar Bay and GPU Compute results.

Weaknesses

• Lowest overall score.
• Lowest CPU rating.
• Lowest battery rating.
• 51.2GB/s memory bandwidth.
• Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2.

Best Processor for Different Users

Final Verdict and Ranking

Tensor G3 ranks first overall, Dimensity 9000 ranks second, and Exynos 2200 ranks third according to NanoReview’s current overall scores.

#1 Google Tensor G3

The Tensor G3 wins with a NanoReview score of 56. It ties Dimensity 9000 in CPU rating, leads the gaming rating and achieves higher Geekbench CPU results. Its 68.2GB/s memory bandwidth, Wi-Fi 7 and advanced listed video features make it a balanced platform, particularly for Pixel users.

#2 MediaTek Dimensity 9000

The Dimensity 9000 scores 55, one point behind Tensor G3. Its strongest areas are AnTuTu 11, battery efficiency and the listed CPU rating. Its 8MB L3 cache and up to 24GB RAM support remain useful advantages, although its gaming rating and video-capture specifications trail Tensor G3’s.

#3 Samsung Exynos 2200

The Exynos 2200 scores 53 overall. Its Xclipse 920 GPU, 8K30 and 4K120 recording, 200MP camera support and strong listed connectivity features make it a capable flagship chipset. However, NanoReview assigns it the lowest CPU, battery and overall ratings in this comparison.

Winner Summary

Final Ranking

1. Google Tensor G3 — 56
2. MediaTek Dimensity 9000 — 55
3. Samsung Exynos 2200 — 53

The central takeaway is that Tensor G3 is the overall leader by NanoReview’s composite score, while Dimensity 9000 is the AnTuTu and battery-efficiency winner. Exynos 2200 remains strong in graphics compute and high-resolution video capabilities, but its lower CPU and battery ratings place it third overall.

Sources: NanoReview pages for Google Tensor G3, MediaTek Dimensity 9000, and Samsung Exynos 2200. Data checked October 10, 2026.