• Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors

✪ Sego Zero 50 ✪

Sego Zero 50
Last Time Update : 28 October, 2026
United States flag United States
$150 USD
…
Pakistan flag Pakistan (PKR)
45,000 PKR
India flag India (INR)
₹13,500 INR

✪ Sego Zero 50 ✪

Sego Zero 50
Quick Specs
Display
6.67 inchAMOLED120 Hz
Processor
Helio G100Octa-core
RAM & Storage
8+ 256 GB
Rear Camera
64 MP
Front Camera
32 MP
Battery & Charging
5000 mAh33 W

Full Specification

!
IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

BASIC INFO
Mobile
Sego Zero 50
Series
Zero
Category
Mid-Range
Release Date
16 June,2025
Year
2025
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Network
4G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.2
NFC
No
OS
Android 14
BODY
Dimensions
167 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm
Build
Plastic ( Frame And Back)
KG Weight
180 g
Screen Size
6.67 inch
Resolution
1080 x 2400 pixels
Type
AMOLED
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
1000 nits
HBM Brightness
700 Nits
Ram Memory
8+ 256 GB
Ram Type
LPDDR4X
Storage Type
UFS 2.2
SD Card
No
Variants
8 + 256 GB
MP
Rear Camera
64 MP
Front Camera
32 MP
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30/60 fps
Front Recording
2K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30/60 fps
FLASH
Flash
LED Flash
Capacity
5000 mAh
Fast Charging
33 W
Li Battery Type
Li-Ion
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger
BASIC INFO
Mobile
Sego Zero 50
Series
Zero
Category
Mid-Range
Release Date
16 June,2025
Year
2025
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Network
4G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.2
NFC
No
OS
Android 14
BODY
Dimensions
167 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm
Build
Plastic ( Frame And Back)
KG Weight
180 g
Screen Size
6.67 inch
Resolution
1080 x 2400 pixels
Type
AMOLED
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
1000 nits
HBM Brightness
700 Nits
Processor
Helio G100
Processor Link
Max Clock
Octa-core
Lithography
6 nm
GPU
Mali-G57 MP2
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
550 K
Architecture
2 x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6 x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Ram Memory
8+ 256 GB
SD Card
No
Ram Type
LPDDR4X
Storage Type
UFS 2.2
Variants
8 + 256 GB
MP
Rear Camera
64 MP
Front Camera
32 MP
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30/60 fps
Front Recording
2K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30/60 fps
FLASH
Flash
LED Flash
Capacity
5000 mAh
Fast Charging
33 W
Li Battery Type
Li-Ion
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Official Manufacturer WebsiteExplore the original product information (opens in a new tab)

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 2 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 28 October, 2026

Highlights & Review Of Sego Zero 50

Display Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 has a 6.67-inch AMOLED panel at 1080 x 2400 pixels and 120 Hz, the smallest screen in this group. The Tecno Pova 6 4G and Infinix Note 40 4G both measure 6.78 inches, and the ZTE Nubia V80 Pro measures 6.75 inches.

The Nubia V80 Pro is the only phone here without AMOLED. Its 900 x 1940 IPS LCD works out to about 317 PPI, against about 395 PPI on the Sego Zero 50, so text looks softer and blacks look less deep. All four phones run at 120 Hz, so scrolling smoothness does not separate them.

The brightness figures use different labels, so they need care. The Sego Zero 50 lists 1000 nits peak and 700 nits HBM. The Tecno Pova 6 4G lists only a 1300 nits peak, with no HBM figure. The Infinix Note 40 4G and Nubia V80 Pro list 1300 nits and 1000 nits HBM. Peak and HBM are different measurements, so only the HBM values are comparable with each other. On that basis the Sego Zero 50’s 700 nits is the lowest listed HBM in this group, which matters for outdoor visibility.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new and the Nubia V80 Pro costs PKR 48,000 new. The Pova 6 4G at PKR 50,000 and the Note 40 4G at PKR 42,000 are used units, so their prices are not like-for-like with the new ones.

PhoneSizeResolutionPanelRefresh RateBrightness (as listed)
Sego Zero 506.67-inch1080 x 2400AMOLED120 Hz1000 nits peak, 700 nits HBM
Tecno Pova 6 4G6.78-inch1080 x 2460AMOLED120 Hz1300 nits peak
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro6.75-inch900 x 1940IPS LCD120 Hz1000 nits HBM
Infinix Note 40 4G6.78-inch1080 x 2436AMOLED120 Hz1300 nits HBM

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the strongest display on paper, with a 6.78-inch AMOLED and 1300 nits HBM at PKR 42,000 used. The Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition AMOLED choice at PKR 45,000. It is clearly sharper than the IPS Nubia V80 Pro at PKR 48,000, but its 700 nits HBM is the lowest listed in this group.

Performance Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G leads this group at 580K AnTuTu (v11) on its Helio G99, with the Tecno Pova 6 4G just behind at 575K AnTuTu (v11) on the same chip. The Sego Zero 50 scores 550K AnTuTu (v11) on its Helio G100, and the ZTE Nubia V80 Pro trails at 450K AnTuTu (v11) on the Unisoc T620. All four phones have a v11 result, so v11 is the only fair four-way comparison. A v10 score exists only for the Infinix Note 40 4G (460K) and the Nubia V80 Pro (300K). The Sego Zero 50 and Pova 6 4G have no v10 result, so v10 cannot rank them.

The Infinix Note 40 4G and Tecno Pova 6 4G are separated by only 5K points, which is effectively a tie in daily use. The Sego Zero 50 sits 25K below the Pova 6 4G and 30K below the Note 40 4G, a gap too small to notice in normal apps. All three use 6 nm and a Mali-G57 GPU, though the Sego Zero 50 has the MP2 configuration and the other two have MC2.

The listings also disagree on the G99’s performance cores. The Infinix listing gives 2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and the Pova listing gives 2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz, and this has not been independently confirmed. The Sego Zero 50 lists 2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76.

The Nubia V80 Pro is clearly the weakest here. The Unisoc T620 uses a 12 nm process, Cortex-A75 cores and a single-core Mali-G57 MP1, so expect weaker graphics performance and lower efficiency than the other three.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new and the Nubia V80 Pro PKR 48,000 new. The Note 40 4G is PKR 42,000 used and the Pova 6 4G is PKR 50,000 used.

PhoneProcessorProcessGPUCPU CoresAnTuTu v11AnTuTu v10
Infinix Note 40 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC22x 2.2 GHz A78 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55580K460K
Tecno Pova 6 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC22x 2.2 GHz A76 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55575K–
Sego Zero 50Helio G1006 nmMali-G57 MP22x 2.2 GHz A76 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55550K–
ZTE Nubia V80 ProUnisoc T62012 nmMali-G57 MP12x 2.2 GHz A75 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55450K300K

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the best performance value here at 580K AnTuTu (v11) and PKR 42,000 used. The Tecno Pova 6 4G is nearly identical in speed at 575K but costs PKR 8,000 more. The Sego Zero 50 is the better choice for a buyer who wants a new phone, with 550K on the Helio G100 at PKR 45,000, while the Nubia V80 Pro is 100K behind it and costs more.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 (8 + 256 GB) pairs 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM with 256 GB UFS 2.2 storage and has no microSD slot. The Infinix Note 40 4G (8 + 256 GB) matches it exactly, with 8 GB LPDDR4X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 and no microSD.

The Tecno Pova 6 4G (12 + 256 GB) is the only phone here with more RAM, at 12 GB LPDDR4X, and it also pairs 256 GB UFS 2.2 with microSD support. The ZTE Nubia V80 Pro (8 + 256 GB) has 8 GB LPDDR4X and 256 GB eMMC 5.1, with microSD support. All four phones use the same RAM type, so the real differences are capacity, storage standard and expandability.

The Pova 6 4G’s 12 GB is 4 GB more than the other three, which gives it more room to keep apps open in the background. The Pova 6 4G is also sold in an 8 + 256 GB variant, but only the 12 + 256 GB configuration is compared here.

The storage standard separates the phones more than the RAM does. The Sego Zero 50, Infinix Note 40 4G and Tecno Pova 6 4G all use UFS 2.2. The Nubia V80 Pro uses eMMC 5.1, an older and slower standard, so app installs, game loading and large file transfers will generally be slower on the Nubia despite its microSD slot.

Expandability is a practical trade-off. The Sego Zero 50 and Infinix Note 40 4G are fixed at 256 GB with no microSD slot. Buyers who store lots of videos or offline media will notice that limit sooner than on the Pova 6 4G or Nubia V80 Pro.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new, the Nubia V80 Pro PKR 48,000 new, the Infinix Note 40 4G PKR 42,000 used and the Tecno Pova 6 4G PKR 50,000 used.

PhoneVariantRAMRAM TypeStorage TypemicroSD
Sego Zero 508 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR4XUFS 2.2No
Tecno Pova 6 4G12 + 256 GB12 GBLPDDR4XUFS 2.2Yes
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro8 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR4XeMMC 5.1Yes
Infinix Note 40 4G8 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR4XUFS 2.2No

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G has the strongest memory package here, with 12 GB RAM, UFS 2.2 and microSD support, at PKR 50,000 used. The Infinix Note 40 4G offers the same memory as the Sego Zero 50 for PKR 42,000 used. For new-condition buyers, the Sego Zero 50 at PKR 45,000 is the better pick over the Nubia V80 Pro at PKR 48,000, unless microSD matters more than the faster UFS 2.2 storage.

Camera Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 has a 64 MP rear camera and a 32 MP front camera. Its main sensor is lower than the 108 MP of the Tecno Pova 6 4G and Infinix Note 40 4G and higher than the 50 MP of the ZTE Nubia V80 Pro. Only the Infinix Note 40 4G names its main sensor, the Samsung S5KHM2.

The other three listings do not disclose a sensor brand, so megapixel count is the only comparison available for them. No phone lists aperture, sensor size or OIS, so none can be credited with optical stabilization.

Stabilization is a real differentiator where it is listed. The Pova 6 4G and Note 40 4G both list digital stabilization, and the Nubia V80 Pro lists none. The Sego Zero 50 lists nothing for stabilization, so its status is unconfirmed.

Video separates the phones more clearly. The Sego Zero 50, Pova 6 4G and Note 40 4G all record rear video at 2K 30 fps and 1080p 60 fps, while the Nubia V80 Pro tops out at 1080p 30 fps. On the front, the Sego Zero 50 and Pova 6 4G record 2K 30 fps. The Note 40 4G stops at 1080p 60 fps, and the Nubia V80 Pro records 1080p 30 fps from a 16 MP front camera, half the resolution of the other three.

The Pova 6 4G and Note 40 4G both list a 12000 x 9000 maximum photo resolution and 10x digital zoom. The Pova 6 4G also adds a quad rear flash and a dual-LED front flash. Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026.

PhoneRear CameraFront CameraMain SensorStabilizationRear VideoFront Video
Sego Zero 5064 MP32 MP––2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps
Infinix Note 40 4G108 + 2 + 0.3 MP32 MPSamsung S5KHM2 (108 MP)–2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps
Tecno Pova 6 4G108 + 2 MP32 MP––2K 30 fps, 1080p 60 fps, 720p 30 fps2K 30 fps, 1080p 60 fps, 720p 30 fps
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro50 MP16 MP––1080p 30 fps1080p 30 fps

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the safest camera buy here, with a named Samsung S5KHM2 108 MP sensor, digital stabilization and 2K rear video at PKR 42,000 used. The Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition option at PKR 45,000, with 2K video on both cameras and a 32 MP front camera, but its sensor brand and stabilization are not listed. The Nubia V80 Pro is the weakest, at 1080p 30 fps with no stabilization.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 has a 5000 mAh Li-Ion battery with 33W wired charging, which puts it in the middle of this group. The Tecno Pova 6 4G is far ahead with 6000 mAh and 70W charging. The Infinix Note 40 4G matches the Sego Zero 50’s 5000 mAh capacity but charges faster at 45W. The ZTE Nubia V80 Pro has the same 5000 mAh capacity and the slowest charging at 22.5W.

The Sego Zero 50 gives up 1000 mAh to the Pova 6 4G, which is 20% more capacity, and it charges at less than half the Pova 6 4G’s wattage. Against the Nubia V80 Pro, it holds a 10.5W charging advantage at identical capacity.

Extra charging features separate the phones further. The Infinix Note 40 4G is the only phone listing wireless charging, at 20W, and it also lists reverse wired charging without giving a wattage. The Pova 6 4G and Nubia V80 Pro both list 10W reverse wired charging. The Nubia V80 Pro states wireless charging as No.

The Sego Zero 50 lists neither wireless nor reverse charging, so those features are unconfirmed for it, and the Pova 6 4G’s wireless charging is also not listed. Cell chemistry differs as well. The Sego Zero 50 and Nubia V80 Pro list Li-Ion, while the Infinix Note 40 4G and Pova 6 4G list Li-Po.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new and the Nubia V80 Pro PKR 48,000 new. The Note 40 4G is PKR 42,000 used and the Pova 6 4G is PKR 50,000 used.

PhoneCapacityWired ChargingWireless ChargingReverse WiredBattery Type
Sego Zero 505000 mAh33W––Li-Ion
Tecno Pova 6 4G6000 mAh70W–10WLi-Po
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro5000 mAh22.5WNo10WLi-Ion
Infinix Note 40 4G5000 mAh45W20WYes (wattage not listed)Li-Po

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G has the best battery package here, with 6000 mAh and 70W charging at PKR 50,000 used. The Infinix Note 40 4G offers the most features at 45W wired and 20W wireless for PKR 42,000 used. The Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition battery choice at PKR 45,000, with 33W charging that beats the 22.5W Nubia V80 Pro, which costs more.

Final Verdict

The Infinix Note 40 4G is the overall winner in this comparison. It has the highest AnTuTu score here at 580K (v11), the brightest listed HBM at 1300 nits, a named Samsung S5KHM2 108 MP sensor and 20W wireless charging, all for PKR 42,000 used. The Tecno Pova 6 4G is a very close second and wins on memory and battery with 12 GB RAM, microSD support, 6000 mAh and 70W charging.

At PKR 50,000 used, it costs PKR 8,000 more for a processor score only 5K lower. The Sego Zero 50 takes third place. It is the best new-condition phone here at PKR 45,000, with 550K (v11) on the Helio G100, UFS 2.2 storage and 2K video on both cameras, but its 700 nits HBM, 33W charging and unlisted sensor and stabilization details hold it back.

The ZTE Nubia V80 Pro finishes last at PKR 48,000 new, with an IPS LCD panel at 900 x 1940, eMMC 5.1 storage, 450K (v11) and 1080p 30 fps video.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026, and the Note 40 4G and Pova 6 4G are used units, so a buyer who wants a new phone should treat the Sego Zero 50 as the winner of the new-condition options.

Bottom line: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the best overall value at PKR 42,000 used, the Tecno Pova 6 4G is the best choice if 12 GB RAM and 70W charging matter, and the Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition buy at PKR 45,000.

Ranking:

  1. Infinix Note 40 4G – PKR 42,000 (used)
  2. Tecno Pova 6 4G – PKR 50,000 (used)
  3. Sego Zero 50 – PKR 45,000 (new)
  4. ZTE Nubia V80 Pro – PKR 48,000 (new)

Display Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 has a 6.67-inch AMOLED panel at 1080 x 2400 pixels and 120 Hz, the smallest screen in this group. The Tecno Pova 6 4G and Infinix Note 40 4G both measure 6.78 inches, and the ZTE Nubia V80 Pro measures 6.75 inches.

The Nubia V80 Pro is the only phone here without AMOLED. Its 900 x 1940 IPS LCD works out to about 317 PPI, against about 395 PPI on the Sego Zero 50, so text looks softer and blacks look less deep. All four phones run at 120 Hz, so scrolling smoothness does not separate them.

The brightness figures use different labels, so they need care. The Sego Zero 50 lists 1000 nits peak and 700 nits HBM. The Tecno Pova 6 4G lists only a 1300 nits peak, with no HBM figure. The Infinix Note 40 4G and Nubia V80 Pro list 1300 nits and 1000 nits HBM. Peak and HBM are different measurements, so only the HBM values are comparable with each other. On that basis the Sego Zero 50’s 700 nits is the lowest listed HBM in this group, which matters for outdoor visibility.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new and the Nubia V80 Pro costs PKR 48,000 new. The Pova 6 4G at PKR 50,000 and the Note 40 4G at PKR 42,000 are used units, so their prices are not like-for-like with the new ones.

PhoneSizeResolutionPanelRefresh RateBrightness (as listed)
Sego Zero 506.67-inch1080 x 2400AMOLED120 Hz1000 nits peak, 700 nits HBM
Tecno Pova 6 4G6.78-inch1080 x 2460AMOLED120 Hz1300 nits peak
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro6.75-inch900 x 1940IPS LCD120 Hz1000 nits HBM
Infinix Note 40 4G6.78-inch1080 x 2436AMOLED120 Hz1300 nits HBM

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the strongest display on paper, with a 6.78-inch AMOLED and 1300 nits HBM at PKR 42,000 used. The Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition AMOLED choice at PKR 45,000. It is clearly sharper than the IPS Nubia V80 Pro at PKR 48,000, but its 700 nits HBM is the lowest listed in this group.

Performance Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G leads this group at 580K AnTuTu (v11) on its Helio G99, with the Tecno Pova 6 4G just behind at 575K AnTuTu (v11) on the same chip. The Sego Zero 50 scores 550K AnTuTu (v11) on its Helio G100, and the ZTE Nubia V80 Pro trails at 450K AnTuTu (v11) on the Unisoc T620. All four phones have a v11 result, so v11 is the only fair four-way comparison. A v10 score exists only for the Infinix Note 40 4G (460K) and the Nubia V80 Pro (300K). The Sego Zero 50 and Pova 6 4G have no v10 result, so v10 cannot rank them.

The Infinix Note 40 4G and Tecno Pova 6 4G are separated by only 5K points, which is effectively a tie in daily use. The Sego Zero 50 sits 25K below the Pova 6 4G and 30K below the Note 40 4G, a gap too small to notice in normal apps. All three use 6 nm and a Mali-G57 GPU, though the Sego Zero 50 has the MP2 configuration and the other two have MC2.

The listings also disagree on the G99’s performance cores. The Infinix listing gives 2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and the Pova listing gives 2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz, and this has not been independently confirmed. The Sego Zero 50 lists 2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76.

The Nubia V80 Pro is clearly the weakest here. The Unisoc T620 uses a 12 nm process, Cortex-A75 cores and a single-core Mali-G57 MP1, so expect weaker graphics performance and lower efficiency than the other three.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new and the Nubia V80 Pro PKR 48,000 new. The Note 40 4G is PKR 42,000 used and the Pova 6 4G is PKR 50,000 used.

PhoneProcessorProcessGPUCPU CoresAnTuTu v11AnTuTu v10
Infinix Note 40 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC22x 2.2 GHz A78 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55580K460K
Tecno Pova 6 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC22x 2.2 GHz A76 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55575K–
Sego Zero 50Helio G1006 nmMali-G57 MP22x 2.2 GHz A76 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55550K–
ZTE Nubia V80 ProUnisoc T62012 nmMali-G57 MP12x 2.2 GHz A75 + 6x 2.0 GHz A55450K300K

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the best performance value here at 580K AnTuTu (v11) and PKR 42,000 used. The Tecno Pova 6 4G is nearly identical in speed at 575K but costs PKR 8,000 more. The Sego Zero 50 is the better choice for a buyer who wants a new phone, with 550K on the Helio G100 at PKR 45,000, while the Nubia V80 Pro is 100K behind it and costs more.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 (8 + 256 GB) pairs 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM with 256 GB UFS 2.2 storage and has no microSD slot. The Infinix Note 40 4G (8 + 256 GB) matches it exactly, with 8 GB LPDDR4X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 and no microSD.

The Tecno Pova 6 4G (12 + 256 GB) is the only phone here with more RAM, at 12 GB LPDDR4X, and it also pairs 256 GB UFS 2.2 with microSD support. The ZTE Nubia V80 Pro (8 + 256 GB) has 8 GB LPDDR4X and 256 GB eMMC 5.1, with microSD support. All four phones use the same RAM type, so the real differences are capacity, storage standard and expandability.

The Pova 6 4G’s 12 GB is 4 GB more than the other three, which gives it more room to keep apps open in the background. The Pova 6 4G is also sold in an 8 + 256 GB variant, but only the 12 + 256 GB configuration is compared here.

The storage standard separates the phones more than the RAM does. The Sego Zero 50, Infinix Note 40 4G and Tecno Pova 6 4G all use UFS 2.2. The Nubia V80 Pro uses eMMC 5.1, an older and slower standard, so app installs, game loading and large file transfers will generally be slower on the Nubia despite its microSD slot.

Expandability is a practical trade-off. The Sego Zero 50 and Infinix Note 40 4G are fixed at 256 GB with no microSD slot. Buyers who store lots of videos or offline media will notice that limit sooner than on the Pova 6 4G or Nubia V80 Pro.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new, the Nubia V80 Pro PKR 48,000 new, the Infinix Note 40 4G PKR 42,000 used and the Tecno Pova 6 4G PKR 50,000 used.

PhoneVariantRAMRAM TypeStorage TypemicroSD
Sego Zero 508 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR4XUFS 2.2No
Tecno Pova 6 4G12 + 256 GB12 GBLPDDR4XUFS 2.2Yes
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro8 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR4XeMMC 5.1Yes
Infinix Note 40 4G8 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR4XUFS 2.2No

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G has the strongest memory package here, with 12 GB RAM, UFS 2.2 and microSD support, at PKR 50,000 used. The Infinix Note 40 4G offers the same memory as the Sego Zero 50 for PKR 42,000 used. For new-condition buyers, the Sego Zero 50 at PKR 45,000 is the better pick over the Nubia V80 Pro at PKR 48,000, unless microSD matters more than the faster UFS 2.2 storage.

Camera Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 has a 64 MP rear camera and a 32 MP front camera. Its main sensor is lower than the 108 MP of the Tecno Pova 6 4G and Infinix Note 40 4G and higher than the 50 MP of the ZTE Nubia V80 Pro. Only the Infinix Note 40 4G names its main sensor, the Samsung S5KHM2.

The other three listings do not disclose a sensor brand, so megapixel count is the only comparison available for them. No phone lists aperture, sensor size or OIS, so none can be credited with optical stabilization.

Stabilization is a real differentiator where it is listed. The Pova 6 4G and Note 40 4G both list digital stabilization, and the Nubia V80 Pro lists none. The Sego Zero 50 lists nothing for stabilization, so its status is unconfirmed.

Video separates the phones more clearly. The Sego Zero 50, Pova 6 4G and Note 40 4G all record rear video at 2K 30 fps and 1080p 60 fps, while the Nubia V80 Pro tops out at 1080p 30 fps. On the front, the Sego Zero 50 and Pova 6 4G record 2K 30 fps. The Note 40 4G stops at 1080p 60 fps, and the Nubia V80 Pro records 1080p 30 fps from a 16 MP front camera, half the resolution of the other three.

The Pova 6 4G and Note 40 4G both list a 12000 x 9000 maximum photo resolution and 10x digital zoom. The Pova 6 4G also adds a quad rear flash and a dual-LED front flash. Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026.

PhoneRear CameraFront CameraMain SensorStabilizationRear VideoFront Video
Sego Zero 5064 MP32 MP––2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps
Infinix Note 40 4G108 + 2 + 0.3 MP32 MPSamsung S5KHM2 (108 MP)–2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps2K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps
Tecno Pova 6 4G108 + 2 MP32 MP––2K 30 fps, 1080p 60 fps, 720p 30 fps2K 30 fps, 1080p 60 fps, 720p 30 fps
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro50 MP16 MP––1080p 30 fps1080p 30 fps

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the safest camera buy here, with a named Samsung S5KHM2 108 MP sensor, digital stabilization and 2K rear video at PKR 42,000 used. The Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition option at PKR 45,000, with 2K video on both cameras and a 32 MP front camera, but its sensor brand and stabilization are not listed. The Nubia V80 Pro is the weakest, at 1080p 30 fps with no stabilization.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Sego Zero 50 has a 5000 mAh Li-Ion battery with 33W wired charging, which puts it in the middle of this group. The Tecno Pova 6 4G is far ahead with 6000 mAh and 70W charging. The Infinix Note 40 4G matches the Sego Zero 50’s 5000 mAh capacity but charges faster at 45W. The ZTE Nubia V80 Pro has the same 5000 mAh capacity and the slowest charging at 22.5W.

The Sego Zero 50 gives up 1000 mAh to the Pova 6 4G, which is 20% more capacity, and it charges at less than half the Pova 6 4G’s wattage. Against the Nubia V80 Pro, it holds a 10.5W charging advantage at identical capacity.

Extra charging features separate the phones further. The Infinix Note 40 4G is the only phone listing wireless charging, at 20W, and it also lists reverse wired charging without giving a wattage. The Pova 6 4G and Nubia V80 Pro both list 10W reverse wired charging. The Nubia V80 Pro states wireless charging as No.

The Sego Zero 50 lists neither wireless nor reverse charging, so those features are unconfirmed for it, and the Pova 6 4G’s wireless charging is also not listed. Cell chemistry differs as well. The Sego Zero 50 and Nubia V80 Pro list Li-Ion, while the Infinix Note 40 4G and Pova 6 4G list Li-Po.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026. The Sego Zero 50 costs PKR 45,000 new and the Nubia V80 Pro PKR 48,000 new. The Note 40 4G is PKR 42,000 used and the Pova 6 4G is PKR 50,000 used.

PhoneCapacityWired ChargingWireless ChargingReverse WiredBattery Type
Sego Zero 505000 mAh33W––Li-Ion
Tecno Pova 6 4G6000 mAh70W–10WLi-Po
ZTE Nubia V80 Pro5000 mAh22.5WNo10WLi-Ion
Infinix Note 40 4G5000 mAh45W20WYes (wattage not listed)Li-Po

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G has the best battery package here, with 6000 mAh and 70W charging at PKR 50,000 used. The Infinix Note 40 4G offers the most features at 45W wired and 20W wireless for PKR 42,000 used. The Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition battery choice at PKR 45,000, with 33W charging that beats the 22.5W Nubia V80 Pro, which costs more.

Final Verdict

The Infinix Note 40 4G is the overall winner in this comparison. It has the highest AnTuTu score here at 580K (v11), the brightest listed HBM at 1300 nits, a named Samsung S5KHM2 108 MP sensor and 20W wireless charging, all for PKR 42,000 used. The Tecno Pova 6 4G is a very close second and wins on memory and battery with 12 GB RAM, microSD support, 6000 mAh and 70W charging.

At PKR 50,000 used, it costs PKR 8,000 more for a processor score only 5K lower. The Sego Zero 50 takes third place. It is the best new-condition phone here at PKR 45,000, with 550K (v11) on the Helio G100, UFS 2.2 storage and 2K video on both cameras, but its 700 nits HBM, 33W charging and unlisted sensor and stabilization details hold it back.

The ZTE Nubia V80 Pro finishes last at PKR 48,000 new, with an IPS LCD panel at 900 x 1940, eMMC 5.1 storage, 450K (v11) and 1080p 30 fps video.

Prices are retailer quotes from 28 October 2026, and the Note 40 4G and Pova 6 4G are used units, so a buyer who wants a new phone should treat the Sego Zero 50 as the winner of the new-condition options.

Bottom line: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the best overall value at PKR 42,000 used, the Tecno Pova 6 4G is the best choice if 12 GB RAM and 70W charging matter, and the Sego Zero 50 is the best new-condition buy at PKR 45,000.

Ranking:

  1. Infinix Note 40 4G – PKR 42,000 (used)
  2. Tecno Pova 6 4G – PKR 50,000 (used)
  3. Sego Zero 50 – PKR 45,000 (new)
  4. ZTE Nubia V80 Pro – PKR 48,000 (new)

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Curved FHD+ AMOLED display
  • Smooth 120Hz refresh rate
  • Detailed 64MP main camera
  • 32 MP selfie camera
  • Helio G100
  • 33W wired fast charging

Cons

  • No 5G connectivity
  • No IP water resistance
  • No telephoto camera

Who Is It Best For?

Best For

  • Display-focused media users
  • Selfie and social users
  • Everyday photography
  • Light mobile gaming
  • Stylish curved-screen seekers
  • Storage expansion seekers

Not Best For

  • 5G network users
  • Hardcore mobile gamers
  • Zoom photography fans
  • Water-resistance seekers
  • Budget-conscious buyers
Video Reviews & Tests
// hands-on videos for this phone

Official Trailer

Launch Teaser
Official Trailer

Unboxing

What's In The Box
Unboxing

PUBG Gaming Test

FPS & Heat Test
PUBG Gaming Test

Camera Test

Photo & Video Samples
Camera Test

Related Comparisions

FAQs Questions

Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

It has a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 1080 x 2400 pixel (Full HD+) resolution and a 120 Hz refresh rate. Peak brightness is 1000 nits and HBM brightness is 700 nits, so it stays reasonably visible outdoors and scrolling feels smooth.

It is powered by the MediaTek Helio G100, an octa-core chip built on a 6 nm process with a Mali-G57 MP2 GPU. The CPU uses 2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 performance cores and 6 x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. It scores around 550K on AnTuTu v11, which suits daily use and casual gaming.

It comes in a single 8 GB RAM + 256 GB storage variant. The RAM is LPDDR4X and the storage is UFS 2.2. There is no SD card slot, so the 256 GB can’t be expanded.

It has a 64 MP rear camera and a 32 MP front camera with an LED flash. Both cameras record 2K video at 30 fps and 1080p at 30/60 fps. That makes it a solid camera setup for a budget phone, including for selfies and video calls.

It has a 5000 mAh Li-Ion battery with 33W fast charging. That should comfortably last a full day of normal use.

Scroll to Top