• Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors

✪ Tecno Spark Go 3 ✪

Tecno Spark Go 3
Last Time Update : 27 October, 2026
United States flag United States
$130 USD
…
Pakistan flag Pakistan (PKR)
46,000 PKR
India flag India (INR)
₹14,000 INR

✪ Tecno Spark Go 3 ✪

Tecno Spark Go 3
Quick Specs
Display
6.74 inchIPS LCD120 Hz
Processor
Unisoc T72501.8 GHz
RAM & Storage
4 + 128 GB
Rear Camera
13 MP
Front Camera
8 MP
Battery & Charging
5000 mAh15 W

Full Specification

!
IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

BASIC INFO
Mobile
Tecno Spark Go 3
Model
KN3
Series
Spark Series
Category
Budget
Release Date
23 January,2026
Year
2026
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Dual Nano-SIM
Network
4G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.2
NFC
No
OS
Android 15
BODY
Dimensions
167.7 x 77.8 x 8.1 mm
Build
Plastic ( Back And Frame )
KG Weight
182 g
Screen Size
6.74 inch
Resolution
720 x 1600 Pixels
Type
IPS LCD
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
500 Nits
Ram Memory
4 + 128 GB
Ram Type
LPDDR4X
Storage Type
eMMC 5.1
SD Card
Yes
Variants
4 + 128 GB
4 + 64 GB
MP
Rear Camera
13 MP
Front Camera
8 MP
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2K@ 30 fps
1080p @ 30 fps
Front Recording
1080p@ 30 fps
ZOOM
D Digital Zoom
10 x
FLASH
Flash
Dual LED Flash
Front Flash
Screen Flash
Capacity
5000 mAh
Fast Charging
15 W
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
OTHER
Charging Time
100 Mints
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Single Mono Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Side Mounted
Other Sensors
✅ Accelerometer
✅ Proximity Sensor
✅ Compass
✅ Gyroscope
✅Ambient Light.etc
Special Features

–

BASIC INFO
Mobile
Tecno Spark Go 3
Model
KN3
Series
Spark Series
Category
Budget
Release Date
23 January,2026
Year
2026
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Dual Nano-SIM
Network
4G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.2
NFC
No
OS
Android 15
BODY
Dimensions
167.7 x 77.8 x 8.1 mm
Build
Plastic ( Back And Frame )
KG Weight
182 g
Screen Size
6.74 inch
Resolution
720 x 1600 Pixels
Type
IPS LCD
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
500 Nits
Processor
Unisoc T7250
Processor Link
Max Clock
1.8 GHz
Lithography
12 nm
GPU
Mali-G57 MP1
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
360 K
Antutu v10
310 K
Bootup Time
29 s
Architecture
6 x 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A55
2 x 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A75
Ram Memory
4 + 128 GB
SD Card
Yes
Ram Type
LPDDR4X
Storage Type
eMMC 5.1
Variants
4 + 128 GB
4 + 64 GB
MP
Rear Camera
13 MP
Front Camera
8 MP
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2K@ 30 fps
1080p @ 30 fps
Front Recording
1080p@ 30 fps
ZOOM
D Digital Zoom
10 x
FLASH
Flash
Dual LED Flash
Front Flash
Screen Flash
Capacity
5000 mAh
Fast Charging
15 W
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
OTHER
Charging Time
100 Mints
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Single Mono Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Side Mounted
Other Sensors
✅ Accelerometer
✅ Proximity Sensor
✅ Compass
✅ Gyroscope
✅Ambient Light.etc
Special Features

–

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Official Manufacturer WebsiteExplore the original product information (opens in a new tab)

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 6 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 27 October, 2026

Highlights & Review Of Tecno Spark Go 3

Display Highlights

The Tecno Spark Go 3 has a 6.74-inch IPS LCD at 720 x 1600 with a 120 Hz refresh rate and 500 nits peak brightness. The Infinix Note 40 4G fits a 6.78-inch AMOLED at 1080 x 2436 with 120 Hz and 1300 nits HBM into almost the same size.

Both are listed at PKR 45,000 by retailers, new for the Spark Go 3 and used for the Note 40 4G. The Infinix Note 40 4G pushes about 2.3 times as many pixels as the Spark Go 3, and its HBM figure is 2.6 times the Spark Go 3’s peak figure. The brightness labels differ between listings (peak or max rated for the Spark Go 3 and Poco C85, HBM for the Note 40 4G and Galaxy A07 4G), so treat those gaps as indicative.

The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G matches the Spark Go 3 on sharpness: its 6.7-inch PLS LCD at 720 x 1600 works out to about 262 ppi, against about 260 ppi. It falls behind on motion and brightness at 90 Hz and 450 nits HBM, so the Spark Go 3 refreshes 33% faster.

The Poco C85 has the largest panel at 6.9-inch and 254 ppi, with 810 nits max rated brightness and 84.3% screen-to-body ratio. Its adaptive 60-120 Hz refresh and tempered glass are differentiators, since the other three listings mention neither. It costs PKR 50,000 new, 11% above the Spark Go 3.

PhonePanelSizeResolutionRefresh rateBrightnessPrice (PKR)
Tecno Spark Go 3IPS LCD6.74-inch720 x 1600120 Hz500 nits (peak)45,000 new
Infinix Note 40 4GAMOLED6.78-inch1080 x 2436120 Hz1300 nits (HBM)45,000 used
Samsung Galaxy A07 4GPLS LCD6.7-inch720 x 160090 Hz450 nits (HBM)42,000 new
Poco C85IPS LCD6.9-inch720 x 1600120 Hz (adaptive 60-120 Hz)810 nits (max rated)50,000 new

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the best display in this group (AMOLED, 1080 x 2436, 1300 nits HBM) at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, while among new phones the Poco C85 leads on size, brightness and refresh handling, and the Spark Go 3 only beats the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G on refresh rate and brightness.

Performance Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G scores 580K AnTuTu (v11) on its Helio G99, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 reaches 360K AnTuTu (v11) on its Unisoc T7250, a 61% lead for the Note 40 4G at the same PKR 45,000 retailer price (new for the Spark Go 3, used for the Note 40 4G). The Helio G99 is built on 6 nm with a Mali-G57 MC2 GPU.

The Unisoc T7250 is a 12 nm chip with a single-core Mali-G57 MP1, so the Spark Go 3 has an older process and a smaller graphics block. The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G runs the same Helio G99 at 535K (v11), which is 8% behind the Note 40 4G and 49% ahead of the Spark Go 3. Because the chip is shared, that spread reflects each device’s listed result and not a different processor.

The Poco C85 pairs a Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm, Mali-G52 MP2) with 345K (v11) and 262K (v10). On v11 it sits within 5% of the Spark Go 3, so the two are level. On v10 it trails the Spark Go 3’s 310K by 15%, which makes it the slowest of the four despite its PKR 50,000 price.

PhoneChipsetProcessGPUAnTuTu v11AnTuTu v10Price (PKR)
Tecno Spark Go 3Unisoc T725012 nmMali-G57 MP1360K310K45,000 new
Infinix Note 40 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC2580K460K45,000 used
Samsung Galaxy A07 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC2535K410K42,000 new
Poco C85Helio G81 Ultra12 nmMali-G52 MP2345K262K50,000 new

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G leads on 580K AnTuTu (v11) at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is the strongest new-phone performer at 535K (v11) for PKR 42,000, and the Poco C85 is the slowest of the four on 262K (v10), even though it costs the most.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G and the Poco C85 both carry 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage, twice the 4 GB and 128 GB of the Tecno Spark Go 3 and the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G.

All four use LPDDR4X RAM, so capacity is the only RAM difference. Per GB of RAM, the Note 40 4G costs PKR 5,625 at its PKR 45,000 used price and the Poco C85 PKR 6,250 at PKR 50,000 new. The Galaxy A07 4G costs PKR 10,500 at PKR 42,000 new and the Spark Go 3 PKR 11,250 at PKR 45,000 new.

Storage type separates the group. The Note 40 4G and the Galaxy A07 4G use UFS 2.2, the faster standard on paper, which implies quicker app loading and file transfers. The Spark Go 3 and the Poco C85 use eMMC 5.1. For a PKR 45,000 phone, the Spark Go 3 pairs the slower storage type with the smallest memory package.

Expandability is the real trade-off. The Note 40 4G has no microSD slot, so its 256 GB is fixed. The Spark Go 3, the Galaxy A07 4G and the Poco C85 all accept microSD cards, and NanoReview lists the Poco C85 up to 1024 GB.

The Poco C85’s NanoReview page displays a 6 GB and 128 GB configuration, so its 8+256 pairing here comes from the retailer listing. Per GB of storage, the Note 40 4G costs PKR 176, the Poco C85 PKR 195, the Galaxy A07 4G PKR 328 and the Spark Go 3 PKR 352.

PhoneRAMRAM typeStorageStorage typemicroSDPrice (PKR)
Tecno Spark Go 34 GBLPDDR4X128 GBeMMC 5.1Yes45,000 new
Infinix Note 40 4G8 GBLPDDR4X256 GBUFS 2.2No45,000 used
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G4 GBLPDDR4X128 GBUFS 2.2Yes42,000 new
Poco C858 GBLPDDR4X256 GBeMMC 5.1Yes50,000 new

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the strongest memory package (8 GB RAM, 256 GB UFS 2.2 at the lowest cost per GB) but no microSD slot, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is the best new-phone option with UFS 2.2 plus expandable storage at PKR 42,000, and the Tecno Spark Go 3 is the weakest of the four at 4 GB and eMMC 5.1 for the highest price per GB.

Camera Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G carries a 108 MP main camera and a 32 MP selfie camera, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 has a 13 MP rear and 8 MP front camera. That gives the Note 40 4G 8.3 times the rear resolution at the same PKR 45,000 retailer price (new for the Spark Go 3, used for the Note 40 4G). Hardware confidence differs across the group. The Note 40 4G has a named Samsung S5KHM2 main sensor, and the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G has a 50 MP Samsung S5KJN1 with an 8 MP GalaxyCore GC08A8 selfie sensor.

The Spark Go 3 listing names no sensor, aperture or sensor size, and the Poco C85 gives no sensor brand. Buyers of those two are judging mostly on megapixels and video specs, and the 13 MP figure implies the least capture detail of the four.

The Poco C85 does publish a 50 MP main camera at f/1.8 with a 1/2.96-inch sensor and phase autofocus. Its 8 MP front camera is f/2.0 with no autofocus, and its second lens is a depth sensor for portrait mode. Video splits the group in two.

The Spark Go 3 and Note 40 4G record 2K at 30 fps, while the Galaxy A07 4G and Poco C85 stop at 1080p at 30 fps.Only the Note 40 4G lists 1080p at 60 fps. Front video is given as 1080p at 30 fps for the Spark Go 3 and Poco C85, and is not listed for the other two. The Spark Go 3 adds screen flash for selfies and a 10x digital zoom, and OIS and aperture values are unconfirmed for it and for the Note 40 4G and A07 4G.

PhoneRear cameraMain sensorFront cameraRear videoFront video
Tecno Spark Go 313 MPNot named8 MP2K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 30 fps1080p @ 30 fps
Infinix Note 40 4G108 + 2 + 0.3 MPSamsung S5KHM232 MP2K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 30/60 fps2K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 30/60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G50 MPSamsung S5KJN18 MP (GalaxyCore GC08A8)1080p @ 30 fps 1080p @ 30/60 fps
Poco C8550 MP + depth lensBrand not named (f/1.8, 1/2.96″)8 MP (f/2.0, no AF)1080p @ 30 fps1080p @ 30 fps

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the strongest camera specs here, with a named 108 MP sensor, 32 MP selfie camera and 2K plus 1080p 60 fps video at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, while the Poco C85 is the only phone with a published aperture, sensor size and autofocus, and the Spark Go 3 has the lowest resolution at 13 MP.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G pairs a 5000 mAh battery with 45W wired charging, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 has the same 5000 mAh capacity but only 15W, so the Note 40 4G charges at three times the rated wattage at the same PKR 45,000 retailer price (new for the Spark Go 3, used for the Note 40 4G).

The Spark Go 3 page lists a 100-minute charge time, the only complete charge time given for any phone in this group. The Note 40 4G also lists 20W wireless charging, a differentiator that none of the other three listings show.

The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G sits in the middle with 5000 mAh and 25W, which is 67% faster by rated wattage than the Spark Go 3. The Poco C85 takes a different route with 6000 mAh, 20% more capacity than the other three, plus 33W charging and reverse charging.

Its listing gives 50% in 31 minutes, a 1000-cycle rating and a 33W charger in the box. The cost of that larger cell is the highest price in the group at PKR 50,000. Per PKR 1,000, the Poco C85 gives about 120 mAh, the Galaxy A07 4G about 119, and the Spark Go 3 and Note 40 4G about 111. The Spark Go 3 matches three rivals on capacity but charges slowest, so its battery case rests on price and not on the spec sheet.

PhoneCapacityWiredWirelessReverse
Tecno Spark Go 35000 mAh15WNot listedNot listed
Infinix Note 40 4G5000 mAh45W20WNot listed
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G5000 mAh25WNot listedNot listed
Poco C856000 mAh33WNoYes

Verdict: The Poco C85 has the largest battery at 6000 mAh, the Infinix Note 40 4G charges fastest at 45W with 20W wireless at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, and the Spark Go 3 has the slowest charging in the group at 15W.

Final Verdict

The Infinix Note 40 4G ranks first on the balanced profile, which weights performance and camera at 25% each, display and battery at 20% each, and RAM and memory at 10%.

It leads on display (AMOLED, 1300 nits HBM), processor (580K AnTuTu (v11)), camera hardware (108 MP) and charging (45W plus 20W wireless), and it ties the Poco C85 on 8+256 GB memory. Its PKR 45,000 is a used price, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 is quoted new at the same figure on 27 October 2026, so the two are not a like-for-like purchase.

The Poco C85 edges the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G by a narrow margin, on its 6000 mAh battery and 6.9-inch 120 Hz panel, but the Galaxy A07 4G is the stronger value among new phones at PKR 42,000. The Spark Go 3 ranks last. Its 120 Hz display is its main strength, and it trails every rival on processor, camera and 15W charging. A missing feature such as fast or wireless charging changes daily use more than a small score gap does.

Bottom line: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the best phone in this group at PKR 45,000 (used), the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is the best-value new phone at PKR 42,000, and the Tecno Spark Go 3 is the weakest option at PKR 45,000 (new).

Ranking:

  1. Infinix Note 40 4G – PKR 45,000 (used)
  2. Poco C85 – PKR 50,000 (new)
  3. Samsung Galaxy A07 4G – PKR 42,000 (new)
  4. Tecno Spark Go 3 – PKR 45,000 (new)

Display Highlights

The Tecno Spark Go 3 has a 6.74-inch IPS LCD at 720 x 1600 with a 120 Hz refresh rate and 500 nits peak brightness. The Infinix Note 40 4G fits a 6.78-inch AMOLED at 1080 x 2436 with 120 Hz and 1300 nits HBM into almost the same size.

Both are listed at PKR 45,000 by retailers, new for the Spark Go 3 and used for the Note 40 4G. The Infinix Note 40 4G pushes about 2.3 times as many pixels as the Spark Go 3, and its HBM figure is 2.6 times the Spark Go 3’s peak figure. The brightness labels differ between listings (peak or max rated for the Spark Go 3 and Poco C85, HBM for the Note 40 4G and Galaxy A07 4G), so treat those gaps as indicative.

The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G matches the Spark Go 3 on sharpness: its 6.7-inch PLS LCD at 720 x 1600 works out to about 262 ppi, against about 260 ppi. It falls behind on motion and brightness at 90 Hz and 450 nits HBM, so the Spark Go 3 refreshes 33% faster.

The Poco C85 has the largest panel at 6.9-inch and 254 ppi, with 810 nits max rated brightness and 84.3% screen-to-body ratio. Its adaptive 60-120 Hz refresh and tempered glass are differentiators, since the other three listings mention neither. It costs PKR 50,000 new, 11% above the Spark Go 3.

PhonePanelSizeResolutionRefresh rateBrightnessPrice (PKR)
Tecno Spark Go 3IPS LCD6.74-inch720 x 1600120 Hz500 nits (peak)45,000 new
Infinix Note 40 4GAMOLED6.78-inch1080 x 2436120 Hz1300 nits (HBM)45,000 used
Samsung Galaxy A07 4GPLS LCD6.7-inch720 x 160090 Hz450 nits (HBM)42,000 new
Poco C85IPS LCD6.9-inch720 x 1600120 Hz (adaptive 60-120 Hz)810 nits (max rated)50,000 new

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the best display in this group (AMOLED, 1080 x 2436, 1300 nits HBM) at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, while among new phones the Poco C85 leads on size, brightness and refresh handling, and the Spark Go 3 only beats the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G on refresh rate and brightness.

Performance Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G scores 580K AnTuTu (v11) on its Helio G99, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 reaches 360K AnTuTu (v11) on its Unisoc T7250, a 61% lead for the Note 40 4G at the same PKR 45,000 retailer price (new for the Spark Go 3, used for the Note 40 4G). The Helio G99 is built on 6 nm with a Mali-G57 MC2 GPU.

The Unisoc T7250 is a 12 nm chip with a single-core Mali-G57 MP1, so the Spark Go 3 has an older process and a smaller graphics block. The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G runs the same Helio G99 at 535K (v11), which is 8% behind the Note 40 4G and 49% ahead of the Spark Go 3. Because the chip is shared, that spread reflects each device’s listed result and not a different processor.

The Poco C85 pairs a Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm, Mali-G52 MP2) with 345K (v11) and 262K (v10). On v11 it sits within 5% of the Spark Go 3, so the two are level. On v10 it trails the Spark Go 3’s 310K by 15%, which makes it the slowest of the four despite its PKR 50,000 price.

PhoneChipsetProcessGPUAnTuTu v11AnTuTu v10Price (PKR)
Tecno Spark Go 3Unisoc T725012 nmMali-G57 MP1360K310K45,000 new
Infinix Note 40 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC2580K460K45,000 used
Samsung Galaxy A07 4GHelio G996 nmMali-G57 MC2535K410K42,000 new
Poco C85Helio G81 Ultra12 nmMali-G52 MP2345K262K50,000 new

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G leads on 580K AnTuTu (v11) at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is the strongest new-phone performer at 535K (v11) for PKR 42,000, and the Poco C85 is the slowest of the four on 262K (v10), even though it costs the most.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G and the Poco C85 both carry 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage, twice the 4 GB and 128 GB of the Tecno Spark Go 3 and the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G.

All four use LPDDR4X RAM, so capacity is the only RAM difference. Per GB of RAM, the Note 40 4G costs PKR 5,625 at its PKR 45,000 used price and the Poco C85 PKR 6,250 at PKR 50,000 new. The Galaxy A07 4G costs PKR 10,500 at PKR 42,000 new and the Spark Go 3 PKR 11,250 at PKR 45,000 new.

Storage type separates the group. The Note 40 4G and the Galaxy A07 4G use UFS 2.2, the faster standard on paper, which implies quicker app loading and file transfers. The Spark Go 3 and the Poco C85 use eMMC 5.1. For a PKR 45,000 phone, the Spark Go 3 pairs the slower storage type with the smallest memory package.

Expandability is the real trade-off. The Note 40 4G has no microSD slot, so its 256 GB is fixed. The Spark Go 3, the Galaxy A07 4G and the Poco C85 all accept microSD cards, and NanoReview lists the Poco C85 up to 1024 GB.

The Poco C85’s NanoReview page displays a 6 GB and 128 GB configuration, so its 8+256 pairing here comes from the retailer listing. Per GB of storage, the Note 40 4G costs PKR 176, the Poco C85 PKR 195, the Galaxy A07 4G PKR 328 and the Spark Go 3 PKR 352.

PhoneRAMRAM typeStorageStorage typemicroSDPrice (PKR)
Tecno Spark Go 34 GBLPDDR4X128 GBeMMC 5.1Yes45,000 new
Infinix Note 40 4G8 GBLPDDR4X256 GBUFS 2.2No45,000 used
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G4 GBLPDDR4X128 GBUFS 2.2Yes42,000 new
Poco C858 GBLPDDR4X256 GBeMMC 5.1Yes50,000 new

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the strongest memory package (8 GB RAM, 256 GB UFS 2.2 at the lowest cost per GB) but no microSD slot, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is the best new-phone option with UFS 2.2 plus expandable storage at PKR 42,000, and the Tecno Spark Go 3 is the weakest of the four at 4 GB and eMMC 5.1 for the highest price per GB.

Camera Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G carries a 108 MP main camera and a 32 MP selfie camera, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 has a 13 MP rear and 8 MP front camera. That gives the Note 40 4G 8.3 times the rear resolution at the same PKR 45,000 retailer price (new for the Spark Go 3, used for the Note 40 4G). Hardware confidence differs across the group. The Note 40 4G has a named Samsung S5KHM2 main sensor, and the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G has a 50 MP Samsung S5KJN1 with an 8 MP GalaxyCore GC08A8 selfie sensor.

The Spark Go 3 listing names no sensor, aperture or sensor size, and the Poco C85 gives no sensor brand. Buyers of those two are judging mostly on megapixels and video specs, and the 13 MP figure implies the least capture detail of the four.

The Poco C85 does publish a 50 MP main camera at f/1.8 with a 1/2.96-inch sensor and phase autofocus. Its 8 MP front camera is f/2.0 with no autofocus, and its second lens is a depth sensor for portrait mode. Video splits the group in two.

The Spark Go 3 and Note 40 4G record 2K at 30 fps, while the Galaxy A07 4G and Poco C85 stop at 1080p at 30 fps.Only the Note 40 4G lists 1080p at 60 fps. Front video is given as 1080p at 30 fps for the Spark Go 3 and Poco C85, and is not listed for the other two. The Spark Go 3 adds screen flash for selfies and a 10x digital zoom, and OIS and aperture values are unconfirmed for it and for the Note 40 4G and A07 4G.

PhoneRear cameraMain sensorFront cameraRear videoFront video
Tecno Spark Go 313 MPNot named8 MP2K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 30 fps1080p @ 30 fps
Infinix Note 40 4G108 + 2 + 0.3 MPSamsung S5KHM232 MP2K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 30/60 fps2K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 30/60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G50 MPSamsung S5KJN18 MP (GalaxyCore GC08A8)1080p @ 30 fps 1080p @ 30/60 fps
Poco C8550 MP + depth lensBrand not named (f/1.8, 1/2.96″)8 MP (f/2.0, no AF)1080p @ 30 fps1080p @ 30 fps

Verdict: The Infinix Note 40 4G has the strongest camera specs here, with a named 108 MP sensor, 32 MP selfie camera and 2K plus 1080p 60 fps video at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, while the Poco C85 is the only phone with a published aperture, sensor size and autofocus, and the Spark Go 3 has the lowest resolution at 13 MP.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Infinix Note 40 4G pairs a 5000 mAh battery with 45W wired charging, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 has the same 5000 mAh capacity but only 15W, so the Note 40 4G charges at three times the rated wattage at the same PKR 45,000 retailer price (new for the Spark Go 3, used for the Note 40 4G).

The Spark Go 3 page lists a 100-minute charge time, the only complete charge time given for any phone in this group. The Note 40 4G also lists 20W wireless charging, a differentiator that none of the other three listings show.

The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G sits in the middle with 5000 mAh and 25W, which is 67% faster by rated wattage than the Spark Go 3. The Poco C85 takes a different route with 6000 mAh, 20% more capacity than the other three, plus 33W charging and reverse charging.

Its listing gives 50% in 31 minutes, a 1000-cycle rating and a 33W charger in the box. The cost of that larger cell is the highest price in the group at PKR 50,000. Per PKR 1,000, the Poco C85 gives about 120 mAh, the Galaxy A07 4G about 119, and the Spark Go 3 and Note 40 4G about 111. The Spark Go 3 matches three rivals on capacity but charges slowest, so its battery case rests on price and not on the spec sheet.

PhoneCapacityWiredWirelessReverse
Tecno Spark Go 35000 mAh15WNot listedNot listed
Infinix Note 40 4G5000 mAh45W20WNot listed
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G5000 mAh25WNot listedNot listed
Poco C856000 mAh33WNoYes

Verdict: The Poco C85 has the largest battery at 6000 mAh, the Infinix Note 40 4G charges fastest at 45W with 20W wireless at the same PKR 45,000 as the Tecno Spark Go 3, and the Spark Go 3 has the slowest charging in the group at 15W.

Final Verdict

The Infinix Note 40 4G ranks first on the balanced profile, which weights performance and camera at 25% each, display and battery at 20% each, and RAM and memory at 10%.

It leads on display (AMOLED, 1300 nits HBM), processor (580K AnTuTu (v11)), camera hardware (108 MP) and charging (45W plus 20W wireless), and it ties the Poco C85 on 8+256 GB memory. Its PKR 45,000 is a used price, while the Tecno Spark Go 3 is quoted new at the same figure on 27 October 2026, so the two are not a like-for-like purchase.

The Poco C85 edges the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G by a narrow margin, on its 6000 mAh battery and 6.9-inch 120 Hz panel, but the Galaxy A07 4G is the stronger value among new phones at PKR 42,000. The Spark Go 3 ranks last. Its 120 Hz display is its main strength, and it trails every rival on processor, camera and 15W charging. A missing feature such as fast or wireless charging changes daily use more than a small score gap does.

Bottom line: The Infinix Note 40 4G is the best phone in this group at PKR 45,000 (used), the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is the best-value new phone at PKR 42,000, and the Tecno Spark Go 3 is the weakest option at PKR 45,000 (new).

Ranking:

  1. Infinix Note 40 4G – PKR 45,000 (used)
  2. Poco C85 – PKR 50,000 (new)
  3. Samsung Galaxy A07 4G – PKR 42,000 (new)
  4. Tecno Spark Go 3 – PKR 45,000 (new)

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Smooth 120Hz Display
  • Large Screen Size
  • 5000mAh Battery
  • Affordable Budget Pricing
  • Modern Android Software
  • USB Type-C Port

Cons

  • Basic Camera Quality
  • Entry-Level Gaming Performance
  • Limited Multitasking Capability
  • No Ultra-Wide Camera
  • No 5G Connectivity
  • Basic Display Resolution

Who Is It Best For?

Best For

  • Everyday Basic Tasks
  • Social Media Browsing
  • Online Classes
  • Casual Video Streaming
  • Long Battery Life
  • Budget-Friendly Users

Not Best For

  • Heavy Gaming
  • Professional Photography
  • High-Resolution Streaming
  • 5G Connectivity Needs
  • Intensive Multitasking
  • High-End Performance
Video Reviews & Tests
// hands-on videos for this phone

Official Trailer

Launch Teaser
Official Trailer

Unboxing

What's In The Box
Unboxing

Disassembly / Teardown

Inside Look
Disassembly / Teardown

PUBG Gaming Test

FPS & Heat Test
PUBG Gaming Test

Camera Test

Photo & Video Samples
Camera Test

Related Comparisions

TECNO Series Row
Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

FAQs Questions

The Tecno Spark Go 3 is an entry-level 4G phone with a 6.74-inch 120Hz display, a Unisoc T7250 processor and a 5000mAh battery with 15W charging. It has 4GB RAM (extendable by 4GB virtual RAM), 64GB or 128GB storage, a 13MP rear camera and an 8MP selfie camera. It runs Android 15 with HiOS 15 and supports dual SIM.

It has a 6.74-inch IPS LCD with a 120Hz refresh rate and 720 x 1600 (HD+) resolution. The 120Hz rate is rare at this price and makes scrolling and swiping feel smooth.

It uses the Unisoc T7250, a 12nm octa-core chip with two 1.8GHz Cortex-A75 cores, six 1.6GHz Cortex-A55 cores and a Mali-G57 GPU.

The Tecno Spark Go 3 has a single 13MP rear camera and an 8MP front camera. It takes decent daylight photos for social media and video calls. Don’t expect strong low-light results, since this is an entry-level camera.

It has a 5000mAh battery with 15W wired charging over USB-C. The efficient processor and HD+ screen help it last a full day for most people. 15W charging is on the slower side, so a full charge takes a while.

The Tecno Spark Go 3 starts at about Rs. 36,999 for the 4GB + 64GB model, and the 4GB + 128GB model is about Rs. 45,999. It’s a 4G phone with no NFC and no 5G, and prices vary by city and shop, so check with a local dealer before buying.

Scroll to Top