Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 30 Pro
- + 2.2x better Camera (108 + 8 MP vs 50 +8 MP)
- + 72% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.7 M vs 990 K)
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12 +256 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- + 29% higher Max Clock (3.35 GHz vs 2.6 GHz)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8350 vs Dimensity 7400
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 2.2
- + Front Sensor: 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K@30 fps 1080p@30/60 fps vs 2K@ 30 fps 1080p@ 60 fps
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- + 50% higher Digital Zoom (15 x vs 10 X)
- + 18% larger Battery (6500 mAh vs 5500 mAH)
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Mid-Range
- + IP Rating: IP68 / IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix GT 30 Pro | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Brand | infinix | Tecno |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 110000 PKR | 150000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹33000 | ₹50000 |
| Price USA | $370 | $500 |
| Variants Prices | 8GB + 256GB 12GB + 256GB | 8 + 256GB =50,000 INR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.8 x 8 mm | 162.5 x 77.3 x 7.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1224 x 2720 Pixels | 1208 x 2644 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 4500 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 1600 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 7400 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.35 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 | 4 × 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.7 M | 990 K |
| Bootup Time | - | 24s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8+ 256GB | 8 + 256 GB 12 + 256 / 512 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 108 + 8 MP | 50 +8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 12000 x 9000 Pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 108 MP = Samsung Bright S5KHMX | 50 MP = Sony LYT 700C |
| Zoom | - | - |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | 15 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO | — |
| Front Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 5500 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | 10 W |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 7 hours | 10h 40m |
| Charging Time | 100% in 60-80 min | 1h 15m |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6873 | LK7 |
| Release Date | 21 May, 2025 | 18 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | GT Series | Pova Series |
| Category | - | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 15 , XOS 15 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 189 grams | 189 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 / IP69K |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | Matrix display (on the back) Camera Module |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Dimensity 8350 | 144Hz AMOLED Display ✅ |
| Cons | ❌No optical zoom | 45W Charging Speed ❌ |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy gamers | Mobile Gaming 🎯 |
| Not Best For | ❌Camera-focused users | Flagship Performance 🚫 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Realme GT Neo 6 | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Unboxing | — | |
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Infinix GT 20 Pro
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Tecno Pova 7 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus
- Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Infinix GT 30
- vivo V50 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Realme 15 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Tecno Pova 8 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











