Itel s26 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Itel s26 Ultra
- + 2.5x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 15% larger Battery (6000 mAh vs 5200 mAh)
- + 11% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (500 K vs 450 K)
- + Includes Card Slot
- + Digital Zoom: 10 X
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
Reasons to consider the Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- + 2.5x better Charging Watts (45 W vs 18 W)
- + 13% higher Screen Resolution (1224 × 2720 Pixels vs 1080 x 2436 Pixels)
- + 8% newer Bluetooth (5.4 vs 5.0)
- + HBM Brightness: 1600 Nits
- + Better Processor: Helio G200 vs Unisoc T7300
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Model Number: KM7
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Itel s26 Ultra | Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus |
| Brand | itel | Tecno |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 57000 PKR | 70000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹15000 | ₹19500 |
| Price USA | $160 | $200 |
| Variants Prices | 8+ 128GB = 45,000 PKR | Not Confirm | 8 + 256GB = 19,500 INR | 200 $ | 70,000 PKR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 164.0 × 75.8 × 6.8 mm | 163.9 × 75.8 × 6.49 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1080 x 2436 Pixels | 1224 × 2720 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 4500 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | - | 1600 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Unisoc T7300 | Helio G200 |
| Lithography Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 | 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 (1.1 GHz) |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 500 K | 450 K |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | Yes | Not Confirm |
| Variants | 8+ 128GB | 8 + 128 GB 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+2 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | _ | 50 MP = Hynix HI5022Q |
| Zoom | - | - |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | - |
| Video Recording | 2K @ 30fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Front Resolution | 6528 × 4896 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 2K @ 30fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | No | 30 W |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | No | 5 W |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | - |
| Charging Time | - | 50-55 Mints (0-100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | - | KM7 |
| Release Date | 15 November, 2024 | 2 July, 2025 |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Series Name | S Series | Spark Series |
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 15, itel OS 15.1 | Android 17, HiOS 17 ( 1 Android upgrades Remains ) |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 160 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | – | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G | 4G / 4G+ |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Single Mono Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Proximity | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅144Hz display | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED Display |
| Cons | ❌Only 18W Charging | ❌ No 5G Support |
| Best For | ✅Smooth 144Hz viewing ✅Outdoor bright use ✅Premium look hunters ✅Accident drop protection ✅Ultra slim design ✅Outdoor Brightness Needs ✅Casual Selfie Takers ✅First-time Smartphone Users ✅Students & Youngsters | ✅ Smooth Display Lovers |
| Not Best For | ❌Heavy mobile gaming ❌Advanced mobile photography ❌Pro Video Creators ❌Audiophiles (No Jack) ❌Fast Charging Fans | ❌ 5G Network Users |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Tecno Spark 40 Pro | Honor X8D |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- Tecno Pova Slim vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- Infinix Zero 40 4G vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- Itel s25 Ultra vs Itel s26 Ultra
- Itel s25 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- Itel s26 Ultra vs Infinix Hot 60 Pro Plus
- Itel s26 Ultra vs ZTE Nubia Focus Pro 5G
- Itel s26 Ultra vs Infinix Hot 70
- Tecno Pova 6 4G vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus vs Infinix Hot 70 Pro
- Infinix Hot 60 Pro Plus vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus vs Oppo Reno 12F
- Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus vs Infinix Hot 50 Pro Plus
- Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus vs Honor X8d
- Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus vs Infinix Note 40 Pro Plus
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











