Oppo Reno 15 vs Samsung Galaxy A57
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15
- 4.2x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 12 MP)
- 78% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 45 W)
- 50% more RAM Memory (12 + 512 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- 30% larger Battery (6500 mAh vs 5000 mAH)
- 16% higher Screen Resolution (1256 x 2760 pixels Pixels vs 1080 x 2340 Pixels)
- 5% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.43 M vs 1.36 M)
- Better Zoom: 3.5 x vs Not Confirm
- Better Digital Zoom: 18 x vs Not Confirm
- Front Flash: Screen Flash
- Includes Reverse Charging
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A57
- 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- 9% lighter Weight (179 g vs 197 g)
- Better Screen Type: Super AMOLED vs Amoled
- Peak Brightness: 1900 nits
- Better Processor: Exynos 1680 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
- IP Rating: ip 68
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Oppo Reno 15 | Samsung Galaxy A57 |
| Brand | OPPO | Samsung |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 165000 PKR | 148000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹55000 | ₹49000 |
| Price USA | $550 | $500 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB | 8 + 256 GB _______________________________ |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 158 x 74.8 x 7.8 mm | 161.5 × 76.8 × 6.9 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.59 inch | 6.7 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels Pixels | 1080 x 2340 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Super AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | - | 1900 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1200 nits | ~1200 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Exynos 1680 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 | 1×2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Xclipse 550 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.43 M | 1.36 M |
| Bootup Time | 22 s | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 512 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 256/512 GB | 8 + 128/256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 12 + 5 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 M = Sony ISOCELL IMX882 | 50 MP = Sony IMX906 |
| Zoom | 3.5 x | Not Confirm |
| Digital Zoom | 18 x | Not Confirm |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Yes | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP = Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 | 12 MP = Not Confirm |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 4000 × 3000 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 17 hour | Not Confirm |
| Charging Time | 55-65 m (0% To 100%) | Not Confirm |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | CPH2813 | SM-A576B |
| Release Date | 2 January, 2026 | 9 April, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Oppo Reno Series | A Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 Now | Android 17, up to 5 major OS updates |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 179 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back | Aluminum frame , Glass back |
| IP Rating | — | ip 68 |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Massive battery 🔋 (6500mAh) | 120Hz AMOLED Display 📱 |
| Cons | ❌ Weak ultrawide 📸 (only 8MP) | No Front Autofocus 🤳 |
| Best For | 🎯 Content creators 🎥 | Media Consumption 🎬 |
| Not Best For | 🚫 Camera pros 📷 (wide-angle weak) | Hardcore Gaming 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | vivo v70 | |
| Unboxing | — | |
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works