Introduction

The Kirin 9035 vs Dimensity 8350 vs Kirin 9030 Pro comparison brings together two HiSilicon processors and one MediaTek chipset from different market segments.

Kirin 9035 was announced in October 2026 and uses a nine-core CPU, Maleoon 935 graphics and a 5nm manufacturing process. Kirin 9030 Pro arrived in November 2025 with a similar nine-core configuration and the same GPU family. MediaTek Dimensity 8350 launched in November 2024 using an eight-core Cortex CPU, Mali-G615 MP6 graphics and TSMC’s 4nm process.

NanoReview’s overall ratings are 58 for Kirin 9035, 57 for Dimensity 8350 and 56 for Kirin 9030 Pro. The scores are close, but the category ratings highlight different strengths. Kirin 9035 has the highest CPU score, Dimensity 8350 leads battery efficiency, and all three receive the same gaming rating.

One important consideration is data maturity: Kirin 9035 is newly listed, and NanoReview currently reports fewer than three benchmark samples for some of its tests. Its ranking should therefore be treated as provisional until more results become available.

Quick Answer

The Kirin 9035 is the overall winner according to NanoReview, scoring 58 compared with 57 for Dimensity 8350 and 56 for Kirin 9030 Pro. Kirin 9035 leads CPU performance and AnTuTu 11, while Dimensity 8350 offers better rated battery efficiency, competitive graphics and support for up to 24GB RAM. Kirin 9030 Pro remains close to Kirin 9035 but has lower benchmark scores.

Specification Comparison

Source: NanoReview’s individual processor pages. Missing values mean that the page does not list an equivalent specification, not necessarily that the hardware lacks that capability.

CPU Architecture and Performance

Kirin 9035 has the highest NanoReview CPU rating, followed by Kirin 9030 Pro and Dimensity 8350.

Kirin 9035 uses one Taishan v124 Big core at 2.85GHz, four Mid cores at 2.27GHz and four Little cores at 1.72GHz. Its nine-core arrangement is listed with ARMv8-A and a 5nm SMIC manufacturing process. The core configuration resembles Kirin 9030 Pro, but the 9035’s Big core runs at a higher frequency.

Kirin 9030 Pro uses one Taishan v124 Big core at 2.75GHz, four Mid cores at 2.27GHz and four Little cores at 1.72GHz. NanoReview lists 2MB of L2 cache and 12MB of L3 cache, providing a substantial cache capacity for its architecture.

Dimensity 8350 uses one Cortex-A715 core at 3.35GHz, three additional A715 cores at 3.2GHz and four Cortex-A510 cores at 2.2GHz. Its design combines performance-oriented cores with four efficiency cores and uses the newer ARMv9-A instruction set.

NanoReview’s CPU ratings are 59 for Kirin 9035, 56 for Kirin 9030 Pro and 53 for Dimensity 8350. The scores suggest an advantage for Kirin 9035 in the site’s aggregate CPU metric. However, Dimensity 8350’s higher clock speeds show why clock frequency alone is not enough to predict CPU performance across different architectures.

GPU and Gaming Performance

All three processors tie on NanoReview’s gaming rating at 39, although their theoretical GPU throughput differs.

Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro both use the Maleoon 935 GPU, with NanoReview listing theoretical performance of 2866.1 GFLOPS for each. Dimensity 8350 uses the Mali-G615 MP6 GPU, listed at 2150.4 GFLOPS.

Their gaming ratings are:

The tie matters: NanoReview does not give any of the three a clear advantage in its current gaming rating. Kirin’s higher theoretical FLOPS figure does not automatically establish better real-world gaming performance.

GPU architecture, graphics drivers, game optimization, supported APIs and thermal behavior affect frame rates. Dimensity 8350 also has more available graphics benchmark results, including 3DMark Steel Nomad Light and Solar Bay, than Kirin 9035 currently has published. Its results therefore provide a broader evidence base for graphics performance, even though the gaming ratings are equal.

Manufacturing and Battery Efficiency

Dimensity 8350 leads battery efficiency with a NanoReview score of 91, compared with 84 for both Kirin processors.

Dimensity 8350 is manufactured by TSMC using a 4nm process, whereas Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro use a 5nm SMIC process. NanoReview assigns Dimensity 8350 a battery rating of 91, with both Kirin chips scoring 84.

This gives Dimensity 8350 a seven-point lead in NanoReview’s battery rating. The difference suggests that it has the stronger efficiency score in the site’s assessment, but it is not a direct measurement of runtime for every smartphone.

Actual battery life also depends on battery size, display power consumption, modem activity, cooling and software optimization. The 4nm process may help Dimensity 8350’s efficiency, but process node alone does not explain every difference in power usage.

RAM, Memory and Storage

Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro tie for maximum listed memory bandwidth, while Dimensity 8350 supports more RAM.

Both Kirin processors use LPDDR5X memory at 4800MHz, with a maximum bandwidth of 76.8GB/s and support for up to 16GB RAM. Dimensity 8350 uses LPDDR5X at 4266MHz, reaching 68.2GB/s and supporting up to 24GB RAM.

Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro list UFS 4.0/UFS 4.1 storage, while Dimensity 8350 lists UFS 4.0. On storage standards and bandwidth, the Kirin chips have a slight specification advantage. Dimensity 8350’s higher maximum RAM capacity, however, may benefit Android devices configured for heavy multitasking.

The maximum supported capacity is not necessarily the memory configuration of a retail smartphone. Actual RAM and storage depend on the phone manufacturer and model.

AI and NPU

Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro use Da Vinci NPUs, while Dimensity 8350 includes the MediaTek APU 780.

NanoReview lists the Da Vinci neural processor for both Kirin chips and the MediaTek APU 780 for Dimensity 8350. It does not provide directly comparable TOPS figures for all three processors.

For that reason, a definitive AI-performance winner cannot be determined from the published specifications alone. Real-world performance depends on supported models, precision, software frameworks and how applications distribute work between the CPU, GPU and NPU.

The presence of a dedicated AI accelerator is useful, but the NPU name does not by itself establish which phone will run a particular AI feature faster.

Camera, ISP and Video

Dimensity 8350 has the highest published maximum camera-resolution specification, while all three processors list 4K60 video recording.

NanoReview lists Dimensity 8350 with support for camera hardware up to 320MP. Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro list 4K60 recording but do not provide equivalent maximum camera-resolution figures on their respective pages.

All three processors are listed with 4K video capture at 60fps. Their listed recording specifications are therefore tied, although the real video quality can vary substantially between phones.

Maximum camera resolution is not a direct measure of image quality. Sensor size, lenses, stabilization, ISP processing, HDR support and manufacturer software have a major impact on final photos and videos.

Display and Connectivity

Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro provide the strongest listed cellular and display specifications, while Dimensity 8350 supports a higher maximum RAM capacity.

Both Kirin chips list maximum display support of 3840×2160, compared with 2960×1440 for Dimensity 8350. Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro use the Balong 6000 modem, with maximum download speeds of 7.5Gbps and upload speeds of 3.5Gbps.

Dimensity 8350 uses the MediaTek T800 modem, with a listed peak download speed of 5.17Gbps. NanoReview does not list an equivalent upload figure on its Dimensity 8350 page.

Wireless connectivity is another difference. Both Kirin processors support Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0. Dimensity 8350 lists Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.4. This gives Kirin the newer listed wireless standards, while Dimensity remains competitive in its broader mid-range feature set.

Benchmark Comparison

Kirin 9035 leads AnTuTu 11 and the available Geekbench multi-core results, while Dimensity 8350 has stronger evidence from a larger set of submitted benchmark tests.

Source: NanoReview’s individual processor pages.

GPU Compute uses Vulkan for the Kirin processors and OpenCL for Dimensity 8350; these scores are not directly comparable.

Kirin 9035 leads the listed AnTuTu 11 results at 1,811,490, compared with 1,725,229 for Kirin 9030 Pro and 1,724,757 for Dimensity 8350. Its lead over the other two is modest rather than overwhelming.

Geekbench 6 shows both Kirin 9035 and Dimensity 8350 at 1,398 single-core points, while Kirin 9035 records the highest multi-core result. However, NanoReview currently reports fewer than three samples for Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9030 Pro, compared with 25 Geekbench CPU tests for Dimensity 8350. The Kirin averages should therefore be considered provisional until more tests are available.

Real-World Performance

Kirin 9035 is the strongest overall option by NanoReview’s current rating, Dimensity 8350 offers better rated battery efficiency, and Kirin 9030 Pro remains close to the newer Kirin model.

Kirin 9035 combines a nine-core CPU, Maleoon 935 graphics, 76.8GB/s memory bandwidth, UFS 4.1 support, Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0. Its AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench results suggest a performance improvement over Kirin 9030 Pro, but the limited sample count means that conclusion is not yet definitive across a wide range of devices.

Dimensity 8350 offers a different balance. It has a capable Cortex-A715 CPU configuration, Mali-G615 MP6 graphics, support for up to 24GB RAM and a higher battery rating. Its more numerous submitted benchmark results provide greater confidence in its current averages.

Kirin 9030 Pro remains similar to Kirin 9035 in GPU hardware, memory bandwidth, storage support and connectivity, but it has lower CPU and overall ratings. For a real purchase, the smartphone’s cooling, software support, battery size and price are important alongside the chipset score.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Kirin 9035

Strengths

• Highest NanoReview overall score.
• Highest CPU rating in this comparison.
• Highest listed AnTuTu 11 result.
• 76.8GB/s memory bandwidth.
• UFS 4.0/UFS 4.1 support.
• Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0.
• 7.5Gbps listed 5G download.

Weaknesses

• Battery score of 84, below Dimensity 8350.
• Maximum RAM listed at 16GB.
• 5nm process rather than 4nm.
• Very limited published benchmark samples.

Dimensity 8350

Strengths

• Highest battery rating at 91.
• Competitive AnTuTu 11 performance.
• 68.2GB/s memory bandwidth.
• Up to 24GB RAM.
• UFS 4.0 support.
• 320MP maximum listed camera capability.
• More submitted benchmark tests than the Kirin chips.

Weaknesses

• Lowest CPU rating in this comparison.
• Lower listed memory bandwidth than the Kirin processors.
• Wi-Fi 6 rather than Wi-Fi 7.
• Lower maximum listed 5G download speed.

Kirin 9030 Pro

Strengths

• 76.8GB/s memory bandwidth.
• Maleoon 935 GPU with 2866.1 GFLOPS listed.
• UFS 4.0/UFS 4.1 support.
• Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0.
• 7.5Gbps listed 5G download.
• Close hardware relationship to Kirin 9035.

Weaknesses

• Lower overall score than Kirin 9035.
• Lower CPU rating and benchmark results than Kirin 9035.
• Battery score of 84.
• Very limited published Geekbench samples.
• Maximum RAM listed at 16GB.

Best Processor for Different Users

Final Verdict and Ranking

Kirin 9035 ranks first overall, Dimensity 8350 ranks second, and Kirin 9030 Pro ranks third according to NanoReview’s current scores.

#1 Kirin 9035

The Kirin 9035 wins with a NanoReview score of 58. It leads the current CPU rating and AnTuTu 11 result, while retaining the high memory bandwidth, modern storage support and connectivity found in Kirin 9030 Pro. The main caution is its limited benchmark sample size.

#2 Dimensity 8350

The Dimensity 8350 scores 57, just one point behind Kirin 9035. Its 91 battery rating, 24GB maximum RAM support, UFS 4.0 and more extensive benchmark sample base make it a credible alternative. It also ties on the gaming rating, despite using a different GPU architecture.

#3 Kirin 9030 Pro

The Kirin 9030 Pro scores 56. It shares Kirin 9035’s Maleoon 935 GPU family, memory bandwidth, storage standards and connectivity specifications, but NanoReview lists lower CPU and overall scores. It remains capable on paper, although available benchmark samples are too limited for a definitive device-wide performance conclusion.

Winner Summary

Final Ranking

1. HiSilicon Kirin 9035 — 58
2. MediaTek Dimensity 8350 — 57
3. HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro — 56

The central takeaway is that Kirin 9035 is the current overall leader, but the difference among these processors is small. Dimensity 8350 has better rated battery efficiency and a larger benchmark sample base, while Kirin 9030 Pro remains close to Kirin 9035 in GPU and memory specifications. More Kirin 9035 device tests are needed before treating its benchmark lead as conclusive.

Sources: NanoReview pages for Kirin 9035, Dimensity 8350, and Kirin 9030 Pro. Data checked October 10, 2026.