Introduction

The Kirin 9050 Pro vs Dimensity 8400 vs Exynos 2400e comparison combines a newer Huawei flagship-class processor with two Android chipsets using different CPU and GPU designs.

Kirin 9050 Pro was announced in September 2026 and is listed by NanoReview with a nine-core CPU, Maleoon 955 graphics and a 3nm process. Dimensity 8400 arrived in December 2024 with eight Cortex-A725 cores and Mali-G720 MP7 graphics, manufactured by TSMC on 4nm. Exynos 2400e launched in September 2024 with a 10-core CPU, Xclipse 940 graphics and Samsung’s 4nm process.

NanoReview’s current overall scores are 63 for Kirin 9050 Pro, 65 for Dimensity 8400 and 71 for Exynos 2400e. These ratings favor Samsung’s chipset overall, but the category scores reveal several important differences: Exynos leads CPU and gaming, Dimensity leads battery efficiency, and Kirin has a high theoretical GPU throughput figure.

Quick Answer

The Samsung Exynos 2400e is the overall winner according to NanoReview, scoring 71 versus 65 for MediaTek Dimensity 8400 and 63 for HiSilicon Kirin 9050 Pro. Exynos leads CPU and gaming ratings, Dimensity 8400 offers the highest battery score, and Kirin 9050 Pro has the highest listed theoretical GPU performance. Kirin’s benchmark results remain provisional because NanoReview has fewer than three samples for several tests.

Specification Comparison

Source: NanoReview’s individual specifications pages. Missing figures mean NanoReview does not list an equivalent value; they should not be interpreted as proof that a feature is unsupported.

CPU Architecture and Performance

Exynos 2400e leads NanoReview’s CPU rating, combining a Cortex-X4 prime core with nine additional cores.

Kirin 9050 Pro uses one Taishan Big core at 3.1GHz, two Taishan cores at 2.7GHz, four at 2.2GHz and two at 1.75GHz. This nine-core configuration is paired with the 3nm process listed by NanoReview.

Dimensity 8400 uses eight Cortex-A725 cores: one at 3.25GHz, three at 3.0GHz and four at 2.1GHz. Its architecture uses the same core family across all eight cores, aiming to balance multithreaded performance with efficiency.

Exynos 2400e uses one Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.11GHz, two Cortex-A720 cores at 2.9GHz, three more A720 cores at 2.6GHz and four Cortex-A520 efficiency cores at 1.95GHz. Its 10-core configuration and 8MB L3 cache provide a strong CPU foundation.

NanoReview gives CPU scores of 72 for Exynos 2400e, 65 for Dimensity 8400 and 64 for Kirin 9050 Pro. Exynos has the highest rating in the source’s assessment, although Kirin’s result could change as more independent benchmark submissions become available.

GPU and Gaming Performance

Exynos 2400e has the highest NanoReview gaming score, while Kirin 9050 Pro and Exynos 2400e have the highest theoretical GPU throughput figures.

Kirin 9050 Pro’s Maleoon 955 GPU is listed at 3225.6 GFLOPS. Dimensity 8400’s Mali-G720 MP7 is listed at 2329.6 GFLOPS, while Exynos 2400e’s Xclipse 940 reaches 3406.8 GFLOPS.

Their current gaming ratings are:

Exynos 2400e leads this category. Its Xclipse 940 GPU uses AMD’s RDNA 3 architecture, while Dimensity 8400 uses the Mali-G720 MP7 and Kirin 9050 Pro uses Maleoon 955.

Theoretical FLOPS are not direct frame-rate measurements. Real gaming performance depends on graphics architecture, drivers, rendering APIs, software optimization and thermal limits. Kirin’s high listed throughput therefore does not override Exynos’s stronger NanoReview gaming rating.

Manufacturing and Battery Efficiency

Dimensity 8400 leads NanoReview’s battery rating with 91 points, compared with 88 for Kirin 9050 Pro and 86 for Exynos 2400e.

Dimensity 8400 uses TSMC’s 4nm process, Exynos 2400e uses Samsung’s 4nm process, and Kirin 9050 Pro is listed with a 3nm process by NanoReview. The battery ratings are 91, 86 and 88, respectively.

This makes Dimensity 8400 the clear winner by NanoReview’s battery metric. A smaller process node does not automatically produce the best battery rating: chip architecture, device power limits, display, modem activity and software optimization also matter.

Actual battery life must be assessed at the phone level. Battery capacity, screen refresh rate, signal strength and cooling can substantially alter endurance even when two phones use the same processor.

RAM, Memory and Storage

Dimensity 8400 and Exynos 2400e tie for maximum listed memory bandwidth, while both support more RAM than Kirin 9050 Pro.

Kirin 9050 Pro uses LPDDR6 and supports up to 16GB RAM, but NanoReview does not list its maximum memory bandwidth. Dimensity 8400 uses LPDDR5X at 4266MHz and offers 68.2GB/s bandwidth with up to 24GB RAM. Exynos 2400e uses LPDDR5X at 4200MHz, with the same listed 68.2GB/s bandwidth and support for up to 24GB RAM.

Storage specifications favor Kirin 9050 Pro, whose page lists UFS 4.1 and UFS 5.0. Dimensity 8400 lists UFS 4.0 and UFS 4.1, while Exynos 2400e lists UFS 3.1 and UFS 4.0. However, actual storage performance depends on the component fitted in the phone and how the manufacturer implements it.

AI and NPU

All three processors include dedicated AI hardware, but NanoReview does not provide comparable TOPS figures for a reliable numerical ranking.

Kirin 9050 Pro uses a Da Vinci NPU, Dimensity 8400 integrates the MediaTek NPU 880, and Exynos 2400e is listed with a dedicated NPU.

The available specifications do not establish a clear AI winner. Real-world AI performance depends on supported models, numerical precision, memory availability, software frameworks and how efficiently applications use the CPU, GPU and NPU together.

Camera, ISP and Video

Exynos 2400e has the strongest listed video capability, while Dimensity 8400 and Exynos 2400e both support cameras up to 320MP.

Exynos 2400e supports 8K recording at 30fps and 4K at 120fps, giving it the strongest listed video-capture specification in this comparison. Dimensity 8400 and Kirin 9050 Pro are both listed with 4K60 capture.

NanoReview lists support for up to 320MP camera hardware on both Dimensity 8400 and Exynos 2400e. It does not list an equivalent maximum camera resolution for Kirin 9050 Pro.

Maximum camera resolution is not the same as photo quality. Sensors, optics, stabilization, ISP processing, HDR capabilities and manufacturer camera software determine the quality of actual photographs and videos.

Display and Connectivity

Exynos 2400e leads in listed 5G download capability and maximum display resolution, while Kirin 9050 Pro offers Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0.

Exynos 2400e lists a maximum display resolution of 3840×2400, versus 3840×2160 for Kirin 9050 Pro and 2960×1440 for Dimensity 8400. These are chipset limits, not guarantees that each phone will use the maximum resolution.

Exynos 2400e’s listed peak 5G download speed is 9.64Gbps, compared with 5.17Gbps for Dimensity 8400. NanoReview does not list an equivalent maximum figure for Kirin 9050 Pro.

Kirin 9050 Pro supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0. Dimensity 8400 lists Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 6.0, while Exynos 2400e lists Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. Therefore, Kirin has newer listed wireless standards, while Exynos leads the published peak cellular-speed specification.

Benchmark Comparison

Exynos 2400e leads overall and in Geekbench CPU performance, Dimensity 8400 offers the highest battery rating, and Kirin 9050 Pro has a higher AnTuTu 11 result than Dimensity 8400 in the current listed samples.

Source: NanoReview’s individual processor pages. GPU Compute APIs differ: Kirin uses Vulkan, Dimensity 8400 uses Vulkan, and Exynos 2400e uses OpenCL. These results are not a perfect like-for-like GPU comparison.

Exynos 2400e leads AnTuTu 11 at 1,977,269, ahead of Dimensity 8400 at 1,948,428 and Kirin 9050 Pro at 1,902,468. The gap is modest, while Geekbench 6 provides a clearer Exynos lead in both single-core and multi-core CPU performance.

Benchmark sample caution: NanoReview reports fewer than three samples for several Kirin 9050 Pro tests. Dimensity 8400 has a broader sample base, and Exynos 2400e has dozens of CPU and AnTuTu tests. The Kirin’s current values should therefore be treated as provisional rather than conclusive.

Real-World Performance

Exynos 2400e is the strongest overall choice by NanoReview’s ratings, Dimensity 8400 offers the best rated battery efficiency, and Kirin 9050 Pro is most notable for its newer listed hardware specifications.

Exynos 2400e combines a Cortex-X4 prime core, 10-core CPU, Xclipse 940 graphics, support for up to 24GB RAM, high-resolution video recording and a strong modem specification. Its overall, CPU and gaming ratings are the highest in this comparison.

Dimensity 8400 is competitive for a mid-range chipset, with eight Cortex-A725 cores, 68.2GB/s memory bandwidth, 24GB RAM support, UFS 4.1 and a 91 battery score. It is particularly attractive for users prioritizing rated battery efficiency and modern memory support.

Kirin 9050 Pro has the most advanced listed memory generation and storage standards, as well as high theoretical GPU throughput. However, its current NanoReview CPU and gaming ratings are lower than those of the Samsung and MediaTek chips, and the very small benchmark sample means its real-world position is not yet established as confidently.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Kirin 9050 Pro

Strengths

• 3nm process listed by NanoReview.
• Maleoon 955 GPU with 3225.6 GFLOPS theoretical performance.
• LPDDR6 memory.
• UFS 4.1/UFS 5.0 listed storage support.
• Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0.
• 7.5Gbps listed 5G download not published as an explicit value on its page.

Weaknesses

• Lowest overall score of the three.
• Battery rating below Dimensity 8400.
• Maximum RAM listed at 16GB.
• Very limited benchmark samples.
• 4K60 maximum listed video capture.

Dimensity 8400

Strengths

• Highest battery rating at 91.
• Competitive AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench multi-core results.
• 68.2GB/s memory bandwidth.
• Up to 24GB RAM.
• UFS 4.0/UFS 4.1.
• 320MP maximum camera capability.

Weaknesses

• Lower CPU and gaming scores than Exynos 2400e.
• Wi-Fi 6 rather than Wi-Fi 7.
• Lower listed peak 5G download speed than Exynos 2400e.
• No listed 8K recording capability.

Exynos 2400e

Strengths

• Highest overall score.
• Highest CPU and gaming ratings.
• Strong Geekbench 6 results.
• Xclipse 940 RDNA 3 graphics.
• 8K30 and 4K120 video recording.
• 320MP camera support.
• Up to 24GB RAM and 68.2GB/s memory bandwidth.
• 9.64Gbps listed 5G download.

Weaknesses

• Lowest battery rating in this comparison.
• Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3.
• Samsung 4nm process versus TSMC 4nm on Dimensity 8400.
• Does not list UFS 4.1 support.

Best Processor for Different Users

Final Verdict and Ranking

Exynos 2400e ranks first overall, Dimensity 8400 second, and Kirin 9050 Pro third according to NanoReview’s current overall scores.

#1 Samsung Exynos 2400e

The Exynos 2400e wins with a score of 71. It leads CPU performance and gaming ratings, scores highest in the available Geekbench CPU results, and supports 8K30 and 4K120 recording. Its Xclipse 940 GPU, 24GB maximum RAM support and 9.64Gbps listed 5G download specification make it the most complete performance package in this comparison according to NanoReview.

#2 MediaTek Dimensity 8400

The Dimensity 8400 scores 65, six points behind Exynos 2400e. Its strongest advantage is battery efficiency, with a score of 91. It also offers competitive multi-core performance, 68.2GB/s memory bandwidth, UFS 4.1 and support for up to 24GB RAM. It is a compelling efficient mid-range option.

#3 HiSilicon Kirin 9050 Pro

The Kirin 9050 Pro scores 63. It offers LPDDR6, UFS 5.0 support, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0 and high theoretical GPU throughput. However, its current CPU and gaming ratings trail the competitors, and the extremely limited benchmark sample base means its position could change as more devices are tested.

Winner Summary

Final Ranking

1. Samsung Exynos 2400e — 71
2. MediaTek Dimensity 8400 — 65
3. HiSilicon Kirin 9050 Pro — 63

The central takeaway is that Exynos 2400e is the strongest overall performer in NanoReview’s current data, Dimensity 8400 is the efficiency-focused alternative, and Kirin 9050 Pro has interesting next-generation memory and storage specifications but insufficient benchmark samples for a firm performance conclusion.

Sources: NanoReview pages for Kirin 9050 Pro, Dimensity 8400, and Exynos 2400e. Data checked October 10, 2026.