Infinix Note 60 vs Samsung Galaxy A37
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 60
- 2.4x better Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 1900 nits)
- 33% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs ~1200 nits)
- 30% larger Battery (6500 mAH vs 5000 mAH)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2340 Pixels)
- 8% higher Front Camera (13 MP vs 12 MP)
- Model Number: X6879
- Special Features: RGB notification light on the back
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A37
- 26% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.06 M vs 840 K)
- 6% higher Max Clock (2.75 GHz vs 2.6 GHz)
- Better Screen Type: Super AMOLED vs AMOLED
- Better Processor: Exynos 1480 vs Dimensity 7400
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- Zoom: Not Confirm
- Digital Zoom: 10 x
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- IP Rating: ip 68
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 60 | Samsung Galaxy A37 |
| Brand | infinix | Samsung |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 102000 PKR | 134000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹30000 | ₹43000 |
| Price USA | $300 | $420 |
| Variants Prices | 8+ 128GB + ? | 12 + 256 GB _______________________________ 12 + 512 GB _______________________________ 12 + 1TB _______________________________ |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 7.5 mm | 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.7 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2340 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 1900 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | ~1200 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Exynos 1480 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4 x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 4 x 2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 840 K | 1.06 M |
| Bootup Time | - | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 +256GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Not Confirm | No |
| Variants | 8+ 128GB | 6/8 + 128 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 +8 MP | 50 + 8 + 5 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | – | 50 MP = Not Confirm |
| Zoom | - | Not Confirm |
| Digital Zoom | - | 10 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO | 12 MP = Not Confirm |
| Front Resolution | 4,160 x 3,120 Pixels | 4000 × 3000 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 5000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Lithium Polymer | Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | No |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | Not Confirm |
| Charging Time | 100% in 60-80 min | Not Confirm |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6879 | — |
| Release Date | 1 March, 2026 | 9 April, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Note Series | A Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , OxygenOS 17 | Android 16, up to 6 major OS updates, One UI 8.5 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 199 grams | 196 g |
| Build | Aluminum ( Frame And Back) | Plastic frame , Glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+) |
| IP Rating | — | ip 68 |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Bright AMOLED display | Fast 120Hz Display 📱 |
| Cons | ❌Only UFS 2.2 storage | No Headphone Jack 🎧 |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy streaming use | Smooth Daily Use 📱 |
| Not Best For | ❌Pro-level photography | Serious Mobile Gaming 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Vivo V70 FE |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works