Infinix Note 60 vs Oppo Reno 14F
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 60
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 18% higher Max Clock (2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz)
- + 14% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs 1400 nits)
- + 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2372 Pixels)
- + 8% larger Battery (6500 mAH vs 6000 mAh)
- + 6% newer Bluetooth (5.4 vs 5.1)
- + Peak Brightness: 4500 nits
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 7400 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
- + AnTuTu Benchmark: 840 K
- + Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K@30 fps 1080p@30/60 fps vs 1080p @ 30 fps
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14F
- + 2.5x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 10% lighter Weight (180 g vs 199 grams)
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- + Includes Card Slot
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 60 | Oppo Reno 14F |
| Brand | infinix | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 102000 PKR | 92000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹30000 | ₹30000 |
| Price USA | $300 | $320 |
| Variants Prices | 8+ 128GB + ? | 8 + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 7.5 mm | 158.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.57 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2372 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | - |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 1400 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4 x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 4 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 840 K | - |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 +256GB | 8+256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Not Confirm | Yes |
| Variants | 8+ 128GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 +8 MP | 50 + 8 + 2 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | – | – |
| Zoom | - | - |
| Digital Zoom | - | - |
| Video Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO | – |
| Front Resolution | 4,160 x 3,120 Pixels | 6,532 × 4,899 Pixel |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 1080p @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 6000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Lithium Polymer | Li-ion |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | - |
| Charging Time | 100% in 60-80 min | Not Confirm |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6879 | CPH2743 |
| Release Date | 1 March, 2026 | 16 July, 2025 |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Note Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , OxygenOS 17 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 199 grams | 180 g |
| Build | Aluminum ( Frame And Back) | Frame Plastic And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Bright AMOLED display | ✅ 120Hz AMOLED 📱 |
| Cons | ❌Only UFS 2.2 storage | ❌ Plastic Frame 🧱 |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy streaming use | 🎯 Daily Use 📱 |
| Not Best For | ❌Pro-level photography | 🚫 Pro Gaming 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Vivo V50Vivo v40infinix Note 60Samsung Galaxy A55 5GTecno Camon 50 Pro |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Pro vs Infinix Note 60
- Tecno Pova 7 5G vs Infinix Note 60
- Infinix Note 60 vs Infinix Note 60 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 vs Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
- Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Infinix Note 60 vs Samsung Galaxy A37
- Oppo Reno 13F vs Oppo Reno 14F
- Infinix Note Edge vs Oppo Reno 14F
- Oppo Reno 14F vs Tecno Pova 8
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











