Honor X9d vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Honor X9d
- 2.2x better Camera (108 + 5 MP vs 50 + 13 MP)
- 20% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1500 nits)
- 19% larger Battery (8300 mAh vs 7000 mAH)
- 15% higher Peak Brightness (6000 nits vs 5200 Nits)
- Front Sensor: 16 MP = Not Confirm
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
- 2.0x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 16 MP)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.15 M vs 977 K)
- 13% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.3)
- 9% higher Max Clock (2.5 GHz ( 2.7 Ghz india ) vs 2.3 GHz)
- 8% lighter Weight (177 g or 193 g vs 193 g)
- 6% higher Screen Resolution (1272 x 2772 pixels vs 1200 x 2640 pixels)
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
- Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
- Digital Zoom: 20 x
- Higher Front Recording: 4K @ 30 fps 1080p @ 30/60/120 fps vs 1080p @ 30 fps
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Model Number: XT2605-1, XT2605-2, XT2605-4
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Honor X9d | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion |
| Brand | Honor | Motorola |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 140000 PKR | 134000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹31000 | ₹33000 |
| Price USA | $480 | $330 |
| Variants Prices | 12+256 GB | 12 +256 GB = ~330 $ | 33,000 INR | 134,000 PKR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.1 x 7.8 mm | 162.8 x 75.6 x 7.2 mm or 8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.79 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1200 x 2640 pixels | 1272 x 2772 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 6000 nits | 5200 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1800 nits | 1500 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz ( 2.7 Ghz india ) |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s | 1 x 2.7 GHz Cortex-A720 – India |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 977 K | 1.15 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 18 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 256 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 128 / 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 108 + 5 MP | 50 + 13 MP |
| Image Resolution | 12,000 × 9,000 pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 108 MP = Samsung HM6 | 50 MP =Sony LYT-710 |
| Zoom | - | — |
| Digital Zoom | - | 20 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Yes | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 16 MP = Not Confirm | — |
| Front Resolution | 4616 × 3462 Pixels | — |
| Front Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 7000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 66 W | 68 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | No |
| Reverse Wireless | Not confirm | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | Not Confirm | 17h 34m |
| Charging Time | Not Confirm | 49m |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | XT2605-1, XT2605-2, XT2605-4 |
| Release Date | 9 October, 2025 | 2 March, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Number Series | Edge Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid-Premium |
| Android OS | Android 15 | Android 16, up to 3 major OS updates |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 177 g or 193 g |
| Build | Frame And Back ( Plastic ) | aluminum frame |
| IP Rating | IP68 / IP69K | IP68/IP69 |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 8300mAh massive battery🔋 | ✅ Massive battery — 7000mAh 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌ Only 66W charging⚡ | ❌ Slow charging — 68W only ⚡ |
| Best For | 🎯 Outdoor/travel users🧳 | 🎯 Battery-life seekers 🔋 |
| Not Best For | 🚫 Gaming enthusiasts🎮 | 🚫 Heavy gamers 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | Vivo V70 FE |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works