Honor X9d vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Honor X9d
- + 2.2x better Camera (108 + 5 MP vs 50 + 8 MP)
- + 71% higher Peak Brightness (6000 nits vs 3500 nits)
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12 + 256 GB vs 8 + 512 GB)
- + 16% lighter Weight (193 g vs 229 grams)
- + Front Sensor: 16 MP = Not Confirm
- + Front Flash: Screen Flash
Reasons to consider the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- + 2.0x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 16 MP)
- + 52% higher Charging Watts (100 W vs 66 W)
- + 20% larger Battery (10,000 mAh vs 8300 mAh)
- + 13% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.3)
- + 13% higher Max Clock (2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz)
- + 11% higher HBM Brightness (2000 nits vs 1800 nits)
- + 7% higher Screen Resolution (1280 × 2772 Pixels vs 1200 x 2640 pixels)
- + Better Processor: Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
- + Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 (256GB / 512GB) , UFS 2.2 (12… vs UFS 3.1
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K@ 30 fps 1080p @ 30/60/120fps vs 1080p @ 30 fps
- + Model Number: 2609FRA74G
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Honor X9d | Redmi Note 17 Pro Max |
| Brand | Honor | Xiaomi |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 140000 PKR | 200000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹31000 | ₹57000 |
| Price USA | $480 | $620 |
| Variants Prices | 12+256 GB | 8+256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.1 x 7.8 mm | 163.4 x 78.3 x 8.6 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.79 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1200 x 2640 pixels | 1280 × 2772 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 6000 nits | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 1 x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s | 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 812 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 977 K | 1 M |
| Bootup Time | - | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 256 GB | 8 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 (256GB / 512GB) , UFS 2.2 (128GB) |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 128GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 108 + 5 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 12,000 × 9,000 pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 108 MP = Samsung HM6 | 50 MP = Samsung S5KJN5< /strong> |
| Zoom | - | — |
| Digital Zoom | - | — |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Yes | LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 16 MP = Not Confirm | — |
| Front Resolution | 4616 × 3462 Pixels | 6532 × 4899 pixels |
| Front Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 66 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | 27 W |
| Reverse Wireless | Not confirm | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | Not Confirm | — |
| Charging Time | Not Confirm | 1:01 hr tested by Nanoreview |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | 2609FRA74G |
| Release Date | 9 October, 2025 | 28 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Number Series | redmi Note |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 229 grams |
| Build | Frame And Back ( Plastic ) | plastic back, plastic frame |
| IP Rating | IP68 / IP69K | IP68 / IP69K |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes / region dependent |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 8300mAh massive battery🔋 | ✅ Massive Battery 🔋 — 9,210–10,000mAh battery |
| Cons | ❌ Only 66W charging⚡ | ❌ Weak Performance 🎮 — Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 |
| Best For | 🎯 Outdoor/travel users🧳 | 🎯 Heavy Battery Users 🔋 |
| Not Best For | 🚫 Gaming enthusiasts🎮 | 🚫 Hardcore Gamers 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Realme Narzo Power vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Realme 16 Pro Plus vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus vs Honor X9d
- Honor X9d vs Samsung Galaxy A57
- Realme 15 Pro vs Honor X9d
- Honor X9d vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
- Honor X9d vs Oppo Reno 16F
- Nothing Phone (4a) vs Honor X9d
- Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Honor X9d vs Honor X8d
- Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Realme P4 Power
- Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Poco X8 Power
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











