Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A27
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 60 Pro
- 3.6x better Charging Watts (90 W vs 25 W)
- 3.2x better Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 1400 nits)
- 30% larger Battery (6500 mAH vs 5000 mAH)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 13% higher Max Clock (2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz)
- 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2340 Pixels)
- 11% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1 M vs 900 K)
- 8% higher Front Camera (13 MP vs 12 MP)
- 6% newer Bluetooth (5.4 vs 5.1)
- HBM Brightness: 1600 nits
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
- Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
- Higher Front Recording: 4K@30 fps 1080p@30/60 fps vs 1080p @ 30 fps
- Model Number: X6878
- Special Features: RGB notification light on the back
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A27
- Better Screen Type: Super AMOLED vs AMOLED
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- Includes Card Slot
- Zoom: Not Confirm
- Digital Zoom: Not Confirm
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- IP Rating: ip 64
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A27 |
| Brand | infinix | Samsung |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 118000 PKR | 120000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹38000 | ₹40000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $400 |
| Variants Prices | 8+ 256GB = 105,000 PKR | 360 $ | 35,000 PKR | 8 + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 7.4 mm | 162.4 x 78.2 x 7.8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.7 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2340 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 1400 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | — |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 2.7GHz Cortex-A720 | 4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1 M | 900 K |
| Bootup Time | - | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Not Confirm | Yes |
| Variants | 8+ 256GB | 6/8 + 128 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 +8 MP | 50 + 5 + 2 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | – | 50 MP = Sony IMX882 / S5KJN1 |
| Zoom | - | Not Confirm |
| Digital Zoom | - | Not Confirm |
| Video Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO | 12 MP = Not Confirm |
| Front Resolution | 4,160 x 3,120 Pixels | 4000 × 3000 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 1080p @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 5000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Lithium Polymer | Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | No |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12h 39m | Not Confirm |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 1:28 hr |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6878 | — |
| Release Date | 1 March, 2026 | 3 July, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Note Series | A Series |
| Category | Uper Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 16, up to 6 major OS updates |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 201 grams | 200 g |
| Build | Aluminum ( Frame And Back) | Plastic frame , Glass back |
| IP Rating | — | ip 64 |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Bright AMOLED display | ✅ 120Hz AMOLED 📱 |
| Cons | ❌Only UFS 2.2 storage | ❌ No Stereo 🔊 |
| Best For | ✅ Power users | 🎯 Media Viewing 📱 |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography | 🚫 Heavy Gaming 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Vivo V70 FE | |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works