Samsung Galaxy A27 Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review

Q: What is Samsung Galaxy A27 price in Pakistan, India, and USD?

8 + 256 GB~120,000 PKR | ~₹40,000 | ~400 $

✪ Samsung Galaxy A27 ✪

Last Time Update : 21 October, 2026

United States

400USD

…i

Pakistan (PKR)

120000PKR

India (INR)

40000INR

Compare Mobiles

Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ Samsung Galaxy A27 ✪

Quick Specs

Display: 6.7 inchesSuper AMOLED120 Hz
Processor: Snapdragon 6 Gen 32.4 GHz
RAM & Storage: 8 + 256 GB
Rear Camera: 50 + 5 + 2 MP
Front Camera: 12 MP
Battery & Charging: 5000 mAH25 W

Full Specification

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

Basic Info

Mobile: Samsung Galaxy A27
Series: A Series
Category: Mid Range
Release Date: 3 July,2026
Year: 2026

Connectivity

SIM: Nano-SIM + E-Sim
Network: 4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi: Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth: 5.1
NFC: Yes
OS: Android 16, up to 6 major OS updates

Body

Dimensions: 162.4 x 78.2 x 7.8 mm
Build: Plastic frame , Glass back
Weight: 200 g

Screen Size: 6.7 inches
Resolution: 1080 x 2340 Pixels
Type: Super AMOLED
Refresh Rate: 120 Hz
Peak Brightness: 1400 nits

Processor Specs

Processor

Snapdragon 6 Gen 3

Max Clock

2.4 GHz

Lithography

4 nm

GPU

Adreno 710

CPU Cores

8 Cores

Antutu v11

900 K

Bootup Time

Not Confirm

Architecture

4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55

RAM & ROM Specs

RAM Memory

8 + 256 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5

Storage Type

UFS 3.1

SD Card

Yes

Variants

6/8 + 128 GB
8 + 256 GB

Camera Specs

Rear Camera

50 + 5 + 2 MP

Front Camera

12 MP

Sensors

Camera Sensors

50 MP = Sony IMX882 / S5KJN1

Front Sensors

12 MP = Not Confirm

Recording FPS

Main Recording

4K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30 fps

Front Recording

1080p @ 30 fps

Zoom

Optical Zoom

Not Confirm

Digital Zoom

Not Confirm

Stabilization

Yes

Flash

LED Flash

Front Flash

Battery Specs

Capacity

5000 mAH

Fast Charging

25 W

Wireless Charging

Battery Type

Li-Ion

Reverse

Reverse Wired

Reverse Wireless

Other

Battery PC Marks

Not Confirm

Charging Time

1:28 hr

Other Specs

Audio & Sensors

IP Rating

ip 64

Speaker

Dual Stereo Speaker

Fingerprint Sensor

Front Finger

Other Sensors

Accelerometer
gyro
proximity
compass
barometer

BASIC INFO

Mobile

Samsung Galaxy A27

Series

A Series

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Official Manufacturer WebsiteExplore the original product information (opens in a new tab)

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 6 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 21 October, 2026

Highlights & Review Of Samsung Galaxy A27

Display Highlights

The Samsung Galaxy A27 comes with a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED panel running at 120Hz, with a 1080 x 2340 resolution and a peak brightness of 1400 nits. At PKR 120,000, it’s the priciest of this group, and its display numbers don’t fully justify that gap. The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (PKR 113,000) uses a similarly sized 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen at the same 120Hz, but pushes brightness higher at 1900 nits, meaning noticeably better sunlight visibility for less money.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 111,000) steps up the refresh rate to 144Hz on a larger 6.78-inch AMOLED panel with a sharper 1208 x 2644 resolution. Its brightness figures are also the strongest here: 700 nits typical, 1600 nits HBM, and 4500 nits peak, giving it the smoothest scrolling and the best outdoor performance of the four, at the lowest price.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 115,000) matches the Note 60 Pro’s 6.78-inch AMOLED, 144Hz, and 1208 x 2644 resolution, and adds HDR10 support that the Samsung Galaxy A27 lacks. Tecno hasn’t disclosed official typical or HBM brightness figures for this panel, so buyers can’t directly compare its real-world sunlight performance against the Note 60 Pro’s confirmed numbers.

On paper, the A27’s 120Hz refresh rate and 1400 nits brightness are the weakest combination in this bracket, while costing the most.

Verdict: The Infinix Note 60 Pro has the best all-round display here, combining a faster 144Hz refresh rate with confirmed high brightness numbers at a lower price than the A27. Buyers prioritizing screen quality should look past the Samsung Galaxy A27 unless they specifically want Samsung’s software and camera ecosystem.

Performance Highlights

The Samsung Galaxy A27 runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), an octa-core setup with 4x 2.4GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x 1.8GHz Cortex-A55 cores paired with an Adreno 710 GPU, scoring 900K on AnTuTu v11. At PKR 120,000, it’s the only phone here with a confirmed, publicly listed AnTuTu figure, which makes direct scoring comparisons against the other three difficult since none of their AnTuTu results have been disclosed yet.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (PKR 113,000) uses Samsung’s own Exynos 1580 (4×2.6GHz Cortex-A720 cores plus a 2.9GHz prime core and 4x Cortex-A520 efficiency cores) with an Xclipse 540 GPU. No official AnTuTu score has been published for this chip, so buyers can’t weigh it numerically against the A27’s 900K.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 111,000) is built around the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4nm), pairing 1x 2.7GHz and 3x 2.4GHz Cortex-A720 cores with 4x 1.8GHz Cortex-A520 cores and an Adreno 810 GPU, a newer GPU architecture than the Samsung Galaxy A27’s Adreno 710. Its AnTuTu score also hasn’t been confirmed publicly.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 115,000) runs the Dimensity 7400 Ultimate (4nm), an octa-core chip with 4x 2.6GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x 2.0GHz Cortex-A55 cores backed by a Mali-G615 MC2 GPU, again with no disclosed AnTuTu figure.

On paper, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 in the Note 60 Pro and the Adreno 810 GPU stand out as the newest silicon in this group for gaming headroom, while the Samsung Galaxy A27’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 is the more budget-tier chip among the four despite its higher price.

Verdict: Without published AnTuTu scores for three of the four phones, the Galaxy A27’s 900K is the only verifiable number here, but its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 and Adreno 710 look outdated next to the Note 60 Pro’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, making the Infinix the stronger pick for anyone prioritizing raw processing power at a lower price.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Samsung Galaxy A27 ships in 8GB + 256GB configuration at PKR 120,000, using LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 storage, with microSD card support for extra storage. It’s the only phone in this comparison that offers expandable storage, which matters if 256GB isn’t enough long term.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (PKR 113,000) matches the A27’s 8GB + 256GB setup and also uses LPDDR5 RAM with UFS 3.1 storage, but it has no card slot, meaning storage is fixed at purchase. Since both phones use the same RAM and storage generation, real-world app-switching and load times should feel similar, but the A56 loses out on expandability while costing less.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 111,000) jumps to 12GB + 256GB, giving it 4GB more RAM than either Samsung for the lowest price of the four. Its storage runs on UFS 2.2, a generation behind the Samsung phones’ UFS 3.1, which typically means slower sustained read and write speeds despite the RAM advantage. Like the A56, it has no microSD support.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 115,000) also offers 12GB + 256GB, but its storage is listed simply as UFS without a confirmed version number, so buyers can’t verify whether it matches the Note 60 Pro’s UFS 2.2 or the Samsungs’ faster UFS 3.1. It has no card slot either.

Between the two Samsungs, the newer UFS 3.1 standard should give a real speed edge over the Note 60 Pro’s UFS 2.2, even with less RAM.

Verdict: The Infinix Note 60 Pro offers the most RAM for the least money, but its UFS 2.2 storage is a genuine downgrade against the Samsung Galaxy A27 and A56’s UFS 3.1. Buyers who care about storage speed over raw RAM capacity should lean toward the Samsung Galaxy A27, especially since it’s the only one here with microSD expansion.

Camera Highlights

The Samsung Galaxy A27 carries a 50 + 5 + 2 MP triple rear setup with OIS on the main sensor, which fsl-specs.com identifies as a Sony IMX882 / S5KJN1, plus a 12MP front camera. At PKR 120,000, it’s the only phone here with a confirmed main sensor name alongside its OIS. Rear video tops out at 4K@30fps, while the front camera is limited to 1080p@30fps.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (PKR 113,000) uses a 50MP (Sony IMX906) main camera with OIS and f/1.8, paired with a 12MP f/2.2 ultrawide (Sony IMX258) and a 5MP f/2.4 macro, plus a 12MP front camera. Its ultrawide resolution beats the A27’s 5MP unit, and its front camera records up to 4K@30fps with 10-bit HDR, well ahead of the A27’s 1080p-only selfie video.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 111,000) drops the macro entirely for a simpler 50MP f/1.6 main with OIS and an 8MP f/2.2 ultrawide, backed by a 13MP front camera. Its main camera video pushes further than the rest, hitting 1080p@120fps alongside 4K@30fps, useful for slow-motion capture.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 115,000), the cheapest phone here, is the only one with real optical zoom: a 50MP f/1.8 main (confirmed Sony LYT-700C sensor) with OIS, a 50MP f/2.4 telephoto with 3x optical zoom and its own OIS, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 50MP autofocus front camera, the highest-resolution and only autofocus-equipped selfie camera of the four.

Sensor names are verified only for the Samsung Galaxy A27’s main sensor, the A56’s main and ultrawide sensors, and the Camon 50 Ultra’s main sensor; the rest remain undisclosed.

Verdict: The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra offers the most versatile camera hardware, being the only phone with genuine telephoto zoom, at the lowest price of the four, making the Samsung Galaxy A27’s basic setup hard to justify at PKR 120,000 unless brand ecosystem matters more than camera flexibility.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Samsung Galaxy A27 packs a 5000mAh battery with 25W wired charging, no wireless charging, and no reverse charging, taking roughly 1 hour 28 minutes for a full charge. At PKR 120,000, it has the smallest battery and the slowest charging speed of the four phones compared here, which is a tough combination to justify at the highest price point.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (PKR 113,000) matches the A27’s 5000mAh capacity but nearly doubles the charging speed at 45W, reaching 65% in 30 minutes and a full charge in about 68 minutes. It also skips wireless charging, so the practical advantage over the A27 comes down entirely to charging speed, not battery size.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 111,000) steps up significantly with a 6500mAh battery, the largest of the group, alongside 90W wired charging and 30W wireless charging, plus bypass charging support for sustained gaming sessions. That combination of size and charging speed makes it the clear standout on paper, and it’s also the cheapest phone here.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 115,000) also carries a 6500mAh battery with bypass charging, but its wired speed tops out at 45W, the same as the A56 and well behind the Note 60 Pro’s 90W. No wireless charging is offered.

Between the two large-battery phones, the Note 60 Pro’s 90W wired and 30W wireless charging give it a meaningful real-world edge over the Camon 50 Ultra’s 45W-only setup, even though both share the same 6500mAh capacity.

Verdict: The Infinix Note 60 Pro offers the best battery package by a wide margin, combining the largest capacity with the fastest wired and only wireless charging in this group, at the lowest price. The Samsung Galaxy A27’s 5000mAh battery and 25W charging look outdated next to it.

Final Verdict

Across five categories, the Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 111,000) comes out on top more often than any other phone in this group. It wins the Display Review with its 144Hz refresh rate and confirmed 4500 nits peak brightness, offers the most RAM at 12GB, and dominates the Battery Review with a 6500mAh cell, 90W wired charging, and 30W wireless charging, features none of the other three phones match. Its only real weakness is UFS 2.2 storage, a generation behind the two Samsung phones’ UFS 3.1, and an unconfirmed AnTuTu score in the Processor Review despite using the newer Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chipset.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 115,000) takes the Camera Review outright, being the only phone here with a genuine 3x optical zoom telephoto and a 50MP autofocus front camera, and it shares the Note 60 Pro’s large 6500mAh battery, though its charging tops out at 45W with no wireless option.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (PKR 113,000) doesn’t win any single category outright but stays competitive throughout, pairing UFS 3.1 storage and LPDDR5 RAM with a bright 1900 nits display and 45W charging, making it the safer all-rounder if brand support and software updates matter more than raw specs.

The Samsung Galaxy A27 (PKR 120,000) loses ground in every section against all three rivals despite being the most expensive phone in this comparison. Its 120Hz display, Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, 25W charging, and basic triple camera all trail the competition, with microSD expansion its only clear advantage.

Bottom line: The Infinix Note 60 Pro is the strongest overall pick in this price bracket, and the Samsung Galaxy A27 is difficult to recommend at PKR 120,000 when cheaper phones outperform it in nearly every measurable spec.

Ranking

Infinix Note 60 Pro – PKR 111,000
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra – PKR 115,000
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G – PKR 113,000
Samsung Galaxy A27 – PKR 120,000