Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 60 Pro
- + 2.0x better Charging Watts (90 W vs 45 W)
- + 88% higher Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 2400 Nits)
- + 23% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs 1300 Nits)
- + 11% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1 M vs 900 K)
- + Better Processor: Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Dimensity 7400
- + Model Number: X6878
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- + 3.8x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12+256 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- + 11% lighter Weight (178 g vs 201 grams)
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- + Zoom: 3 x
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra |
| Brand | infinix | Tecno |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 118000 PKR | 120000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹38000 | ₹40000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $420 |
| Variants Prices | 8+ 256GB = 105,000 PKR | 360 $ | 35,000 PKR | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 7.4 mm | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1208 x 2644 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 2400 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 1300 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Dimensity 7400 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 2.7GHz Cortex-A720 | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1 M | 900 K |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 12+256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Not Confirm | No |
| Variants | 8+ 256GB | 8 + 256GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 +8 MP | 50+50+8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | – | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown |
| Zoom | - | 3 x |
| Digital Zoom | - | - |
| Video Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO | 50 MP=Unknown |
| Front Resolution | 4,160 x 3,120 Pixels | 8160 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K@ 60 fps |
| Front Flash | - | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Lithium Polymer | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12h 39m | 11h 23m |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6878 | — |
| Release Date | 1 March, 2026 | 2 March, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Note Series | Camon Series |
| Category | Uper Mid Range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 17, HiOS 17 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 201 grams | 178 g |
| Build | Aluminum ( Frame And Back) | glass back , plastic frame |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Bright AMOLED display | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) |
| Cons | ❌Only UFS 2.2 storage | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) |
| Best For | ✅ Power users | ✅ Mobile Photography |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography | ❌ Budget Buyers |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Vivo V70 FE | Infinix Note 60 Pro |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V70 FE
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Realme 15 Pro
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V60
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Infinix GT 20 Pro
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs Infinix Note 60 Pro
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Infinix Note 60 vs Infinix Note 60 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs vivo V70 FE
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A56
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Realme 15 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Nothing Phone 3A
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Infinix GT 30
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs vivo V40
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15F
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15F
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











