Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 2.2x better Camera (108+ 8 MP vs 50 +8 MP)
- 72% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.7 M vs 990 K)
- 56% higher Charging Watts (70 W vs 45 W)
- 50% more RAM Memory (12+256 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- 29% higher Max Clock (3.35 GHz vs 2.6 GHz)
- Better Processor: Dimensity 8350 vs Dimensity 7400
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 2.2
- Zoom: 2 X
- Front Sensor: 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0
- Higher Front Recording: 4K@30/60fps 1080p@30/60fps vs 2K@ 30 fps 1080p@ 60 fps
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- 50% higher Digital Zoom (15 x vs 10 X)
- 14% higher HBM Brightness (1600 Nits vs 1400 nits)
- 8% larger Battery (6500 mAh vs 6000 mAH)
- IP Rating: IP68 / IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Brand | Tecno | Tecno |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 140000🚫 PKR | 150000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹35000 | ₹50000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $500 |
| Variants Prices | 12+256GB = | 8 + 256GB =50,000 INR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 160 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm | 162.5 x 77.3 x 7.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.67 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1260 x 2800 Pixels | 1208 x 2644 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 4500 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1400 nits | 1600 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 7400 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.35 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1x 3.35 GHz Cortex A715 | 4 × 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.7 M | 990 K |
| Bootup Time | 28s | 24s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+256GB | 8 + 256 GB 12 + 256 / 512 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 108+ 8 MP | 50 +8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 12000 x 9000 | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 108 MP = Samsung HM6 8 MP = GalaxyCore GC08A8 | 50 MP = Sony LYT 700C |
| Zoom | 2 X | - |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | 15 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 | — |
| Front Resolution | 4160 x 3120 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30/60fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6000 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 70 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | 10 W |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12 Hours 30 Mints | 10h 40m |
| Charging Time | 0% to 50% in ~ 18 minutes | 1h 15m |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | LJ9 | LK7 |
| Release Date | 20 July, 2025 | 18 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2024 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Pova Series | Pova Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 16 - HIOS 16 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 189 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 / IP69K |
| Special Features | Status light LED (on the back) | Matrix display (on the back) Camera Module |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors |
| ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Dimensity 8350 Ultimate performance | 144Hz AMOLED Display ✅ |
| Cons | ❌Weak ultrawide camera | 45W Charging Speed ❌ |
| Best For | ✅ long battery backup | Mobile Gaming 🎯 |
| Not Best For | ❌flagship-level camera quality | Flagship Performance 🚫 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Unboxing | — | |
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works