Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- + 2.2x better Camera (108+ 8 MP vs 50 + 8 MP)
- + 56% higher Charging Watts (70 W vs 45 W)
- + 5% lighter Weight (188 g vs 198 grams)
- + Peak Brightness: 4500 nits
- + Zoom: 2 X
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Mid-Range
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
- + 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.1 M vs 1.7 M)
- + 14% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs 1400 nits)
- + 8% larger Battery (6500 mAH vs 6000 mAH)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8400 vs Dimensity 8350
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Infinix GT 50 Pro |
| Brand | Tecno | infinix |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 140000🚫 PKR | 160000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹35000 | ₹35000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $400 |
| Variants Prices | 12+256GB = | 12+ 256GB = 152,000 PKR | 370 $ | 34,000 INR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 160 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm | 162.4 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.67 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1260 x 2800 Pixels | 1208 x 2644 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | - |
| HBM Brightness | 1400 nits | 1600 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 8400 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.35 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1x 3.35 GHz Cortex A715 | 1 x 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G720 (7-core) |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.7 M | 2.1 M |
| Bootup Time | 28s | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 12 +256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+256GB | 12+ 256GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 108+ 8 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 12000 x 9000 | 8160 x 6144 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 108 MP = Samsung HM6 8 MP = GalaxyCore GC08A8 | 50 MP = Sony IMX896 (OIS) |
| Zoom | 2 X | - |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | 10 X |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Front Resolution | 4160 x 3120 Pixels | 4128 x 3096 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30/60fps | 4K@30 fps |
| Front Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6000 mAH | 6500 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 70 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | 10 W |
| Reverse Wireless | No | 5 W |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12 Hours 30 Mints | - |
| Charging Time | 0% to 50% in ~ 18 minutes | 100% in 45-60 min |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | LJ9 | X6891 |
| Release Date | 20 July, 2025 | 25 April, 2026 |
| Year | 2024 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Pova Series | GT Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | - |
| Android OS | Android 16 - HIOS 16 | Android 17 , XOS 17 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 198 grams |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Plastic ( Frame And Back) |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | Status light LED (on the back) | RGB notification light on the back |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors |
| Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Dimensity 8350 Ultimate performance | ✅Dimensity 8400 |
| Cons | ❌Weak ultrawide camera | ❌No optical zoom |
| Best For | ✅ long battery backup | ✅ Heavy gamers |
| Not Best For | ❌flagship-level camera quality | ❌Zoom photography fans |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Tecno Pova 8 Pro | Realme GT 7T |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs vivo V70
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 7 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











