Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Honor Win
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- + 75% higher Peak Brightness (3500 nits vs 2000 nits)
- + 67% higher Zoom (5 x vs 3x)
- + Official Brand Link: , https://www.mi.com/global/,
- + Price: 390000
- + Price India: 120000
- + Price USA: 1100
- + Better Screen Type: LTPO AMOLED vs AMOLED
- + Camera Sensor: 50 MP = Omnivision 950L LightHunte…
- + Higher Video Recording: 8K@30 fps 4K@120 fps 1080p@960fps vs 4K @ 60fps 1080p @ 60/120/240fps
- + Front Sensor: 50 MP = Omnivision OV50M
- + Front Flash: Screen Flash
- + Special Features: Secondary 2.9″ LTPO AMOLED R…
Reasons to consider the Honor Win
- + 5.0x better HBM Brightness (6000 nits vs 1200 nits)
- + 54% higher Refresh Rate (185 Hz vs 120 Hz (Both))
- + 33% larger Battery (10,000 mAh vs 7500 mAh)
- + 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- + 6% higher Screen Resolution (1272 x 2800 pixels vs 1200 x 2608 Pixels / 596 x 976 (secon…)
- + IP Rating: IP68 / IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | Honor Win |
| Brand | Xiaomi | Honor |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | — |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 390000 PKR | — |
| Price India | ₹120000 | — |
| Price USA | $1100 | — |
| Variants Prices | 16 + 512 GB 16 + 1 TB | 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.9 x 77.6 x 8.0 mm | 163.1 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.9 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1200 x 2608 Pixels / 596 x 976 (secondary) | 1272 x 2800 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz (Both) | 185 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 3500 nits | 2000 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1200 nits | 6000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | Octa-core | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L | 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 4 M | 4.03 M |
| Bootup Time | - | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16 + 1 TB | 16 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 512GB | 16 + 512GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 50 MP | 50 + 50 + 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Omnivision 950L LightHunter | — |
| Zoom | 5 x | 3x |
| Digital Zoom | - | — |
| Video Recording | 8K@30 fps | 4K @ 60fps |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP = Omnivision OV50M | — |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 60fps | 4K @ 30/60fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | 80 W |
| Reverse Charging | 22.5W | 27 W |
| Reverse Wireless | Not Confirm | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | (50% in 27 min) |
| Charging Time | 45-50 Mints ( 0-100% ) | 1:05 hr - Nanoreview |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | 2509FPN0BC | AAP-AN00 |
| Release Date | 25 September, 2025 | 1 January, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Xiaomi Number | Win Series |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 , HyperOS 4 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 219 grams | 229 grams |
| Build | Aluminium Alloy +Glass back | Glass back, Metal frame |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 / IP69K |
| Special Features | Secondary 2.9″ LTPO AMOLED “Dynamic Back Display”. | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes / region dependent |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Proximity sensor | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 7500mAh Battery | ✅🔋 Massive 10,000mAh battery |
| Cons | ❌ Heavy 219g | ❌⚖️ Heavy at 229g |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy Gaming | 🎯🎮 Heavy gamers |
| Not Best For | ❌ Compact Phone Fans | 🚫🪶 Lightweight-phone lovers |
| Related Media | ||
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Realme GT 8 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- IQOO 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max
- IQOO 15 Ultra vs Honor Win
- Honor Win vs OnePlus 15
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Honor Win
- Honor Win vs Redmi K100 Pro Max
- Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 17
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











