Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Redmi Note 17 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 60 Pro
- 34% higher Charging Watts (90 W vs 67 W)
- 33% more RAM Memory (8 + 256 GB vs 6 + 256 GB)
- 29% higher Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 3500 nits)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 15% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1 M vs 870 K)
- 13% higher Max Clock (2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz)
- 10% lighter Weight (201 grams vs 223 grams)
- 6% newer Bluetooth (5.4 vs 5.1)
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
- Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
- Higher Video Recording: 4K@30 fps 1080p@30/60/120 fps vs 1080p @ 30
- Front Sensor: 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO
- Higher Front Recording: 4K@30 fps 1080p@30/60 fps vs 1080p @ 30
- Special Features: RGB notification light on the back
Reasons to consider the Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 28% larger Battery (8340 mAh vs 6500 mAH)
- 23% higher Front Camera (16 MP vs 13 MP)
- 13% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1600 nits)
- 6% higher Screen Resolution (1280 × 2772 Pixels vs 1208 x 2644 Pixels)
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- IP Rating: IP68 / IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Redmi Note 17 Pro |
| Brand | infinix | Xiaomi |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 118000 PKR | 120000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹38000 | ₹35000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $500 |
| Variants Prices | 8+ 256GB = 105,000 PKR | 360 $ | 35,000 PKR | 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 7.4 mm | 2607DRA18G |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1280 × 2772 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 1 x 2.7GHz Cortex-A720 | 4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1 M | 870 K |
| Bootup Time | - | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 6 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Not Confirm | No |
| Variants | 8+ 256GB | 6 + 128/256 |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 +8 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | – | 50 MP = Samsung S5KJN5< /strong> |
| Zoom | - | — |
| Digital Zoom | - | — |
| Video Recording | 4K@30 fps | 1080p @ 30 |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13AO | — |
| Front Resolution | 4,160 x 3,120 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 1080p @ 30 |
| Front Flash | - | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 8340 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Lithium Polymer | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | 22.5 W |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12h 39m | — |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | — |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6878 | 2609FRA74G |
| Release Date | 1 March, 2026 | 28 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Note Series | redmi Note |
| Category | Uper Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 201 grams | 223 grams |
| Build | Aluminum ( Frame And Back) | plastic back, plastic frame |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 / IP69K |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes / region dependent |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Bright AMOLED display | ✅ Huge 8340mAh Battery 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌Only UFS 2.2 storage | ❌ Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ⚙️ |
| Best For | ✅ Power users | 🎯 Long Battery Life 🔋 |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography | 🚫 Hardcore Gaming 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Vivo V70 FE | Vivo V70 FE |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works