Samsung Galaxy A57 vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A57
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.36 M vs 1.15 M)
- 16% higher Max Clock (2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz ( 2.7 Ghz india ))
- Better Screen Type: Super AMOLED vs AMOLED
- Better Processor: Exynos 1680 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
- Zoom: Not Confirm
- Front Sensor: 12 MP = Not Confirm
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
- 2.7x better Peak Brightness (5200 Nits vs 1900 nits)
- 2.7x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 12 MP)
- 51% higher Charging Watts (68 W vs 45 W)
- 50% more RAM Memory (12 + 256 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- 40% larger Battery (7000 mAH vs 5000 mAH)
- 25% higher HBM Brightness (1500 nits vs ~1200 nits)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 18% higher Screen Resolution (1272 x 2772 pixels vs 1080 x 2340 Pixels)
- Better Digital Zoom: 20 x vs Not Confirm
- Front Flash: Screen Flash
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Samsung Galaxy A57 | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion |
| Brand | Samsung | Motorola |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 148000 PKR | 134000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹49000 | ₹33000 |
| Price USA | $500 | $330 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256 GB _______________________________ | 12 +256 GB = ~330 $ | 33,000 INR | 134,000 PKR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 161.5 × 76.8 × 6.9 mm | 162.8 x 75.6 x 7.2 mm or 8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inches | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1080 x 2340 Pixels | 1272 x 2772 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 1900 nits | 5200 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~1200 nits | 1500 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Exynos 1680 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz ( 2.7 Ghz india ) |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1×2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1 x 2.7 GHz Cortex-A720 – India |
| GPU | Xclipse 550 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.36 M | 1.15 M |
| Bootup Time | Not Confirm | 18 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 128/256 GB | 8 + 128 / 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 12 + 5 MP | 50 + 13 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony IMX906 | 50 MP =Sony LYT-710 |
| Zoom | Not Confirm | — |
| Digital Zoom | Not Confirm | 20 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | LED Flash | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 12 MP = Not Confirm | — |
| Front Resolution | 4000 × 3000 Pixels | — |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 5000 mAH | 7000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 68 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | Not Confirm | 17h 34m |
| Charging Time | Not Confirm | 49m |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | SM-A576B | XT2605-1, XT2605-2, XT2605-4 |
| Release Date | 9 April, 2026 | 2 March, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | A Series | Edge Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid-Premium |
| Android OS | Android 17, up to 5 major OS updates | Android 16, up to 3 major OS updates |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 177 g or 193 g |
| Build | Aluminum frame , Glass back | aluminum frame |
| IP Rating | ip 68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | 120Hz AMOLED Display 📱 | ✅ Massive battery — 7000mAh 🔋 |
| Cons | No Front Autofocus 🤳 | ❌ Slow charging — 68W only ⚡ |
| Best For | Media Consumption 🎬 | 🎯 Battery-life seekers 🔋 |
| Not Best For | Hardcore Gaming 🎮 | 🚫 Heavy gamers 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Vivo V70 FE | |
| Unboxing | — | |
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works