Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Realme 15 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
- Zoom: 3 x
- Includes Wireless Charging
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- Category: Mid-Range
Reasons to consider the Realme 15 Pro
- 2.7x better Peak Brightness (6500 nits vs 2400 Nits)
- 78% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 45 W)
- 38% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1300 Nits)
- 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.1 M vs 900 K)
- 8% larger Battery (7000 mAH vs 6500 mAh)
- 8% higher Max Clock (2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz)
- 6% higher Screen Resolution (1280 x 2800 Pixels vs 1208 x 2644 Pixels)
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Dimensity 7400
- Digital Zoom: 20 x
- Front Flash: Not Confirm
- Model Number: RMX5101
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Realme 15 Pro |
| Brand | Tecno | Realme |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 120000 PKR | 130000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹40000 | ₹38000 |
| Price USA | $420 | $400 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed | 8 + 128 GB 8 + 256 GB 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm | 162.3 x 76.2 x 7.7 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.8 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1280 x 2800 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 2400 Nits | 6500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1300 Nits | 1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 1 x 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MP2 | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 900 K | 1.1 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 24 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 256GB | 8 + 128GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+50+8 MP | 50 + 50 + MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown | 50 MP = Sony Exmor-RS IMX896 |
| Zoom | 3 x | - |
| Digital Zoom | - | 20 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@ 30 fps | 4K @ 60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Unknown | 50 MP = OmniVision OV50D |
| Front Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@ 60 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | Not Confirm |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon = Li-Ion (India, China) |
| Wireless Charging | No | - |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | - |
| Reverse Wireless | No | - |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 11h 23m | 15 h 40 m |
| Charging Time | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) | ~70-80m ( 0% To 100% ) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | RMX5101 |
| Release Date | 2 March, 2026 | 30 July, 2025 |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | Realme Number |
| Category | Mid-Range | - |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 17 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 187 g |
| Build | glass back , plastic frame | ( Aluminum Frame And Plastic Back) |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | – | Always-On Display, DC Dimming |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 v |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) | ✅ Massive Battery — 🔋 7000 mAh capacity |
| Cons | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) | ❌ Mid Chipset — 🧠 Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Battery Endurance Users — 🔋 7000mAh all-day |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | 🚫 Heavy Gamers — 🧠 mid-tier chipset limits |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A57 |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works