Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15F
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12+256 GB vs 8+256 GB)
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 18% higher Max Clock (2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz)
- + 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2372 Pixels)
- + 9% lighter Weight (178 g vs 195 g)
- + Peak Brightness: 2400 Nits
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 7400 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
- + Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15F
- + 78% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 45 W)
- + 17% higher Zoom (3.5 x vs 3 x)
- + 8% higher HBM Brightness (1400 nits vs 1300 Nits)
- + 8% larger Battery (7000 mAh vs 6500 mAh)
- + Includes Card Slot
- + Front Flash: Screen Flash
- + Model Number: CPH2801
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Oppo Reno 15F |
| Brand | Tecno | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 120000 PKR | 117000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹40000 | ₹38000 |
| Price USA | $420 | $400 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed | 8 + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm | 158.2 x 74.9 x 8.1 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.57 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2372 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 2400 Nits | - |
| HBM Brightness | 1300 Nits | 1400 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 4 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MP2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 900 K | 865 K |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 8+256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | Yes |
| Variants | 8 + 256GB | 8 + 256/128 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+50+8 MP | 50 + 8 + 2 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown | – |
| Zoom | 3 x | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | - | - |
| Video Recording | 4K@ 30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Unknown | – |
| Front Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@ 60 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 11h 23m | - |
| Charging Time | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) | 65-75 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | CPH2801 |
| Release Date | 2 March, 2026 | 9 January, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 195 g |
| Build | glass back , plastic frame | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | – | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) | ✅ 7000mAh huge battery 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) | ❌ Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (mid-tier) ⚙️ |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Long battery life 🔋 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | 🚫 Flagship performance seekers ⚙️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V70 FE
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Realme 15 Pro
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V60
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Oppo Reno 15F vs Oppo Reno 16F
- Oppo Reno 15F vs Oppo Reno 13F
- Oppo Reno 15 vs Oppo Reno 15F
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15F
- Oppo Reno 15F vs Samsung Galaxy A36
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











