Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V60
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2392 Pixels)
- + 7% lighter Weight (178 g vs 192 g or 201 g)
- + Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
Reasons to consider the vivo V60
- + 2.1x better Peak Brightness (5000 nits vs 2400 Nits)
- + 2.0x better Charging Watts (90 W vs 45 W)
- + 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.1 M vs 900 K)
- + 15% higher HBM Brightness (1500 nits vs 1300 Nits)
- + 8% higher Max Clock (2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz)
- + Better Processor: Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Dimensity 7400
- + Digital Zoom: 100 x
- + Front Flash: Not confirm
- + Model Number: V2511
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | vivo V60 |
| Brand | Tecno | Vivo |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 120000 PKR | 144000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹40000 | ₹45000 |
| Price USA | $420 | $470 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed | 8GB + 256GB 12GB + 256GB 12GB + 512GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm | 163.5 x 77 x 7.5 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.77 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2392 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 2400 Nits | 5000 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1300 Nits | 1500 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 1×2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MP2 | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 900 K | 1.1 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 18 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 256GB | 8GB + 256GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+50+8 MP | 50 + 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown | 50 MP = Sony IMX766 |
| Zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Digital Zoom | - | 100 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@ 30 fps | 4K @30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Ring Light |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Unknown | 50 MP = Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Front Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@ 60 fps | 4K@ 30/60fps |
| Front Flash | - | Not confirm |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 11h 23m | ~13 hours |
| Charging Time | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) | 50m-60m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | V2511 |
| Release Date | 2 March, 2026 | 19 August, 2025 |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | Vivo V Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 17 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 192 g or 201 g |
| Build | glass back , plastic frame | plastic frame, plastic back / glass back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | – | Ring Light |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 / Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) | ✅ 6500mAh Battery |
| Cons | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) | ❌ UFS 2.2 Storage |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | ✅ Portrait Photography |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | ❌ Wireless Charging Users |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Vivo V70 |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V70 FE
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Realme 15 Pro
- OnePlus Nord CE 6 vs vivo V60
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs vivo V60
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- vivo V60 vs vivo V50
- vivo V60 vs vivo V70
- vivo V60 vs Realme 15 Pro
- vivo V60 vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15F
- vivo V60 vs Samsung Galaxy A56
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











