Nothing Phone (4a) vs Oppo Reno 16F
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Nothing Phone (4a)
- 7.0x better Digital Zoom (70 x vs 10 x)
- 14% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs 1400 nits)
- 13% higher Screen Resolution (1224 × 2720 Pixels vs 1080 x 2372 pixels)
- 11% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1.1 M vs 990 K)
- 8% higher Max Clock (2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz)
- Price India: 41000
- Price USA: 450
- Variants Prices: 8 + 256 GB| ~₹38,000 | ~$ 400 | 170,0…
- Better Screen Type: Flexible AMOLED vs Amoled
- Peak Brightness: 4500 nits
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Mediatek Dimensity 7300
- Processor Link: https://fsl-specs.com/mobile-processo…
- Camera Sensor: 50 MP = Samsung GN9 50 MP = Samsung S…
- Front Sensor: –
- Special Features: 1-Back panel with 63 mini-LEDs (Glyph…
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16F
- 60% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 50 W)
- 56% higher Front Camera (50 MP vs 32 MP)
- 38% larger Battery (7000 mAh vs 5080)
- Includes Card Slot
- Higher Front Recording: 4K @ 30 fps 1080p @ 30 fps vs 1080p @ 30 fps
- Includes Reverse Charging
- IP Rating: IP68/IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Nothing Phone (4a) | Oppo Reno 16F |
| Brand | Nothing | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 170000 PKR | 150000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹41000 | — |
| Price USA | $450 | — |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256 GB 12 + 256 GB | — |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 164 x 77.6 x 8.6 mm | 158.2 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm or 8.6 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.57 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1224 × 2720 Pixels | 1080 x 2372 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Flexible AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | — |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 1400 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Processor Link | Visit | — |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 × 2.7 GHz Cortex-A720 | 4 x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.1 M | 990 K |
| Bootup Time | 21 s | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | Yes |
| Variants | 8 + 128 GB | 8 + 128 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Samsung GN9 | — |
| Zoom | 3.5 x | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 70 x | 10 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | LED Flash | Multi-focus LED flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | — |
| Front Resolution | 6532 × 4899 MP | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 5080 | 7000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 50 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 1:02 hr |
| Charging Time | 1h ( 0%→100% ) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | A069 | CPH2859 |
| Release Date | 5 March, 2026 | 13 July, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Nothing a | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 ( up to 2 major OS updates ) | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 195 g |
| Build | Frame Plastic And Glass Back | glass back and plastic back |
| IP Rating | — | IP68/IP69K |
| Special Features | 1-Back panel with 63 mini-LEDs (Glyph-style notification lighting) | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 6 | WiFi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅120Hz AMOLED 📱 | ✅ 7000mAh Large Battery 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌No IP68 Rating 💧 | ❌ Dimensity 7300 Performance ⚙️ |
| Best For | 🎯Everyday Users 📲 | 🎯 Long Battery Users 🔋 |
| Not Best For | 🚫Rugged Use 🏔️ | 🚫 Hardcore Gamers 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix GT 50 Pro | |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works