oppo Reno 14 Pro vs Oppo Reno 16
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the oppo Reno 14 Pro
- 6.7x better Digital Zoom (120 x vs 18 x)
- 38% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2 M vs 1.45 M)
- 16% higher Max Clock (3.25 GHz vs 2.8 GHz)
- 8% bigger Screen Size (6.83 inch vs 6.32 inch)
- Better Processor: Dimensity 8450 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
- Camera Sensor: 50 MP = Omni Vision OV50E 50 MP = Sam…
- Front Sensor: 50 MP = Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
- Special Features: IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance 8…
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16
- 50% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1200 nits)
- 8% larger Battery (6700 mAh vs 6200 mAh)
- 6% lighter Weight (188 g vs 201 g)
- Peak Brightness: 3600
- IP Rating: IP68/IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | oppo Reno 14 Pro | Oppo Reno 16 |
| Brand | OPPO | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 180000 PKR | 200000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹55000 | ₹68000 |
| Price USA | $580 | $700 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 163.4 x 77 x 7.5 mm | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm or 8.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.83 inch | 6.32 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1272 x 2800 Pixels | 1216 x 2640 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | - | 3600 |
| HBM Brightness | 1200 nits | 1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8450 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x Cortex-A725 @ 3.25 GHz | 1 x 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2 M | 1.45 M |
| Bootup Time | 18 s | 21 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 512 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256 GB 16 +512 GB | 8/12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 50 MP | 50 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Omni Vision OV50E | — |
| Zoom | 3.5 x | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 120 x | 18 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | Yes | Multi-focus LED flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP = Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 | — |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 6700 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | Not confirm | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 9h 29 Mints | 23h 48m - 91 Mobiles |
| Charging Time | 45-50 m (0% To 100%) | 1h 2m - 91 Mobiles |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | CPH2739 | CPH2865 |
| Release Date | 23 May, 2025 | 9 July, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Oppo Reno Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 Now | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 188 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back | aluminum frame, glass back |
| IP Rating | — | IP68/IP69K |
| Special Features | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 6 / 6E | WiFi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 50MP triple camera 📸 (OIS) | ✅ 120Hz AMOLED Display 📱 |
| Cons | ❌ No microSD slot 🗂️ | ❌ No Wireless Charging 🔋 |
| Best For | 🎯 Mobile photography 📷 | 🎯 Portrait Photography 📸 |
| Not Best For | 🚫 Expandable storage users 🗂️ | 🚫 Wireless Charging Fans 🔋 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | infinix GT 50 Pro | |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works