Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- 5.6x better Digital Zoom (100 x vs 18 x)
- 56% higher Charging Watts (125 W vs 80 W)
- 33% more RAM Memory (16+1TB vs 12 + 256 GB)
- 28% higher Camera (64+50+50 MP vs 50 + 50 + 50 MP)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 7% higher Max Clock (3.0 GHz vs 2.8 GHz)
- 6% bigger Screen Size (6.7 inch vs 6.32 inch)
- Better Screen Type: P-OLED vs Amoled
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
- Camera Sensor: 50 MP = OmniVision OV50H (Main) 50 MP…
- Front Sensor: 50 MP =Samsung S5KJN1
- Special Features: UWB support Smart Connect (Ready For)…
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16
- 49% larger Battery (6700 mAh vs 4500 mAH)
- 44% higher Peak Brightness (3600 vs 2500 nits)
- 20% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1500 nits)
- 17% higher Zoom (3.5 x vs 3 x)
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Model Number: CPH2865
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | Oppo Reno 16 |
| Brand | Motorola | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 170000 PKR | 200000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹55000 | ₹68000 |
| Price USA | $500 | $700 |
| Variants Prices | 16 + 512 GB = Unknown | 50,000 INR | Not Confirm | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm or 8.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inch | 6.32 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1220 x 2712 Pixels | 1216 x 2640 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | P-OLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 2500 nits | 3600 |
| HBM Brightness | 1500 nits | 1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.0 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.0GHz | 1 x 2.8 GHz Cortex-720 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC8 | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.5 M | 1.45 M |
| Bootup Time | 22s | 21 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16+1TB | 12 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 16 + 512 GB | 8/12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 64+50+50 MP | 50 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = OmniVision OV50H (Main) | — |
| Zoom | 3 x | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 100 x | 18 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Multi-focus LED flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP =Samsung S5KJN1 | — |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 60 | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 4500 mAH | 6700 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 125 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | - | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | 10 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12h 40m | 23h 48m - 91 Mobiles |
| Charging Time | 25 minutes (0% to 100%) | 1h 2m - 91 Mobiles |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | - | CPH2865 |
| Release Date | 15 May, 2024 | 9 July, 2026 |
| Year | 2024 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Edge Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Mid-Premium Smartphone | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 14, up to 3 major OS updates | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 188 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Back Lather | aluminum frame, glass back |
| IP Rating | ip 68 | IP68/IP69K |
| Special Features | UWB support | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) | WiFi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4v | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz Display | ✅ 120Hz AMOLED Display 📱 |
| Cons | ❌ No 8K Video | ❌ No Wireless Charging 🔋 |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Portrait Photography 📸 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | 🚫 Wireless Charging Fans 🔋 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Xiaomi 14T | |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works