Infinix GT 50 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
- + 33% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs 1200 nits)
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 5% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.1 M vs 2 M)
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
Reasons to consider the oppo Reno 14 Pro
- + 12.0x better Digital Zoom (120 x vs 10 X)
- + 3.8x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 78% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 45 W)
- + 5% higher Screen Resolution (1272 x 2800 Pixels vs 1208 x 2644 Pixels)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8400
- + Zoom: 3.5 x
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Mid Range
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix GT 50 Pro | oppo Reno 14 Pro |
| Brand | infinix | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 160000 PKR | 180000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹35000 | ₹55000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $580 |
| Variants Prices | 12+ 256GB = 152,000 PKR | 370 $ | 34,000 INR | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm | 163.4 x 77 x 7.5 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1272 x 2800 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | - | - |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 1200 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 | Dimensity 8450 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.25 GHz | 1 x Cortex-A725 @ 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 (7-core) | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.1 M | 2 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 18 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256GB | 12 + 256 GB 16 +512 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony IMX896 (OIS) | 50 MP = Omni Vision OV50E |
| Zoom | - | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | 120 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 | 50 MP = Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 |
| Front Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 6200 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | 50 W |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | Not confirm |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 9h 29 Mints |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 45-50 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6891 | CPH2739 |
| Release Date | 25 April, 2026 | 23 May, 2025 |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Series Name | GT Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | - | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 198 grams | 201 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | WiFi 6 / 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Dimensity 8400 | ✅ 50MP triple camera 📸 (OIS) |
| Cons | ❌No optical zoom | ❌ No microSD slot 🗂️ |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy gamers | 🎯 Mobile photography 📷 |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography fans | 🚫 Expandable storage users 🗂️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Realme GT 7T | infinix GT 50 Pro |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- oppo Reno 14 Pro vs Oppo Reno 13 Pro
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Motorola Edge 70 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











