Vivo x300 FE vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Vivo x300 FE
- 45% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.9 M vs 2 M)
- 39% higher Peak Brightness (5000 nits vs 3600 nits)
- 25% smaller Lithography Process (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- 18% higher Screen Resolution (1440 x 3168 Pixels vs 1216 x 2640 Pixels)
- 17% higher Max Clock (3.8 GHz vs 3.25 GHz)
- 13% higher Charging Watts (90 W vs 80 W)
- Better Screen Type: LTPO Amoled vs Amoled
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Dimensity 8450
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
- Includes Reverse Wireless
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- 4.0x better Camera (200 + 50 + 50 MP vs 50 + 50 + 8 MP)
- 17% higher Zoom (3.5 x vs 3.0 x)
- Digital Zoom: 18 x
- Flash: Yes
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Vivo x300 FE | Oppo Reno 15 Pro |
| Brand | Vivo | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 240000 PKR | 226000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹85000 | ₹73000 |
| Price USA | $850 | $780 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 150.8 × 71.8 × 8 mm | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.31 inch | 6.32 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1440 x 3168 Pixels | 1216 x 2640 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 5000 nits | 3600 nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~1800 nits | ~1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 8450 |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2 × 3.8 GHz | 1 x 3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 |
| GPU | Adreno 829 | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.9 M | 2 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 19 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+512 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X (5300 MHz) | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 8 MP | 200 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 16320 × 12240 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP= Sony IMX882 | – |
| Zoom | 3.0 x | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | - | 18 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60/120fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | - | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Samsung S5KJN1 | – |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@60fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | No | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 40 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | Yes | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 10h 30m |
| Charging Time | - | 60-70 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | V2537 | CPH2813 |
| Release Date | 29 April, 2026 | 2 January, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Vivo X Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17, OriginOS 7 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 187 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | ZEISS Telephoto Extender Gen 2: Supports an optional magnetic 200mm optical expansion lens kit. Origin Island UI: Features Drag & Go and Copy & Go semantic AI quick actions. Ecosystem Integration: Includes specialized AirPods status UI, cross-platform task handoff, and Remote PC control. Flash Portrait Night Engine: Maps adaptive flash across 5 focal profiles (23mm to 100mm). |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 7 (802.11be) | WiFi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Compact Flagship (6.31″ LTPO AMOLED) | ✅ 200MP main camera 📸 |
| Cons | ❌ No SD Card (No microSD Slot) | ❌ No headphone jack 🎧 |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Mobile photographers 📷 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | 🚫 Heavy gamers 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra | Poco F7 Ultra |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works