OPPO Reno 15 Pro Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)

Q: What is the price of OPPO Reno 15 Pro in the USA, India, and Pakistan?

12 + 256 GB | ~₹63,000 | ~$720 | 223,000 PKR 12 + 512 GB| ~₹73,000 | ~$ 790 | ~210,000 PKR

✪ Oppo Reno 15 Pro ✪

Last Time Update : 21 October, 2026

United States

750USD

…i

Pakistan (PKR)

232000PKR

India (INR)

73000INR

Compare Mobiles

Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ Oppo Reno 15 Pro ✪

Quick Specs

Display: 6.32 inchAmoled120 Hz
Processor: Dimensity 84503.25 GHz
RAM & Storage: 12 + 512 GB
Rear Camera: 200 + 50 + 50 MP
Front Camera: 50 MP
Battery & Charging: 6200 mAh80 W

Full Specification

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

Basic Info

Mobile: Oppo Reno 15 Pro
Model: CPH2813
Series: Oppo Reno Series
Category: Flagship
Release Date: 2 January,2026
Year: 2026

Connectivity

SIM: Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network: 4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi: WiFi 7
Bluetooth: 5.4
NFC: Yes
OS: Android 17 Now

Body

Dimensions: 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm
Build: Frame Aluminum And Glass Back
Weight: 187 g

Screen Size: 6.32 inch
Resolution: 1216 x 2640 Pixels
Type: Amoled
Refresh Rate: 120 Hz
Peak Brightness: 3600 nits
HBM Brightness: ~1800 nits

Processor Specs

Processor

Dimensity 8450

Max Clock

3.25 GHz

Lithography

4 nm

GPU

Mali-G720 MC7

CPU Cores

8 Cores

Antutu v11

2 M

Antutu v10

Bootup Time

19 s

Architecture

1 x 3.25 GHz Cortex-A725
3 x 3.0 GHz Cortex-A725
4 x 2.1 GHz Cortex-A725

RAM & ROM Specs

RAM Memory

12 + 512 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X

Storage Type

UFS 3.1

SD Card

Variants

12 + 256 GB
12 + 512 GB

Camera Specs

Rear Camera

200 + 50 + 50 MP

Front Camera

50 MP

Sensors

Camera Sensors

–

Front Sensors

–

Recording FPS

Main Recording

4K @ 30/60 fps
1080p @ 30/60/120/480 fps

Front Recording

4K @ 30/60 fps
1080p @ 30/60 fps

Zoom

Optical Zoom

3.5 x

Digital Zoom

18 x

Flash

Yes

Front Flash

Screen Flash

Battery Specs

Capacity

6200 mAh

Fast Charging

80 W

Wireless Charging

Battery Type

Silicon-Carbon

Reverse

Reverse Wired

Yes

Reverse Wireless

Other

Battery PC Marks

10h 30m

Charging Time

60-70 m (0% To 100%)

Other Specs

Audio & Sensors

Speaker

Dual Stereo Speaker

Fingerprint Sensor

Hyper Sonic Front Finger

Other Sensors

Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Proximity
Compass
Hall sensor
RGB/color spectrum sensor

Special Features

Color spectrum sensor (main camera)
Vapor chamber cooling system
Reverse wired charging
IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance
TÜV Rheinland Flicker-Free & Eye Comfort certification, TÜV Low Blue Light
SGS-certified display
DC Dimming
960fps slow-motion video

BASIC INFO

Mobile

Oppo Reno 15 Pro

Model

CPH2813

Series

Oppo Reno Series

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Official Manufacturer WebsiteExplore the original product information (opens in a new tab)

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 6 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 21 October, 2026

Highlights & Review Of Oppo Reno 15 Pro

Display Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro‘s 6.78-inch AMOLED display uses a sharp 1272 x 2772 pixel resolution with a 120Hz refresh rate, backed by 3600 nits peak brightness, and it’s priced at PKR 226,000 in the 12+512GB configuration.

The Xiaomi 17T (PKR 216,000) comes close on paper with its 6.59-inch AMOLED, 1268 x 2756 pixels, and 120Hz refresh rate, but tops out at 3500 nits peak, meaning the two look nearly identical on a spec sheet despite the Oppo Reno 15 Pro costing PKR 10,000 more.

The Vivo X300 FE (PKR 244,000) is a different story, its 6.31-inch LTPO AMOLED panel drops to a smaller screen size but pushes 5000 nits peak brightness with a full 1Hz to 120Hz adaptive refresh range, giving it noticeably better outdoor visibility and idle power efficiency than the Reno 15 Pro’s fixed 120Hz panel.

The Poco F7 Ultra (PKR 250,000) flips the comparison again with its 6.67-inch AMOLED at a sharper 1440 x 3200 pixel WQHD+ resolution, the highest pixel density of the group, though its 3200 nits peak brightness actually trails the Oppo Reno 15 Pro’s 3600 nits, meaning the sharper screen doesn’t necessarily read brighter under direct sun.

Verdict: The OPPO Reno 15 Pro holds its own against the Xiaomi 17T on brightness and resolution but loses ground to the Vivo X300 FE’s superior LTPO adaptive display, and buyers chasing maximum sharpness should look at the Poco F7 Ultra’s QHD+ panel instead.

Performance Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8450 octa-core chipset paired with a Mali-G720 MC7 GPU, scoring 2,050,891 on AnTuTu v11, at PKR 226,000.

The Xiaomi 17T (PKR 216,000) uses the newer Dimensity 8500 Ultra with a Mali-G720 MC8 GPU, posting 2,407,614 on AnTuTu v11, roughly 17% higher than the Reno 15 Pro despite costing PKR 10,000 less, meaning the 17T pulls ahead on both multitasking headroom and price.

The Vivo X300 FE (PKR 244,000) jumps into a different performance class entirely with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 and Adreno 829 GPU, hitting 3,080,247 on AnTuTu v11, about 50% higher than the Oppo Reno 15 Pro, which reflects the real gap between the Oppo Reno 15 Pro’s upper-midrange Dimensity chip and a true current-gen flagship platform.

The Poco F7 Ultra (PKR 250,000) runs the Snapdragon 8 Elite and scored 2,843,461, though that figure is on AnTuTu v10 rather than v11, so it isn’t a perfectly apples-to-apples number against the other three; even so, the Snapdragon 8 Elite is a known flagship-tier chip and typically outperforms the Dimensity 8450 by a wide margin in sustained gaming loads.

Verdict: The Oppo Reno 15 Pro’s Dimensity 8450 is adequate for everyday use but is outclassed on raw performance by all three rivals, including the cheaper Xiaomi 17T, so buyers prioritizing gaming or heavy multitasking will get noticeably more chip for similar or less money with the Xiaomi 17T or Vivo X300 FE.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro pairs 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM with 512GB of UFS 3.1 storage in this configuration, priced at PKR 226,000, and has no microSD slot.

The Xiaomi 17T (PKR 216,000) matches the 12GB LPDDR5X RAM but jumps to UFS 4.1 storage at the same 512GB capacity, meaning app installs, large file transfers, and 4K video exports will be noticeably faster on the 17T despite it costing PKR 10,000 less, since UFS 4.1 offers roughly double the sequential read/write speeds of UFS 3.1.

The Vivo X300 FE (PKR 244,000) also runs 12GB LPDDR5X RAM with UFS 4.1 storage, but drops to 256GB in this configuration, half the Reno 15 Pro’s storage despite costing PKR 18,000 more, so buyers who shoot a lot of 200MP photos or 4K footage will fill it up faster.

The Poco F7 Ultra (PKR 250,000) leads on raw memory with 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 512GB of UFS 4.1 storage, giving it both more headroom for background apps and the faster storage standard, though it’s also the most expensive phone in this group. None of the four phones support microSD expansion, so the onboard storage figure is final in every case.

Verdict: The Reno 15 Pro’s UFS 3.1 storage is the clear weak point here, since even the cheaper Xiaomi 17T outpaces it on real-world read and write speeds, and buyers wanting the most RAM and fastest storage together should lean toward the Poco F7 Ultra instead.

Camera Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro‘s 200MP main camera runs f/1.8 with OIS, though the exact sensor model isn’t officially disclosed on Oppo’s own spec sheet, paired with a 50MP f/2.8 OIS telephoto (3.5x) and a 50MP f/2.0 autofocus ultrawide, plus a 50MP f/2.0 front camera; rear video tops out at 4K@60fps, but Oppo doesn’t specify a front camera video resolution.

The Xiaomi 17T (PKR 216,000) uses a confirmed 50MP OmniVision Light Fusion 800 sensor at f/1.7 with OIS, and its standout is a genuine 50MP f/3.0 periscope telephoto delivering 5x optical zoom, well beyond the Reno 15 Pro’s 3.5x, though its 13MP ultrawide and 32MP front camera are both fixed-focus and capped at 4K30.

The Vivo X300 FE (PKR 244,000) pairs a 50MP Sony IMX921 main sensor at f/1.6 with OIS and a 50MP Sony IMX882 3x telephoto, both verifiable hardware, but its 8MP ultrawide is the weakest of the four, with no autofocus and video capped at 1080p; its 50MP autofocus front camera shoots up to 4K60, the best selfie video spec here.

The Poco F7 Ultra (PKR 250,000) has a confirmed 50MP OmniVision Light Fusion 800 main sensor at f/1.6, but GSMArena’s testing found no OIS listed on that main lens, only PDAF; its 50MP f/2.0 telephoto does carry OIS at 2.5x zoom, while the 32MP ultrawide and 32MP front camera are both fixed-focus and limited to 1080p60, the lowest front video ceiling in this group.

Verdict: The Xiaomi 17T’s 5x optical telephoto gives it the strongest zoom hardware for the price, while the Reno 15 Pro’s undisclosed main sensor and unspecified front video spec make it the least transparent of the four on paper.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro packs a 6500mAh battery with 80W wired SuperVOOC and 50W wireless AIRVOOC charging, though Oppo hasn’t published an official 0-100% charge time for this specific 6.78-inch variant.

The Xiaomi 17T (PKR 216,000) matches the same 6500mAh capacity but charges slower at 67W wired with no wireless option, taking a confirmed 60 minutes for a full charge in GSMArena’s lab tests, and it does add 22.5W reverse wired charging which the Reno 15 Pro doesn’t list.

The Vivo X300 FE (PKR 244,000) also runs a 6500mAh cell, but its 90W wired and 40W wireless charging combination gets it to full in just 55 minutes, faster than both the Reno 15 Pro and the Xiaomi 17T despite carrying the same battery size, and it adds both reverse wired and reverse wireless charging.

The Poco F7 Ultra (PKR 250,000) trades battery capacity for raw charging speed, its smaller 5300mAh battery paired with 120W wired and 50W wireless charging hits full charge in just 30 minutes, nearly twice as fast as the Vivo X300 FE and by far the quickest in this group, meaning it sacrifices roughly 1200mAh of capacity for a dramatically shorter time tethered to a charger.

Verdict: The Reno 15 Pro’s 80W charging is the slowest confirmed spec on paper against the Xiaomi 17T’s tested 60-minute full charge, and buyers who prioritize charging speed over raw capacity should look at the Poco F7 Ultra, while those who want the biggest battery with fast wired and wireless charging together are better served by the Vivo X300 FE.

Final Verdict

Across all five categories, no single phone dominates, but the Vivo X300 FE comes out ahead most consistently. Its LTPO AMOLED display and Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 chipset outperform the other three, and its 50MP Sony main and telephoto cameras are the most verifiably capable hardware in this group, backed by a 6500mAh battery that charges faster than both the Reno 15 Pro and the Xiaomi 17T. Its weak points are real, though: an 8MP ultrawide with no autofocus, only 256GB storage despite the highest price among the rivals at PKR 244,000, and no clear RAM/storage advantage over the cheaper Xiaomi 17T.

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro trails in this comparison, losing to the Xiaomi 17T on chipset, storage speed, and price, and to the Vivo X300 FE on display and camera hardware, without a standout advantage of its own to offset the PKR 226,000 asking price.

Bottom line: If money is no object, the Vivo X300 FE is the strongest all-rounder here, but the Xiaomi 17T is the smarter buy for most people since it undercuts the Oppo Reno 15 Pro on price while beating it almost everywhere.