Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 7% bigger Screen Size (6.78 inch vs 6.32 inch)
- + 5% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.1 M vs 2 M)
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- + 4.0x better Camera (200 + 50 + 50 MP vs 50 + 8 MP)
- + 3.8x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 80% higher Digital Zoom (18 x vs 10 X)
- + 78% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 45 W)
- + 13% higher HBM Brightness (~1800 nits vs 1600 nits)
- + 6% lighter Weight (187 g vs 198 grams)
- + Peak Brightness: 3600 nits
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8400
- + Zoom: 3.5 x
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Flagship
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Oppo Reno 15 Pro |
| Brand | infinix | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 160000 PKR | 226000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹35000 | ₹73000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $780 |
| Variants Prices | 12+ 256GB = 152,000 PKR | 370 $ | 34,000 INR | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.32 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1216 x 2640 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | - | 3600 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | ~1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 | Dimensity 8450 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.25 GHz | 1 x 3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 (7-core) | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.1 M | 2 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 19 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 8 MP | 200 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 16320 × 12240 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony IMX896 (OIS) | – |
| Zoom | - | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | 18 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 | – |
| Front Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 6200 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 10h 30m |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 60-70 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6891 | CPH2813 |
| Release Date | 25 April, 2026 | 2 January, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | GT Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | - | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 198 grams | 187 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | WiFi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Dimensity 8400 | ✅ 200MP main camera 📸 |
| Cons | ❌No optical zoom | ❌ No headphone jack 🎧 |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy gamers | 🎯 Mobile photographers 📷 |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography fans | 🚫 Heavy gamers 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Realme GT 7T | Poco F7 Ultra |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Vivo X200 FE vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Oppo Reno 16
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











