Vivo x300 FE vs Vivo X200 FE
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Vivo x300 FE
- 26% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.9 M vs 2.3 M)
- 25% smaller Lithography Process (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- 18% higher Screen Resolution (1440 x 3168 Pixels vs 1216 × 2640 Pixels)
- 12% higher Max Clock (3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz)
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Dimensity 9300+
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- Digital Zoom: 100 x
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Vivo x300 FE | Vivo X200 FE |
| Brand | Vivo | Vivo |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 240000 PKR | 195000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹85000 | ₹55000 |
| Price USA | $850 | $560 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB 16 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 150.8 × 71.8 × 8 mm | 150.8 × 71.8 × 8.0 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.31 inch | 6.31 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1440 x 3168 Pixels | 1216 × 2640 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO Amoled | LTPO Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 5000 nits | 5000 nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~1800 nits | ~1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9300+ |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2 × 3.8 GHz | 1 × 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 |
| GPU | Adreno 829 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.9 M | 2.3 M |
| Bootup Time | - | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+512 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X (5300 MHz) | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP= Sony IMX882 | 50 MP= Sony IMX882 |
| Zoom | 3.0 x | 3 x |
| Digital Zoom | - | 100 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60/120fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | - | - |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Samsung S5KJN1 | 50 MP=Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@60fps | 4K @ 60 fps |
| Front Flash | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 40 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | - |
| Charging Time | - | 50-60 mints ( 0-100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | V2537 | V2503 |
| Release Date | 29 April, 2026 | 5 July, 2025 |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Vivo X Series | Vivo X Series |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17, OriginOS 7 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 186 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | ZEISS Telephoto Extender Gen 2: Supports an optional magnetic 200mm optical expansion lens kit. Origin Island UI: Features Drag & Go and Copy & Go semantic AI quick actions. Ecosystem Integration: Includes specialized AirPods status UI, cross-platform task handoff, and Remote PC control. Flash Portrait Night Engine: Maps adaptive flash across 5 focal profiles (23mm to 100mm). | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 7 (802.11be) | WiFi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Compact Flagship (6.31″ LTPO AMOLED) | ✅ Compact flagship body 📱 150.8×71.8×8mm, 186g |
| Cons | ❌ No SD Card (No microSD Slot) | ❌ No expandable storage 🗂️ no microSD card slot |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Compact phone lovers 🤏 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | 🚫 MicroSD storage needs 🗂️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works