Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- + 3.8x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12+256 GB vs 8 + 128 GB)
- + 37% higher HBM Brightness (1300 Nits vs 950 Nits)
- + 33% smaller Lithography Process (4 nm vs 6 nm)
- + 21% lighter Weight (178 g vs 225 g)
- + 15% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (900 K vs 780 K)
- + 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2344 Pixels)
- + 8% higher Max Clock (2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz)
- + Better Screen Type: Amoled vs IPS LCD
- + Peak Brightness: 2400 Nits
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 7400 vs Dimensity 7100
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- + Zoom: 3 x
- + Higher Video Recording: 4K@ 30 fps 1080p@ 60 fps vs 2K@ 30 fps 1080p@ 60 fps
- + Front Sensor: 50 MP=Unknown
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 8
- + 23% larger Battery (8000 mAh vs 6500 mAh)
- + Includes Card Slot
- + Model Number: LK6
- + IP Rating: ip 64
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 |
| Brand | Tecno | Tecno |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 120000 PKR | 85000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹40000 | ₹28000 |
| Price USA | $420 | $280 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed | 8 + 256GB = ?$ |32,000 INR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm | 165.7 x 78.5 x 8.8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.76 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2344 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | IPS LCD |
| Peak Brightness | 2400 Nits | — |
| HBM Brightness | 1300 Nits | 950 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Dimensity 7100 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 4 × 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 900 K | 780 K |
| Bootup Time | - | 30 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 8 + 128 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | No | Yes |
| Variants | 8 + 256GB | 6 / 8 + 128 GB 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+50+8 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8,165 × 6,124 Pixel |
| Camera Sensor | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown | 50 MP = Sony LYT-600 |
| Zoom | 3 x | — |
| Digital Zoom | - | — |
| Video Recording | 4K@ 30 fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Unknown | — |
| Front Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 4,163 × 3,122 Pixel |
| Front Recording | 4K@ 60 fps | 2K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | 10 W |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 11h 23m | 17h 34m - 91 Mobiles |
| Charging Time | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) | 1h 11m - 91 Mobiles |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | LK6 |
| Release Date | 2 March, 2026 | 1 July, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | Pova Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 225 g |
| Build | glass back , plastic frame | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) |
| IP Rating | — | ip 64 |
| Special Features | – | Round matrix display (on the back) Camera Module |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) | 8,000mAh Battery 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) | IPS LCD Panel 📱 |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | Long Battery Life 🔋 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | AMOLED Lovers 🖥️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Unboxing | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V70 FE
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Realme 15 Pro
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V60
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Pova 7 4G vs Tecno Pova 8
- Tecno Pova 7 5G vs Tecno Pova 8
- Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8
- Infinix Note Edge vs Tecno Pova 8
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15F
- Oppo Reno 14F vs Tecno Pova 8
- Oppo A7 Pro Max vs Tecno Pova 8
- Tecno Pova 8 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











