Flyout Menu
Menu

FSL Specs

Flyout Menu
Menu
Flyout Menu

FSL Specs

✪ Tecno Pova 8 ✪

tecno pova 8
United States flag United States
$280 USD
…
Pakistan flag Pakistan (PKR)
85,000 PKR
India flag India (INR)
₹28,000 INR
Compare Mobiles
Tools
Processors
Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ Tecno Pova 8 ✪

tecno pova 8
Last Time Update : 22 September, 2026
0
Tecno Pova 8
Tecno Pova 8-1
Tecno Pova 8-2
Tecno Pova 8-3

Quick Specifications

IPS LCD

Display Type

Dimensity 7100

Processor

8 + 128 GB

Ram And Memory

50 MP

Camera

8000 mAh

Battery

45 W

Fast Charging

Full Specification

BASIC INFO
Mobile
Tecno Pova 8
Model
LK6
Series
Pova Series
Category
Mid-Range
Release Date
1 July,2026
Year
2026
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Dual Nano-SIM
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 16
BODY
Dimensions
165.7 x 78.5 x 8.8 mm
Build
Plastic ( Back And Frame )
KG Weight
225 g
Screen Size
6.76 inch
Resolution
1080 x 2344 Pixels
Type
IPS LCD
Refresh Rate
144 Hz
HBM Brightness
950 Nits
Processor
Dimensity 7100
Max Clock
2.4 GHz
Lithography
6 nm
GPU
Mali-G610 MC2
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
780 K
Bootup Time
30 s
Architecture
4 × 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4 × 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Ram Memory
8 + 128 GB
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 2.2
SD Card
Yes
Variants
6 / 8 + 128 GB
8 + 256 GB
MP
Rear Camera
50 MP
Front Camera
13 MP
SENSORS
Camera Sensors
50 MP = Sony LYT-600
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2K@ 30 fps
1080p@ 60 fps
Front Recording
2K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 60 fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
8,165 × 6,124 Pixel
Front Resolution
4,163 × 3,122 Pixel
Stabilization
Digital
FLASH
Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Capacity
8000 mAh
Fast Charging
45 W
Wireless Charging
No
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
10 W
Reverse Wireless
No
OTHER
Battery PC Marks
17h 34m - 91 Mobiles
Charging Time
1h 11m - 91 Mobiles
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger
Other Sensors
✅ Accelerometer
✅ Proximity Sensor
✅ Compass
✅ Gyroscope
✅Ambient Light.etc
Special Features

Round matrix display (on the back) Camera Module

BASIC INFO
Mobile
Tecno Pova 8
Model
LK6
Series
Pova Series
Category
Mid-Range
Release Date
1 July,2026
Year
2026
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Dual Nano-SIM
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 16
BODY
Dimensions
165.7 x 78.5 x 8.8 mm
Build
Plastic ( Back And Frame )
KG Weight
225 g
Screen Size
6.76 inch
Resolution
1080 x 2344 Pixels
Type
IPS LCD
Refresh Rate
144 Hz
HBM Brightness
950 Nits
Processor
Dimensity 7100
Max Clock
2.4 GHz
Lithography
6 nm
GPU
Mali-G610 MC2
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
780 K
Bootup Time
30 s
Architecture
4 × 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4 × 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Ram Memory
8 + 128 GB
SD Card
Yes
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 2.2
Variants
6 / 8 + 128 GB
8 + 256 GB
MP
Rear Camera
50 MP
Front Camera
13 MP
SENSORS
Main Camera Sensors
50 MP = Sony LYT-600
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2K@ 30 fps
1080p@ 60 fps
Front Recording
2K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 60 fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
8,165 × 6,124 Pixel
Front Resolution
4,163 × 3,122 Pixel
Stabilization
Digital
FLASH
Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Capacity
8000 mAh
Fast Charging
45 W
Wireless Charging
No
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
10 W
Reverse Wireless
No
OTHER
Battery Life PCMark
17h 34m - 91 Mobiles
Charging Time
1h 11m - 91 Mobiles
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger
Other Sensors
✅ Accelerometer
✅ Proximity Sensor
✅ Compass
✅ Gyroscope
✅Ambient Light.etc
Special Features

Round matrix display (on the back) Camera Module

Highlights & Review Of Tecno Pova 8

Display Review:

The Tecno Pova 8 uses a 6.76-inch IPS LCD display at 1080 x 2344 pixels, supporting up to 144Hz, with Tecno’s official spec sheet listing 760 nits typical / 950 nits HBM brightness. Sources differ here though: GSMArena’s lab tests measured only around 650 nits manually and just under 1000 nits with auto brightness and HBM combined, noticeably below Tecno’s own claims. At PKR 115,000-120,000, the LCD panel is already the clearest weak point against three AMOLED rivals.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 117,000) uses a 6.78-inch curved AMOLED at 1208 x 2644 pixels (1.5K), matching the Tecno Pova 8’s 144Hz ceiling. Tecno markets this panel at up to 4500 nits peak, but GSMArena’s lab measurements came in far lower at 1302 nits HBM and 1667 nits peak on a 10% patch, an unresolved gap between marketing and tested performance. Even at the lower measured figures, it still comfortably beats the Tecno Pova 8’s LCD on contrast and color.

The Vivo V70 FE (PKR 121,000) offers the largest and sharpest screen here, a 6.83-inch AMOLED at 1260 x 2800 pixels (1.5K), though it caps out at 120Hz versus the 144Hz on the other three phones. Its 1900 nits HBM rating is the highest official figure in this group, giving it strong outdoor visibility despite the lower refresh rate.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 118,000) matches the Camon 50 Ultra’s 6.78-inch AMOLED, 1208 x 2644 resolution, and 144Hz refresh rate, with a brightness rating of 1600 nits HBM and 4500 nits peak.

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 8’s IPS LCD panel is the clear loser here against three AMOLED rivals, and buyers who care about display quality should look at the Infinix Note 60 Pro or Vivo V70 FE instead, both of which pair strong brightness with sharper, richer AMOLED screens for similar money.

Processor Review:

The Tecno Pova 8 runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7100, a 6nm octa-core chip (4×2.4GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×2.0GHz Cortex-A55) paired with a Mali-G610 MC2 GPU. Sources differ on its AnTuTu 11 score: NanoReview’s average puts it at 757,391, while Kimovil lists 787,596, a gap likely down to differing test units. At PKR 115,000-120,000, this is the weakest chipset of the four phones here.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 117,000) steps up to the Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, a 4nm chip with the same core layout but higher clocks (4×2.6GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×2.0GHz Cortex-A55) and a Mali-G615 GPU, scoring 1,030,590 on AnTuTu 11, roughly 36% higher than the Tecno Pova 8. That translates to noticeably better multitasking and sustained gaming performance for similar money.

The Vivo V70 FE (PKR 121,000) uses the Dimensity 7360-Turbo, another 4nm chip (4×2.5GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×2.0GHz Cortex-A55) with a Mali-G615 MC2 GPU, scoring around 1,183,301 on AnTuTu 11, about 56% higher than the Tecno Pova 8 and the strongest performer in this group.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 118,000) is Infinix’s first Note-series phone to use a Qualcomm chip, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 with an Adreno 810 GPU. Here the sources conflict too: fsl-specs.com’s own testing puts it at over 1,064,000 on AnTuTu 11, while Infinix’s official marketing claims 1,100,000, roughly 40-45% higher than the Tecn Pova 8 either way.

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 8’s Dimensity 7100 trails every rival here by 36% or more on AnTuTu, and the Vivo V70 FE is the clear performance leader of the group, making it the strongest pick for buyers who prioritize raw speed over the Tecno Pova 8’s bigger battery and lower price.

Ram & Memory Review:

The Tecno Pova 8 ships with 8GB RAM and 256GB UFS 2.2 storage; the RAM type hasn’t been officially disclosed by Tecno. It does support a microSDXC card slot, but GSMArena notes this is only confirmed on the India model and uses a shared SIM slot, so buyers in Pakistan should verify this feature before relying on it. At PKR 115,000-120,000, this is the only phone in the group with any expansion option, even if it’s not guaranteed in every market.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 117,000) uses 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM, a faster standard than the Pova 8’s unconfirmed memory, paired with 256GB UFS storage, but has no card slot at all. The extra RAM and newer LPDDR5X standard should mean noticeably smoother app switching and better background app retention than the Pova 8.

The Vivo V70 FE (PKR 121,000) pairs 8GB of dual-channel LPDDR5 RAM with 256GB UFS 3.1 storage, the fastest storage standard of the four phones here, meaning quicker app installs and file transfers, though like the Camon 50 Ultra it drops microSD support entirely.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 118,000) matches the Pova 8’s 8GB RAM capacity but uses the newer LPDDR5X standard, paired with 256GB UFS 2.2 storage, the same storage generation as the Pova 8, and also has no card slot.

Verdict: The Tecn Pova 8 is the only phone here with expandable storage, though only conditionally in some markets, while the Camon 50 Ultra and Vivo V70 FE offer meaningfully faster memory and storage standards, making them the stronger picks for buyers who prioritize raw speed over expansion.

Cameras Review:

The Tecno Pova 8 relies on a single functional 50MP main camera at f/1.8 with a 1/1.95″ sensor and no OIS. Sources differ on the exact sensor: GSMArena’s teardown lists it as either a Sony LYTIA 600 or a GalaxyCore GC50D1, and the phone’s second rear sensor exists in hardware but isn’t accessible through the camera app, so there’s effectively no ultrawide lens. Video tops out at 1440p@30fps or 1080p@60fps, with no 4K option at all. The 13MP selfie camera is fixed-focus. At PKR 115,000-120,000, this is clearly the weakest camera setup of the four.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 117,000) uses a confirmed 50MP Sony LYT700C main sensor at f/1.8 with OIS, a 50MP telephoto at f/2.4 with 3x optical zoom, and an 8MP ultrawide. Rear video hits 4K@30fps, and the 50MP selfie camera records up to 4K@60fps, both far ahead of the Pova 8.

The Vivo V70 FE (PKR 121,000) leads on resolution with a 200MP main sensor at f/1.9 with OIS, paired with an 8MP ultrawide, though it drops the telephoto lens found on the standard V70. Rear video reaches 4K, and the 32MP selfie camera also shoots 4K.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 118,000) uses a 50MP main sensor at f/1.6 with OIS and an 8MP ultrawide. Rear video reaches 4K@30fps with 1080p up to 120fps, and the 13MP selfie camera shoots up to 4K@30fps.

Verdict: The Pova 8’s missing ultrawide and capped 1080p video make it the clear camera loser here, while the Camon 50 Ultra’s confirmed triple-camera setup with telephoto and 4K@60fps front and rear makes it the strongest all-round camera pick in this group.

Battery Review:

The Tecno Pova 8 has the largest cell of the four at 8000mAh, but its 45W wired charging is the slowest here, reaching 50% in 35-39 minutes and a full charge in just shy of 90 minutes in GSMArena’s lab tests. It supports 10W reverse wired charging but drops the wireless charging its predecessor offered. At PKR 115,000-120,000, the sheer capacity is the selling point, at the cost of a long time on the charger.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 117,000) has a smaller 6500mAh battery but the same 45W wired charging as the Pova 8, reaching full in 80 minutes in lab testing, noticeably faster despite similar wattage since there’s less capacity to fill. It also supports reverse wired charging and bypass charging, but no wireless.

The Vivo V70 FE (PKR 121,000) steps up to 90W wired charging on its 7000mAh battery, reaching 100% in 60 minutes, faster than both Tecno phones despite carrying more capacity than the Camon 50 Ultra. It supports reverse wired and bypass charging, but no wireless charging.

The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 118,000) is the clear charging leader, pairing a 6500mAh battery with 90W wired charging that hits 100% in just 41 minutes, the fastest of the group by a wide margin. It’s also the only phone here with 30W wireless charging, plus 7.5W reverse wired and 5W reverse wireless charging.

Verdict: The Pova 8 wins on raw capacity but loses badly on charging speed, and the Infinix Note 60 Pro is the strongest all-round battery pick, charging more than twice as fast as the Pova 8 while also being the only phone here with wireless charging.

Final Verdict :

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is best for:

  • ✅ Photography-focused buyers who want a confirmed telephoto lens
  • ✅ Anyone who shoots a lot of video (4K@60fps front and rear)
  • ✅ Buyers who want a sharp AMOLED display at a competitive price
  • ✅ Users who value IP68/IP69K-level durability
  • ✅ Buyers who want the strongest all-round camera system at PKR 117,000

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is not best for:

  • ❌ Anyone needing expandable storage (no card slot)
  • ❌ Buyers who want the fastest possible charging (45W is mid-pack)
  • ❌ Gamers chasing the absolute top AnTuTu score in this group

Vivo V70 FE is best for:

  • ✅ Buyers who want the largest, sharpest display (6.83″, 200MP main camera)
  • ✅ Performance-focused users (strongest AnTuTu score here)
  • ✅ Anyone who wants the biggest non-Pova battery paired with fast 90W charging
  • ✅ Buyers less concerned about zoom versatility

Vivo V70 FE is not best for:

  • ❌ Zoom photography fans (no telephoto lens, unlike its own V70 sibling)
  • ❌ Buyers on a strict budget (most expensive phone in this comparison)
  • ❌ Anyone who wants 144Hz (capped at 120Hz)

Infinix Note 60 Pro is best for:

  • ✅ Buyers who want the fastest charging in this group (90W wired, 41 minutes to full)
  • ✅ Anyone who specifically wants wireless charging (the only phone here with it)
  • ✅ Buyers who want a balanced AMOLED display without paying Vivo’s premium
  • ✅ Users who want Qualcomm silicon over MediaTek

Infinix Note 60 Pro is not best for:

  • ❌ Anyone needing expandable storage (no card slot)
  • ❌ Camera enthusiasts wanting a telephoto lens
  • ❌ Buyers wanting maximum battery capacity (mid-pack at 6500mAh)

Final Verdict:

Across display, processor, RAM, camera, and battery, the Tecno Pova 8 (PKR 115,000-120,000) is the weakest phone in this comparison, held back by its IPS LCD panel, the slowest chipset by a wide margin, a missing ultrawide camera, and the slowest charging speed, its only real advantages being the biggest battery and a conditionally available microSD slot.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (PKR 117,000) is the strongest camera-focused pick, with a confirmed 200MP-rivaling triple-camera system, a telephoto lens none of the other three phones (except partially) offer, and 4K@60fps video on both cameras, making it the best choice for buyers who photograph and film often.

The Vivo V70 FE (PKR 121,000) is the most expensive phone here and leads on raw performance and display size, but drops the telephoto lens found on its own V70 sibling, making its price harder to justify against the Camon 50 Ultra’s camera versatility. The Infinix Note 60 Pro (PKR 118,000) is the strongest all-round value, combining a display that matches the Camon 50 Ultra, solid performance, and by far the fastest and most versatile charging system in the group, including the only wireless charging on offer.

Bottom line: Skip the Pova 8 unless a massive battery is non-negotiable, since every rival beats it on display, camera, and charging speed for similar money; between the remaining three, choose the Camon 50 Ultra for camera quality, the Note 60 Pro for the best overall balance and fastest charging, and the Vivo V70 FE only if display size and raw performance matter more than telephoto zoom.

Ranking:

  1. Infinix Note 60 Pro – PKR 118,000
  2. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra – PKR 117,000
  3. Vivo V70 FE – PKR 121,000
  4. Tecno Pova 8 – PKR 115,000-120,000

Pros And Cons of Tecno Pova 8

Pros of Mobile

8,000mAh Battery 🔋
144Hz Refresh Rate ⚡
Dimensity 7100 5G 🚀
LPDDR5X RAM 💾
Alive Matrix Display ✨

Cons of Mobile

IPS LCD Panel 📱
45W Charging ⚡
Average Low-Light Camera 🌙
Over Priced☀️

Best For - Not Best For

Best For

Long Battery Life 🔋
Casual Gaming 🎮
5G Connectivity 📶
Smooth Scrolling ⚡
Rugged Users 🛡️
Unique Design ✨

Not Best For

AMOLED Lovers 🖥️
Heavy Gamers 🎮
Night Photography 🌙
Ultra-Light Phones ⚖️
Bright Outdoor Use ☀️

Trailer And Unboxing of Tecno Pova 8

Disassembly Or Teardown And Gaming Test of Tecno Pova 8

Camera Test Tecno Pova 8

Rival Mobiles

Tecno Pova 8 Pro
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Vivo V70 FE
Infinix Note 60 Pro
Infinix Note 60

Comparisions

Tecno Pova 8 vs infinix note 60 pro
Tecno Pova 8 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Tecno Pova 8 vs infinix GT 30 Pro
Tecno Pova 8 vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Tecno Pova 8 vs Tecno Pova 8 pro

Related Comparisions

Related Comparisons

  1. Tecno Pova 7 4G vs Tecno Pova 8
  2. Tecno Pova 7 5G vs Tecno Pova 8
  3. Infinix Hot 70 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8
  4. Infinix Note Edge vs Tecno Pova 8
  5. Oppo Reno 14F vs Tecno Pova 8
  6. Oppo A7 Pro Max vs Tecno Pova 8
  7. Tecno Pova 8 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
TECNO Series Row

TECNO Series

TECNO Phantom Series
Phantom Series
TECNO Pova Series
Pova Series
TECNO Camon Series
Camon Series
TECNO Spark Series
Spark Series
TECNO Pop Series
Pop Series
Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

FAQs Questions

It's powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7100 chipset, a decently capable mid-range performer. Tecno also throws in two of its own home-grown chips to help with network signal and Wi-Fi stability.

It uses a 6.76-inch IPS LCD panel with a 144Hz refresh rate and 1080 x 2344 resolution. It's not AMOLED, but the high refresh rate still makes everyday scrolling and gaming feel notably smooth.

It packs a massive 8,000mAh battery, one of the largest in its class. That kind of capacity should easily carry you through a full day, even with 5G and the 144Hz screen running.

The main camera is a 50MP Sony LYTIA sensor, paired with a secondary lens on the back. It won't top any camera charts, but Tecno positions it as a solid, dependable performer for the price.

Yes, it carries an IP64 rating for dust and water-splash resistance, and it's MIL-STD-810H certified for extra durability. That's a nice bonus for a budget-focused gaming phone.

It comes with up to 8GB RAM and 256GB of storage. That's a comfortable amount of space for apps, games, and media at this price point.

It ships with Android 16, and Tecno promises two major OS upgrades along with three years of security patches. That's a reasonable commitment for this segment.

8 + 256GB = 100,000-120,000 PKR | 380 $ | 35,000 INR

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top