Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- + 3.8x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12+256 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- + 6% lighter Weight (178 g vs 189 g)
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 3.1 vs UFS 2.2
- + Zoom: 3 x
- + Front Sensor: 50 MP=Unknown
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K@ 60 fps 1080p@ 60 fps vs 2K@ 30 fps 1080p@ 60 fps
- + Includes Reverse Charging
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- + 88% higher Peak Brightness (4500 Nits vs 2400 Nits)
- + 23% higher HBM Brightness (1600 Nits vs 1300 Nits)
- + 10% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (990 K vs 900 K)
- + Digital Zoom: 15 x
- + Front Flash: Screen Flash
- + Model Number: LK7
- + IP Rating: IP68 / IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Brand | Tecno | Tecno |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 120000 PKR | 150000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹40000 | ₹50000 |
| Price USA | $420 | $500 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed | 8 + 256GB =50,000 INR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm | 162.5 x 77.3 x 7.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1208 x 2644 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 2400 Nits | 4500 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1300 Nits | 1600 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Dimensity 7400 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 4 × 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 900 K | 990 K |
| Bootup Time | - | 24s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 256GB | 8 + 256 GB 12 + 256 / 512 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+50+8 MP | 50 +8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown | 50 MP = Sony LYT 700C |
| Zoom | 3 x | - |
| Digital Zoom | - | 15 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@ 30 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Unknown | — |
| Front Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@ 60 fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | - | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | 10 W |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 11h 23m | 10h 40m |
| Charging Time | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) | 1h 15m |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | LK7 |
| Release Date | 2 March, 2026 | 18 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | Pova Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 189 g |
| Build | glass back , plastic frame | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 / IP69K |
| Special Features | – | Matrix display (on the back) Camera Module |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) | 144Hz AMOLED Display ✅ |
| Cons | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) | 45W Charging Speed ❌ |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | Mobile Gaming 🎯 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | Flagship Performance 🚫 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Tecno Pova 8 Pro |
| Unboxing | — | |
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V70 FE
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Realme 15 Pro
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V60
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Pova 7 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- vivo V50 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Realme 15 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15F
- Tecno Pova 8 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











