vivo x300 pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the vivo x300 pro
- 4.0x better Camera (200 + 50 + 50 MP vs 50 + 50 + 12 MP)
- 56% higher Front Camera (50 MP vs 32 MP)
- 33% more RAM Memory (16 + 512 GB vs 12 + 512 GB)
- 29% higher Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 3500 nits)
- Better Screen Type: LTPO Amoled vs AMOLED
- Front Flash: No
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 35% higher Zoom (5 x vs 3.7 x)
- 25% higher HBM Brightness (2000 nits vs 1600 nits)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 20% higher Digital Zoom (120 x vs 100 X)
- 11% higher Charging Watts (100 W vs 90 W)
- 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- 8% larger Battery (7000 mAh vs 6510 mAh)
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | vivo x300 pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
| Brand | Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 320000 PKR | 265000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹120000 | ₹80000 |
| Price USA | $1050 | $750 |
| Variants Prices | 12+256GB | 12 + 512 GB 12 + 1 TB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.0 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm | 162.2 x 77.5 x 8.3 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1260 x 2800 Pixels | 1280 x 2772 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO Amoled | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 2000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Dimensity 9500 |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 4.21 GHz | 4.21 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 1 x 4.21GHz (C1-Ultra) | 1 x 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra |
| GPU | Arm/Mali G1-Ultra | Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 3.5 M | 3.4 M |
| Bootup Time | 21s | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16 + 512 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+256GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 200 + 50 + 50 MP | 50 + 50 + 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16,320 × 12,240 pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 200 MP = Samsung ISOCELL HPB | 50 MP = Omnivision 950 LightHunter |
| Zoom | 3.7 x | 5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 100 X | 120 x |
| Video Recording | 8K@30fps | 8K@30 fps |
| Flash | LED Flash | Dual LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP = Samsung S5KJN1 | – |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 6528 × 4896 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@60fps | 4K @ 30fps |
| Front Flash | No | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 40 W | 50 W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | 22.5W |
| Reverse Wireless | Yes | Not Confirm |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 15 hours | - |
| Charging Time | 50m-60m (0% To 100%) | 40–45 minutes ( 0-100% ) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | V2514 | 2602EPTC0G |
| Release Date | 13 October, 2025 | 28 May, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Vivo X Series | Xiaomi Number |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17, OriginOS 7 | Android 17 , HyperOS 4 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 226 g | 219 grams |
| Build | Aluminum Frame And Glass Front | Aluminium Alloy +Glass back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | – | Leica Summilux lens system (1G + 6P) with optical image stabilization |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 120Hz LTPO AMOLED | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED |
| Cons | ❌ No SD Slot | ❌ No MicroSD |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Gaming | ✅ Telephoto Photography |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | ❌ Lightweight Phone Users |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus | — |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works