• Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors

✪ vivo x300 pro ✪

Vivo x300 Pro Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)
United States flag United States
$1,250 USD
…
Pakistan flag Pakistan (PKR)
340,000 PKR
India flag India (INR)
₹120,000 INR

✪ vivo x300 pro ✪

Vivo x300 Pro Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)
Last Time Update : 7 October, 2026
0

Quick Specifications

LTPO Amoled

Display Type

Dimensity 9500

Processor

16 + 512 GB

Ram And Memory

200 + 50 + 50 MP

Camera

6510 mAh

Battery

90 W

Fast Charging

Full Specification

BASIC INFO
Mobile
vivo x300 pro
Model
V2514
Series
Vivo X Series
Category
Flagship
Release Date
13 October,2025
Year
2025
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+
WiFi
Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 17, OriginOS 7
BODY
Dimensions
162.0 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm
Build
Aluminum Frame And Glass Front
KG Weight
226 g
Screen Size
6.78 inch
Resolution
1260 x 2800 Pixels
Type
LTPO Amoled
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
4500 nits
HBM Brightness
1600 nits
Processor
Dimensity 9500
Processor Link
Max Clock
4.21 GHz
Lithography
3 nm
GPU
Arm/Mali G1-Ultra
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
3.5 M
Bootup Time
21s
Architecture
1 x 4.21GHz (C1-Ultra)
3 x 3.5GHz (C1-Premium)
4 x 2.7GHz (C1-Pro)
Ram Memory
16 + 512 GB
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.1
SD Card
No
Variants
12+256GB
16+512GB
16+1TB
MP
Rear Camera
200 + 50 + 50 MP
Front Camera
50 MP
SENSORS
Camera Sensors
200 MP = Samsung ISOCELL HPB
50 MP   = Samsung S5KJN1
50 MP   = Sony LYT-828
Front Sensors
50 MP = Samsung S5KJN1
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
8K@30fps
4K@120fps
1080p@240fps
Front Recording
4K@60fps
1080p@60fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
16,320 × 12,240 pixels
Front Resolution
8192 x 6144 Pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
3.7 x
D Digital Zoom
100 X
Stabilization
Yes
FLASH
Flash
LED Flash
Capacity
6510 mAh
Fast Charging
90 W
Wireless Charging
40 W
Li Battery Type
Silicon-Carbon
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
Yes
OTHER
Battery PC Marks
15 hours
Charging Time
50m-60m (0% To 100%)
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Hyper Sonic Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Proximity
Compass
Hall sensor
Special Features

–

BASIC INFO
Mobile
vivo x300 pro
Model
V2514
Series
Vivo X Series
Category
Flagship
Release Date
13 October,2025
Year
2025
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+
WiFi
Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 17, OriginOS 7
BODY
Dimensions
162.0 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm
Build
Aluminum Frame And Glass Front
KG Weight
226 g
Screen Size
6.78 inch
Resolution
1260 x 2800 Pixels
Type
LTPO Amoled
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
4500 nits
HBM Brightness
1600 nits
Processor
Dimensity 9500
Processor Link
Max Clock
4.21 GHz
Lithography
3 nm
GPU
Arm/Mali G1-Ultra
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
3.5 M
Bootup Time
21s
Architecture
1 x 4.21GHz (C1-Ultra)
3 x 3.5GHz (C1-Premium)
4 x 2.7GHz (C1-Pro)
Ram Memory
16 + 512 GB
SD Card
No
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.1
Variants
12+256GB
16+512GB
16+1TB
MP
Rear Camera
200 + 50 + 50 MP
Front Camera
50 MP
SENSORS
Main Camera Sensors
200 MP = Samsung ISOCELL HPB
50 MP   = Samsung S5KJN1
50 MP   = Sony LYT-828
Front Camera Sensors
50 MP = Samsung S5KJN1
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
8K@30fps
4K@120fps
1080p@240fps
Front Recording
4K@60fps
1080p@60fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
16,320 × 12,240 pixels
Front Resolution
8192 x 6144 Pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
3.7 x
D Digital Zoom
100 X
Stabilization
Yes
FLASH
Flash
LED Flash
Capacity
6510 mAh
Fast Charging
90 W
Wireless Charging
40 W
Li Battery Type
Silicon-Carbon
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
Yes
OTHER
Battery Life PCMark
15 hours
Charging Time
50m-60m (0% To 100%)
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Hyper Sonic Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Proximity
Compass
Hall sensor
Special Features

–

Highlights & Review Of vivo x300 pro

Display Review:

The Vivo X300 Pro leads this group with a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED panel at 1260 × 2800 pixels (1.5K), a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate (1–120Hz LTPO), 2160Hz PWM dimming, and a staggering 4,500 nits peak brightness with HDR10+, HDR Vivid, and Dolby Vision support, making it the brightest and most color-accurate display in this comparison.

The Xiaomi 17T Pro matches the X300 Pro’s size with a 6.83-inch AMOLED display at 1280 × 2772 pixels (1.5K), but pushes further with a 144Hz refresh rate, 480Hz touch sampling (3,500Hz instantaneous), Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, and up to 3,200 nits peak brightness, offering smoother motion for gaming and video, though it lacks LTPO adaptive refresh and Dolby Vision.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus uses a 6.7-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel at 1440 × 3120 pixels (QHD+), a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate (1–120Hz LTPO), HDR10+, and 2,600 nits peak brightness with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, delivering the sharpest pixel density (~516 ppi) and best outdoor readability in the group, though it trails the X300 Pro in peak brightness and HDR format support.

The RedMagic 11 Pro features a 6.85-inch AMOLED display at 1216 × 2688 pixels (1.5K), a 144Hz refresh rate, 431 ppi pixel density, and 2,000 nits peak brightness (1,800 nits HBM), with BOE AMOLED panel technology optimized for gaming, but it lacks LTPO adaptive refresh, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, making it the least versatile for media consumption despite its high refresh rate

Verdict

The Vivo X300 Pro dominates with its 4,500 nits peak brightness, LTPO adaptive refresh, and triple HDR support (HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision), making it the best choice for outdoor visibility, color accuracy, and media consumption. The Xiaomi 17T Pro offers the smoothest 144Hz refresh rate and highest touch sampling for gaming, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus delivers the sharpest QHD+ resolution and best pixel density. The RedMagic 11 Pro targets gamers with its 144Hz BOE AMOLED panel but lacks LTPO, HDR, and peak brightness, making it the least versatile for general use.

Processor Review:

The Vivo X300 Pro is powered by MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500 (3nm) chipset with a tri-cluster CPU layout (1x C1-Ultra at 4.21 GHz, 3x C1-Premium at 3.5 GHz, 4x C1-Pro at 2.7 GHz) and Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 GPU, scoring ~3,331,723 to 4,011,932 points on AnTuTu v11 depending on the variant (global vs. Chinese model), with the Chinese Satellite Edition reaching 4,090,624 points.phonearena+8

The Xiaomi 17T Pro uses the same Dimensity 9500 (3nm) chipset but typically scores ~3,350,000 to 3,416,530 points on AnTuTu v11, with Geekbench 6 single-core at 2,903 and multi-core at 9,145, making it marginally slower than the X300 Pro due to thermal throttling and tuning differences, though both phones share identical silicon.phonearena+2

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus comes in two variants: the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) model scores ~3,670,711 to 3,752,886 points on AnTuTu v11, while the Exynos 2600 variant scores ~3,115,908 points, with Geekbench 6 single-core at 3,696–3,727 and multi-core at ~10,982, making the Snapdragon variant the fastest in this group for CPU tasks but trailing the RedMagic 11 Pro in sustained gaming due to thermal constraints.comparigon+3

The RedMagic 11 Pro features the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) with Adreno 840 GPU, scoring ~4,002,199 to 4,208,874 points on AnTuTu v11, the highest in this comparison, thanks to its aggressive gaming-tuned cooling system and unlocked performance mode, though it throttles by ~27.5% under sustained load compared to the Dimensity 9500’s ~6.2% drop, making it the peak performance leader but less efficient for long sessions

AnTuTu v11 Percentage Difference

  • RedMagic 11 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro: +18–20% faster (4.2M vs 3.5M average)

  • RedMagic 11 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro: +22–24% faster (4.2M vs 3.4M average)

  • RedMagic 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon): +12–14% faster (4.2M vs 3.7M average)

  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon) vs Vivo X300 Pro: +5–8% faster (3.7M vs 3.5M average)

  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon) vs Xiaomi 17T Pro: +9–11% faster (3.7M vs 3.4M average)

  • Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro: +3–5% faster (3.5M vs 3.4M average)

  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Exynos) vs Vivo X300 Pro: -6–8% slower (3.1M vs 3.5M average)

Verdict

The RedMagic 11 Pro leads in raw AnTuTu v11 scores (~4.0–4.2M points) and peak gaming performance, but suffers from ~27.5% thermal throttling under sustained load, making it best for short gaming bursts. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon) offers the best CPU performance (~3.67–3.75M points) for multitasking and productivity, while the Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17T Pro (both Dimensity 9500) deliver balanced performance (~3.33–4.01M points) with superior thermal efficiency (~6% throttling), making them ideal for all-day use and sustained workloads. For Pakistani buyers, the Xiaomi 17T Pro at PKR 262,000 offers the best value, while the Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 320,000 justifies its premium with better tuning and camera integration.

Ram & Memory Review:

The Vivo X300 Pro comes in a 16GB + 512GB configuration with LPDDR5X Ultra RAM and UFS 4.1 storage, offering the fastest memory bandwidth in this group for sustained multitasking, app reloads, and large file transfers, though it lacks microSD expansion.gadgets360

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is available in 12GB + 512GB (and optional 256GB/1TB) with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage, matching the X300 Pro’s storage speed but trailing in RAM capacity, which may impact heavy multitasking and app retention under sustained load.androidcentral

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus offers 12GB + 256GB (or 512GB) with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, plus RAM Plus virtual memory (up to 12GB), delivering balanced performance for everyday use but slower storage speeds compared to the UFS 4.1-equipped rivals, and no microSD slot.phonearena+3

The RedMagic 11 Pro leads with 16GB + 512GB (and optional 24GB + 1TB) using LPDDR5T RAM (a newer, faster standard than LPDDR5X) and UFS 4.1 Pro storage, offering the highest memory bandwidth and fastest sequential read/write speeds in this comparison, optimized for gaming, large asset loading, and sustained performance, though it also lacks expandable storage.techadvisor+13

The RedMagic 11 Pro dominates with 16GB LPDDR5T + 512GB UFS 4.1 Pro, offering the fastest memory and storage speeds for gaming and heavy workloads, while the Vivo X300 Pro matches its 16GB RAM but uses slightly slower LPDDR5X Ultra + UFS 4.1, making it ideal for sustained multitasking and content creation. The Xiaomi 17T Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus both use 12GB LPDDR5X, with the Xiaomi offering faster UFS 4.1 storage and the Samsung relying on UFS 4.0 with RAM Plus virtual memory, making them better suited for everyday users who prioritize value over peak performance. For Pakistani buyers, the Xiaomi 17T Pro at PKR 262,000 offers the best value, while the Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 320,000 justifies its premium with superior RAM capacity and tuning.

Cameras Review:

The Vivo X300 Pro features a triple rear camera system with a 50MP Sony LYT-828 main sensor (1/1.28″, f/1.6, OIS, Zeiss T* coating), a 200MP Samsung ISOCELL HPB telephoto (1/1.4″, 3.5x optical zoom, f/2.67, OIS, Zeiss APO), and a 50MP Samsung ISOCELL JN1 ultrawide (1/2.76″, f/2.0, 119° FOV, AF), plus a 50MP Samsung ISOCELL JN1 front camera (f/2.0, 20mm). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main only), 4K@120fps (main + telephoto), 4K@60fps (all rear cameras), and 10-bit Log + Dolby Vision HDR, with front video at 4K@60fps and 1080p@30fps.vivo+4

The Xiaomi 17T Pro uses a triple rear camera system with a 50MP Light Fusion 950 main sensor (1/1.3″, f/1.67, OIS, Leica Summilux), a 50MP periscope telephoto (5x optical zoom, 115mm, f/3.0, OIS, Leica), and a 12MP ultrawide (15mm, f/2.2, 120° FOV), plus a 32MP front camera (f/2.2, 21mm). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main only), 4K@120fps (main with crop), 4K@60fps (all rear cameras), and 4K Log (main + telephoto), with front video at 4K@30fps and 1080p@60fps.mi+5

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus offers a triple rear camera system with a 50MP main sensor (f/1.8, OIS), a 10MP telephoto (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, OIS), and a 12MP ultrawide (120° FOV, f/2.2), plus a 12MP front camera (f/2.2, 26mm). It records rear video up to 8K@24/30fps (main only), 4K@60fps (all rear cameras), and 10-bit HDR10+, with front video at 4K@60fps and 1080p@30fps.gadgets360

The RedMagic 11 Pro features a dual rear camera system with a 50MP OmniVision OV50E40 main sensor (1/1.55″, f/1.9, OIS) and a 50MP OmniVision OV50D40 ultrawide (1/2.88″, f/2.2, 14mm), but lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, plus a 16MP front camera (f/2.0). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main + ultrawide), 4K@60fps (all rear cameras), with front video capped at 1080p@30fps, making it the least versatile for photography and video in this group.

Verdict

The Vivo X300 Pro dominates with its 200MP Zeiss APO telephoto, 50MP main + ultrawide, 8K@30fps + 4K@120fps video, and 10-bit Log + Dolby Vision HDR, making it the best choice for photography enthusiasts and content creators. The Xiaomi 17T Pro offers a strong 50MP Leica main + 5x periscope telephoto system with 8K@30fps + 4K@120fps video, though it lacks the X300 Pro’s telephoto resolution and HDR support. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus provides a reliable 50MP + 10MP 3x telephoto + 12MP ultrawide setup with 8K@30fps video, but trails in telephoto reach and sensor quality. The RedMagic 11 Pro is the weakest, with no telephoto lens, 50MP main + ultrawide only, and 1080p@30fps front video, making it unsuitable for serious photography or video work despite its gaming focus. For Pakistani buyers, the Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 320,000 justifies its premium with superior camera hardware, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro at PKR 262,000 offers the best value for Leica-tuned photography.

Battery Review:

The Vivo X300 Pro is equipped with a 6,510mAh silicon-carbon battery and supports 90W wired fast charging, 40W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging, reaching 0–100% in approximately 35–40 minutes under test conditions, with strong endurance for all-day use and heavy photography workloads.mobiledokan

The Xiaomi 17T Pro features a massive 7,000mAh silicon-carbon battery with 100W wired fast charging (PD3.0, QC4), 50W wireless charging, and 22.5W reverse wired charging, hitting 0–100% in about 30–35 minutes (33% in 10 minutes, 79% in 30 minutes), offering the best balance of capacity and charging speed in this group for extended screen-on time and rapid top-ups.gsmarena+1

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus uses a smaller 4,900mAh battery with 45W wired fast charging (Super Fast Charging 2.0), 20–25W wireless charging (Qi2), and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, achieving 0–100% in roughly 55–60 minutes (69% in 30 minutes, 80% in 36 minutes), making it the slowest to charge and least enduring in this comparison, though sufficient for moderate daily use.techadvisor+3

The RedMagic 11 Pro leads in raw capacity with a 7,500mAh battery and supports 80W wired + 80W wireless charging, plus reverse wired/wireless charging, reaching 0–100% in approximately 40–45 minutes, with the longest potential screen-on time for gaming and heavy workloads, though its charging speed trails the Xiaomi 17T Pro’s 100W system.tomsguide+1

Verdict

The Xiaomi 17T Pro dominates with its 7,000mAh battery + 100W wired + 50W wireless charging, offering the best combination of capacity and charging speed for extended use and rapid top-ups. The RedMagic 11 Pro leads in raw capacity with 7,500mAh + 80W wired/wireless, making it ideal for gaming marathons, while the Vivo X300 Pro provides balanced 6,510mAh + 90W wired + 40W wireless performance for photography and all-day endurance. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus trails with 4,900mAh + 45W wired + 20–25W wireless, making it the least suitable for heavy users and fast-charging enthusiasts. For Pakistani buyers, the Xiaomi 17T Pro at PKR 262,000 offers the best value, while the Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 320,000 justifies its premium with superior camera integration and balanced battery life.

Final Verdict :

1. Vivo X300 Pro – Best Overall Flagship

Price: PKR 320,000 (16GB + 512GB)
Strengths: The X300 Pro offers the most balanced flagship experience with its 200MP Zeiss APO telephoto, 50MP main + 50MP ultrawide camera system, 8K@30fps + 4K@120fps 10-bit Log video, 6.78-inch 4,500 nits LTPO AMOLED display, Dimensity 9500 chipset (~3.33–4.01M AnTuTu v11), 16GB LPDDR5X Ultra + 512GB UFS 4.1, and 6,510mAh battery with 90W wired + 40W wireless charging. It outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro in camera versatility and display brightness, while matching or exceeding the Galaxy S26 Plus and RedMagic 11 Pro in key areas at a competitive price.wikipedia+19

2. Xiaomi 17T Pro – Best Value Flagship Killer

Price: PKR 262,000 (12GB + 512GB)
Strengths: The Xiaomi 17T Pro excels with its 50MP Leica main + 50MP 5x periscope telephoto camera system, 8K@30fps + 4K@120fps video, 6.83-inch 144Hz AMOLED display, Dimensity 9500 chipset (~3.35–3.42M AnTuTu v11), 12GB LPDDR5X + 512GB UFS 4.1, and massive 7,000mAh battery with 100W wired + 50W wireless charging. It offers the best value in this group, with flagship-tier camera and battery performance at a significantly lower price, though it trails the X300 Pro in RAM capacity, display brightness, and telephoto resolution.gsmarena+1

3. RedMagic 11 Pro – Best Gaming & Peak Performance

Price: PKR 300,000 (16GB + 512GB)
Strengths: The RedMagic 11 Pro leads in raw performance with its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset (~4.0–4.2M AnTuTu v11), 16GB LPDDR5T + 512GB UFS 4.1 Pro, 6.85-inch 144Hz AMOLED display, and massive 7,500mAh battery with 80W wired + 80W wireless charging, making it the best choice for gaming and sustained peak performance. However, it lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, has weaker camera sensors, and offers 1080p@30fps front video, making it less suitable for photography and content creation compared to the X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17T Pro.

4. Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus – Best Display & Ecosystem (But Overpriced)

Price: PKR 343,000 (12GB + 256GB)
Strengths: The Galaxy S26 Plus offers a refined 6.7-inch QHD+ Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display (~516 ppi), 50MP main + 10MP 3x telephoto + 12MP ultrawide camera system, 8K@30fps video, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset (~3.67–3.75M AnTuTu v11), 12GB LPDDR5X + 256GB UFS 4.0, and 4,900mAh battery with 45W wired + 20–25W wireless charging. It excels in display sharpness, ecosystem integration, and software support, but its smaller battery, slower charging, lower RAM/storage, and higher price make it the least value-for-money option in this comparison.

Final Recommendation

  • Best Overall: Vivo X300 Pro – unmatched camera versatility, display brightness, and balanced flagship specs.

  • Best Value: Xiaomi 17T Pro – flagship-tier camera and battery at the lowest price.

  • Best for Gaming: RedMagic 11 Pro – peak performance and largest battery for gaming marathons.

  • Best for Ecosystem: Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus – sharp display and software support, but overpriced for its specs.

FeatureVivo X300 ProXiaomi 17T ProRedMagic 11 ProSamsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Display6.78″ 4,500 nits LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz6.83″ 3,200 nits AMOLED, 144Hz6.85″ 2,000 nits AMOLED, 144Hz6.7″ 2,600 nits QHD+ LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz
Main Camera50MP Sony LYT-828 + 200MP Zeiss telephoto50MP Leica + 50MP 5x periscope50MP OV50E40 (no telephoto)50MP + 10MP 3x telephoto
Video8K@30fps, 4K@120fps 10-bit Log8K@30fps, 4K@120fps8K@30fps, 4K@60fps8K@30fps, 4K@60fps
ChipsetDimensity 9500 (~3.33–4.01M AnTuTu)Dimensity 9500 (~3.35–3.42M AnTuTu)Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (~4.0–4.2M AnTuTu)Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (~3.67–3.75M AnTuTu)
RAM + Storage16GB + 512GB (LPDDR5X Ultra + UFS 4.1)12GB + 512GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)16GB + 512GB (LPDDR5T + UFS 4.1 Pro)12GB + 256GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.0)
Battery6,510mAh, 90W wired + 40W wireless7,000mAh, 100W wired + 50W wireless7,500mAh, 80W wired + 80W wireless4,900mAh, 45W wired + 20–25W wireless
Price (PKR)320,000262,000300,000343,000

Pros And Cons of vivo x300 pro

Pros of Mobile

✅ 120Hz LTPO AMOLED
✅ Dimensity 9500
✅ 50MP Zeiss Cameras
✅ 6000mAh Battery
✅ 90W Fast Charging
✅ IP68/IP69 Protection

Cons of Mobile

❌ No SD Slot
❌ Curved Display
❌ No Headphone Jack
❌ Premium Pricing
❌ Heavy Weight
❌ China Availability

Best For - Not Best For

Best For

✅ Mobile Gaming
✅ Content Creation
✅ Photography Lovers
✅ 4K Recording
✅ Power Users
✅ Outdoor Usage

Not Best For

❌ Budget Buyers
❌ Compact Fans
❌ MicroSD Users
❌ 3.5mm Users
❌ Lightweight Preference
❌ Casual Users

Trailer And Unboxing of vivo x300 pro

Disassembly Or Teardown And Gaming Test of vivo x300 pro

Camera Test vivo x300 pro

Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S26
Red Magic 11 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17T Pro

VIVO Series Row
Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

FAQs Questions

Vivo X300 Pro features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and up to 4,500 nits peak brightness, delivering sharp visuals and excellent outdoor visibility.

Yes, the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset with up to 16GB RAM provides smooth gaming, fast multitasking, and responsive everyday performance.

Its 50MP triple rear camera system with Zeiss optics captures detailed photos, while the 50MP front camera delivers sharp selfies and clear video calls.

The 6,000mAh battery easily lasts a full day, and 90W wired charging quickly gets you back to full power.

Yes, it supports 5G, NFC, eSIM, Wi-Fi 7, and 50W wireless charging for a complete flagship experience.

Yes, it carries IP68 and IP69 ratings, offering strong protection against dust, water, and high-pressure water jets.

Vivo X300 Pro is available in 12GB or 16GB RAM options with 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage.

Yes, it supports 8K video recording on the rear camera and 4K recording on both the front and rear cameras.

16 + 512 GB = 340,000 PKR | 1250 $ | 120,000 INR

Scroll to Top