Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Redmi Note 17 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- + 3.1x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 16 MP)
- + 2.0x better RAM Memory (12+256 GB vs 6 + 256 GB)
- + 20% lighter Weight (178 g vs 223 grams)
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 8% higher Max Clock (2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 7400 vs Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
- + Better RAM Type: LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
- + Zoom: 3 x
- + Higher Video Recording: 4K@ 30 fps 1080p@ 60 fps vs 1080p @ 30
- + Front Sensor: 50 MP=Unknown
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K@ 60 fps 1080p@ 60 fps vs 1080p @ 30
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Special Features: –
Reasons to consider the Redmi Note 17 Pro
- + 49% higher Charging Watts (67 W vs 45 W)
- + 46% higher Peak Brightness (3500 nits vs 2400 Nits)
- + 38% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1300 Nits)
- + 28% larger Battery (8340 mAh vs 6500 mAh)
- + 6% higher Screen Resolution (1280 × 2772 Pixels vs 1208 x 2644 Pixels)
- + Model Number: 2609FRA74G
- + IP Rating: IP68 / IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Redmi Note 17 Pro |
| Brand | Tecno | Xiaomi |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 120000 PKR | 120000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹40000 | ₹35000 |
| Price USA | $420 | $500 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = Not Confirmed | 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77 x 7.8 mm | 2607DRA18G |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1280 × 2772 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 2400 Nits | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1300 Nits | 1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 | Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 4×2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 | 4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MP2 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 900 K | 870 K |
| Bootup Time | - | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 6 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 8 + 256GB | 6 + 128/256 |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+50+8 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50MP=Sony LYT-700C 50MP=Samsung 8 MP = Unknown | 50 MP = Samsung S5KJN5< /strong> |
| Zoom | 3 x | — |
| Digital Zoom | - | — |
| Video Recording | 4K@ 30 fps | 1080p @ 30 |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Unknown | — |
| Front Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@ 60 fps | 1080p @ 30 |
| Front Flash | - | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 8340 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | 22.5 W |
| Reverse Wireless | No | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 11h 23m | — |
| Charging Time | 1h 25 mints ( 0% - 100%) | — |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | — | 2609FRA74G |
| Release Date | 2 March, 2026 | 28 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | redmi Note |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 223 grams |
| Build | glass back , plastic frame | plastic back, plastic frame |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 / IP69K |
| Special Features | – | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes / region dependent |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED (144Hz Display) | ✅ Huge 8340mAh Battery 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌ No Headphone Jack (3.5mm Port) | ❌ Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ⚙️ |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Long Battery Life 🔋 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | 🚫 Hardcore Gaming 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Infinix Note 60 Pro | Vivo V70 FE |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V70 FE
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Realme 15 Pro
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs vivo V60
- Infinix Zero 40 5G vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Infinix Note 60 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Tecno Camon 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15F
- Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Redmi Note 17 Pro vs Redmi Note 17
- Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus vs Redmi Note 17 Pro
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











