Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K@30 fps 1080p@30/60 fps vs 1080p @ 60 fps
- + Includes Reverse Charging
Reasons to consider the Poco X8 Pro
- + 2.2x better Charging Watts (100 W vs 45 W)
- + 54% higher Front Camera (20 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 25% higher HBM Brightness (2000 nits vs 1600 nits)
- + 25% smaller Lithography Process (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- + 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- + Peak Brightness: 3500 nits
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8500 vs Dimensity 8400
- + Zoom: Not Confirm
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Mid-Range Performance
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Poco X8 Pro |
| Brand | infinix | Poco |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 160000 PKR | 155000🚫 PKR |
| Price India | ₹35000 | ₹44000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $450 |
| Variants Prices | 12+ 256GB = 152,000 PKR | 370 $ | 34,000 INR | 8 + 256 GB 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm | 157.5 x 75.2 x 8.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.59 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1268 x 2756 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | - | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 2000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 | Dimensity 8500 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.25 GHz | 1 x 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 (7-core) | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.1 M | 2.2 M |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony IMX896 (OIS) | 50 MP = Sony IMX882 |
| Zoom | - | Not Confirm |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | 10 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K @ 60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 | 20 MP = Omnivision OV20B |
| Front Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | 5184 × 3888 pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 1080p @ 60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | 27 W |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | Not Confirm |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 40–50 minutes ( 0-100% ) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6891 | 2511FPC34G |
| Release Date | 25 April, 2026 | 17 March, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | GT Series | Poco X |
| Category | - | Mid-Range Performance |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 17 , HyperOS 4 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 198 grams | 201 grams |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Aluminium Frame+ glass back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | Vapor chamber cooling |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Dimensity 8400 | 🖥️ Vivid AMOLED display (6.59″ 1.5K, 120Hz, 3500 nits) |
| Cons | ❌No optical zoom | 📷 Weak ultrawide camera (only 8MP) |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy gamers | 🎮 Heavy gamers/multitaskers |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography fans | 🔭 Zoom photography fans |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Realme GT 7T | — |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Motorola Edge 70 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- Poco X8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Poco X8 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T
- Poco X8 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro Max
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Poco X8 Pro vs Poco X8 Power
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











