Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- + 10.0x better Digital Zoom (100 x vs 10 X)
- + 3.8x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 2.8x better Charging Watts (125 W vs 45 W)
- + 33% more RAM Memory (16+1TB vs 12 +256 GB)
- + 28% higher Camera (64+50+50 MP vs 50 + 8 MP)
- + Better Screen Type: P-OLED vs AMOLED
- + Peak Brightness: 2500 nits
- + Zoom: 3 x
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Mid-Premium Smartphone
- + IP Rating: ip 68
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
- + 44% larger Battery (6500 mAH vs 4500 mAH)
- + 40% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.1 M vs 1.5 M)
- + 8% higher Max Clock (3.25 GHz vs 3.0 GHz)
- + 7% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs 1500 nits)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8400 vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Model Number: X6891
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | Infinix GT 50 Pro |
| Brand | Motorola | infinix |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 170000 PKR | 160000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹55000 | ₹35000 |
| Price USA | $500 | $400 |
| Variants Prices | 16 + 512 GB = Unknown | 50,000 INR | Not Confirm | 12+ 256GB = 152,000 PKR | 370 $ | 34,000 INR |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm | 162.4 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1220 x 2712 Pixels | 1208 x 2644 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 2500 nits | - |
| HBM Brightness | 1500 nits | 1600 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Dimensity 8400 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.0 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.0GHz | 1 x 3.25 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC8 | Mali-G720 (7-core) |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.5 M | 2.1 M |
| Bootup Time | 22s | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16+1TB | 12 +256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 16 + 512 GB | 12+ 256GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 64+50+50 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 Pixels | 8160 x 6144 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = OmniVision OV50H (Main) | 50 MP = Sony IMX896 (OIS) |
| Zoom | 3 x | - |
| Digital Zoom | 100 x | 10 X |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps | 4K@30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP =Samsung S5KJN1 | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 4128 x 3096 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 60 | 4K@30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 4500 mAH | 6500 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 125 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | 30 W |
| Reverse Charging | - | 10 W |
| Reverse Wireless | 10 W | 5 W |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12h 40m | - |
| Charging Time | 25 minutes (0% to 100%) | 100% in 45-60 min |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | - | X6891 |
| Release Date | 15 May, 2024 | 25 April, 2026 |
| Year | 2024 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Edge Series | GT Series |
| Category | Mid-Premium Smartphone | - |
| Android OS | Android 14, up to 3 major OS updates | Android 17 , XOS 17 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 198 grams |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Back Lather | Plastic ( Frame And Back) |
| IP Rating | ip 68 | — |
| Special Features | UWB support | RGB notification light on the back |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4v | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz Display | ✅Dimensity 8400 |
| Cons | ❌ No 8K Video | ❌No optical zoom |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | ✅ Heavy gamers |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | ❌Zoom photography fans |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Xiaomi 14T | Realme GT 7T |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix Note 60 Ultra
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Vivo X200 FE
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Realme 16 Pro Plus
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











