Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
- + 2.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.1 M vs 1 M)
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12 +256 GB vs 8 + 512 GB)
- + 25% higher Max Clock (3.25 GHz vs 2.6 GHz)
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 14% lighter Weight (198 grams vs 229 grams)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8400 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
- + Digital Zoom: 10 X
- + Front Sensor: 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0
- + Front Flash: Screen Flash
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Special Features: RGB notification light on the back Li…
Reasons to consider the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- + 2.5x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 13 MP)
- + 2.2x better Charging Watts (100 W vs 45 W)
- + 54% larger Battery (10,000 mAh vs 6500 mAH)
- + 25% higher HBM Brightness (2000 nits vs 1600 nits)
- + 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- + 6% higher Screen Resolution (1280 × 2772 Pixels vs 1208 x 2644 Pixels)
- + Peak Brightness: 3500 nits
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Mid Range
- + IP Rating: IP68 / IP69K
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Redmi Note 17 Pro Max |
| Brand | infinix | Xiaomi |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 160000 PKR | 200000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹35000 | ₹57000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $620 |
| Variants Prices | 12+ 256GB = 152,000 PKR | 370 $ | 34,000 INR | 8+256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm | 163.4 x 78.3 x 8.6 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1280 × 2772 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | - | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 2000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.25 GHz | 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 (7-core) | Adreno 812 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.1 M | 1 M |
| Bootup Time | - | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256 GB | 8 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 (256GB / 512GB) , UFS 2.2 (128GB) |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256GB | 8 + 128GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony IMX896 (OIS) | 50 MP = Samsung S5KJN5< /strong> |
| Zoom | - | — |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | — |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 | — |
| Front Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | 6532 × 4899 pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 10,000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | 27 W |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | — |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 1:01 hr tested by Nanoreview |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6891 | 2609FRA74G |
| Release Date | 25 April, 2026 | 28 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | GT Series | redmi Note |
| Category | - | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 198 grams | 229 grams |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | plastic back, plastic frame |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 / IP69K |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes / region dependent |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Dimensity 8400 | ✅ Massive Battery 🔋 — 9,210–10,000mAh battery |
| Cons | ❌No optical zoom | ❌ Weak Performance 🎮 — Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy gamers | 🎯 Heavy Battery Users 🔋 |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography fans | 🚫 Hardcore Gamers 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Realme GT 7T | Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Realme Narzo Power vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- Realme 16 Pro Plus vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Honor X9d vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Realme P4 Power
- Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Poco X8 Power
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











