Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A57
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
- + 54% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.1 M vs 1.36 M)
- + 50% more RAM Memory (12 +256 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- + 33% higher HBM Brightness (1600 nits vs ~1200 nits)
- + 30% larger Battery (6500 mAH vs 5000 mAH)
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 12% higher Max Clock (3.25 GHz vs 2.9 GHz)
- + 12% higher Screen Resolution (1208 x 2644 Pixels vs 1080 x 2340 Pixels)
- + 8% higher Front Camera (13 MP vs 12 MP)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8400 vs Exynos 1680
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
- + Better Digital Zoom: 10 X vs Not Confirm
- + Front Flash: Screen Flash
- + Special Features: RGB notification light on the back Li…
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A57
- + 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- + 10% lighter Weight (179 g vs 198 grams)
- + Better Screen Type: Super AMOLED vs AMOLED
- + Peak Brightness: 1900 nits
- + Zoom: Not Confirm
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Category: Mid Range
- + IP Rating: ip 68
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A57 |
| Brand | infinix | Samsung |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 160000 PKR | 148000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹35000 | ₹49000 |
| Price USA | $400 | $500 |
| Variants Prices | 12+ 256GB = 152,000 PKR | 370 $ | 34,000 INR | 8 + 256 GB _______________________________ |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm | 161.5 × 76.8 × 6.9 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.7 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1080 x 2340 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | - | 1900 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | ~1200 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 | Exynos 1680 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.25 GHz | 1×2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 (7-core) | Xclipse 550 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.1 M | 1.36 M |
| Bootup Time | - | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256GB | 8 + 128/256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 12 + 5 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony IMX896 (OIS) | 50 MP = Sony IMX906 |
| Zoom | - | Not Confirm |
| Digital Zoom | 10 X | Not Confirm |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Front Sensor | 13 MP = GalaxyCore GC13A0 | 12 MP = Not Confirm |
| Front Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | 4000 × 3000 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAH | 5000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 30 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 10 W | No |
| Reverse Wireless | 5 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | Not Confirm |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | Not Confirm |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6891 | SM-A576B |
| Release Date | 25 April, 2026 | 9 April, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | GT Series | A Series |
| Category | - | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 17, up to 5 major OS updates |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 198 grams | 179 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Aluminum frame , Glass back |
| IP Rating | — | ip 68 |
| Special Features | RGB notification light on the back | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM, Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅Dimensity 8400 | 120Hz AMOLED Display 📱 |
| Cons | ❌No optical zoom | No Front Autofocus 🤳 |
| Best For | ✅ Heavy gamers | Media Consumption 🎬 |
| Not Best For | ❌Zoom photography fans | Hardcore Gaming 🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Realme GT 7T | |
| Unboxing | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- OnePlus Nord CE 6 vs Samsung Galaxy A57
- Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco X8 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro
- Infinix GT 50 Pro vs oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Nothing Phone (4a) vs Samsung Galaxy A57
- Honor X9d vs Samsung Galaxy A57
- Oppo Reno 15 vs Samsung Galaxy A57
- Samsung Galaxy A57 vs Samsung Galaxy A56
- Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A57
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











