Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Vivo X200 FE
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 60 Ultra
- 4.0x better Camera (200 + 50 + 8 MP vs 50 + 50 + 8 MP)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 11% higher Charging Watts (100 W vs 90 W)
- 8% larger Battery (7000 mAH vs 6500 mAh)
- 7% bigger Screen Size (6.78 inch vs 6.31 inch)
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
- Flash: Dual-LED Flash
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- 56% higher Front Camera (50 MP vs 32 MP)
- 15% lighter Weight (186 g vs 220 grams)
- 15% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.3 M vs 2 M)
- 13% higher HBM Brightness (~1800 nits vs 1600 nits)
- 11% higher Peak Brightness (5000 nits vs 4500 nits)
- Variants Prices: 12 + 256 GB | ~₹52,000 | ~$530 12 + 5…
- Better Screen Type: LTPO Amoled vs AMOLED
- Better Processor: Dimensity 9300+ vs Dimensity 8400
- Front Flash: No
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 FE |
| Brand | infinix | Vivo |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 210000 PKR | 195000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹67000 | ₹55000 |
| Price USA | $690 | $560 |
| Variants Prices | — | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB 16 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.3 x 77.2 x 7.9 mm | 150.8 × 71.8 × 8.0 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.31 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1216 × 2640 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | LTPO Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 5000 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | ~1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 | Dimensity 9300+ |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.25 GHz | 1 × 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2 M | 2.3 M |
| Bootup Time | - | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256GB = 200,000 PKR | 67,000 INR | 690 $ | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 200 + 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16,320 × 12,240 Pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 200 MP = Samsung ISOCELL HPE 50 MP = Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | 50 MP= Sony IMX882 |
| Zoom | 3 X | 3 x |
| Digital Zoom | 100 x | 100 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | - |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | 50 MP=Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Front Resolution | 6,528 × 4,896 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 60 fps |
| Front Flash | - | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 7000 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 100 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | 10 W | Yes |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | - |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 50-60 mints ( 0-100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6877 | V2503 |
| Release Date | 1 March, 2026 | 5 July, 2025 |
| Year | 2027 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Note Series | Vivo X Series |
| Category | Uper Mid Range | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 220 grams | 186 g |
| Build | Aluminum ( Frame And Back) | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | Matrix notification light on the back | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | WiFi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅200MP main camera | ✅ Compact flagship body 📱 150.8×71.8×8mm, 186g |
| Cons | ❌No telephoto lens | ❌ No expandable storage 🗂️ no microSD card slot |
| Best For | ✅ Camera enthusiasts | 🎯 Compact phone lovers 🤏 |
| Not Best For | ❌Compact phone lovers | 🚫 MicroSD storage needs 🗂️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | OPPO Reno 15 Pro | Xiaomi 17T |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works