Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Vivo X200 FE
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- 39% higher Charging Watts (125 W vs 90 W)
- 33% more RAM Memory (16+1TB vs 12 + 512 GB)
- 28% higher Camera (64+50+50 MP vs 50 + 50 + 8 MP)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 6% bigger Screen Size (6.7 inch vs 6.31 inch)
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
- Flash: Dual-LED Flash
- IP Rating: ip 68
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- 2.0x better Peak Brightness (5000 nits vs 2500 nits)
- 53% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.3 M vs 1.5 M)
- 44% larger Battery (6500 mAh vs 4500 mAH)
- 20% higher HBM Brightness (~1800 nits vs 1500 nits)
- 13% higher Max Clock (3.4 GHz vs 3.0 GHz)
- 6% lighter Weight (186 g vs 197 g)
- Better Screen Type: LTPO Amoled vs P-OLED
- Better Processor: Dimensity 9300+ vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- Model Number: V2503
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 FE |
| Brand | Motorola | Vivo |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 170000 PKR | 195000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹55000 | ₹55000 |
| Price USA | $500 | $560 |
| Variants Prices | 16 + 512 GB = Unknown | 50,000 INR | Not Confirm | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB 16 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm | 150.8 × 71.8 × 8.0 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.7 inch | 6.31 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1220 x 2712 Pixels | 1216 × 2640 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | P-OLED | LTPO Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 2500 nits | 5000 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1500 nits | ~1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Dimensity 9300+ |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.0 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.0GHz | 1 × 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC8 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.5 M | 2.3 M |
| Bootup Time | 22s | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16+1TB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 16 + 512 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 64+50+50 MP | 50 + 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 Pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = OmniVision OV50H (Main) | 50 MP= Sony IMX882 |
| Zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Digital Zoom | 100 x | 100 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | - |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP =Samsung S5KJN1 | 50 MP=Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 60 | 4K @ 60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 4500 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 125 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | - | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | 10 W | Yes |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 12h 40m | - |
| Charging Time | 25 minutes (0% to 100%) | 50-60 mints ( 0-100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | - | V2503 |
| Release Date | 15 May, 2024 | 5 July, 2025 |
| Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Edge Series | Vivo X Series |
| Category | Mid-Premium Smartphone | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 14, up to 3 major OS updates | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 186 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Back Lather | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | ip 68 | — |
| Special Features | UWB support | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) | WiFi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4v | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz Display | ✅ Compact flagship body 📱 150.8×71.8×8mm, 186g |
| Cons | ❌ No 8K Video | ❌ No expandable storage 🗂️ no microSD card slot |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Compact phone lovers 🤏 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | 🚫 MicroSD storage needs 🗂️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Xiaomi 14T | Xiaomi 17T |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works