Vivo X200 FE vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- 2.0x better Charging Watts (90 W vs 45 W)
- 52% higher Peak Brightness (5000 nits vs 3300 nits)
- 48% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2.3 M vs 1.55 M)
- 25% larger Battery (6500 mAh vs 5200 mAh)
- 20% lighter Weight (186 g vs 232 g)
- 19% higher Front Camera (50 MP vs 42 MP)
- Better Screen Type: LTPO Amoled vs Amoled
- Better Processor: Dimensity 9300+ vs Google Tensor G5
- Includes Wireless Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- 67% higher Zoom (5 x vs 3 x)
- 33% more RAM Memory (16 + 1TB vs 12 + 512 GB)
- 25% smaller Lithography Process (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- 22% higher HBM Brightness (2200 nits vs ~1800 nits)
- 11% higher Max Clock (3.78 GHz vs 3.4 GHz)
- 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- 11% higher Screen Resolution (1344 x 2992 Pixels vs 1216 × 2640 Pixels)
- 8% bigger Screen Size (6.8 inch vs 6.31 inch)
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
- Higher Video Recording: 8K @ 30 fps 4k @ 60 fps 1080p @ 240 fps vs 4K @ 30/60 fps 1080p @ 30/60/120 fps
- Flash: Yes
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Vivo X200 FE | Google Pixel 10 Pro XL |
| Brand | Vivo | |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 195000 PKR | 370000🚫 PKR |
| Price India | ₹55000 | ₹114000 |
| Price USA | $560 | $1150 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB 16 + 512 GB | 16 + 256 GB 16 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 150.8 × 71.8 × 8.0 mm | 162.8 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.31 inch | 6.8 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1216 × 2640 Pixels | 1344 x 2992 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 5000 nits | 3300 nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~1800 nits | 2200 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9300+ | Google Tensor G5 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.78 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 × 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 | 1 x Cortex-X4 @ 3.78GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.3 M | 1.55 M |
| Bootup Time | Not Confirm | 10 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 512 GB | 16 + 1TB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256 GB | 16 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 48 + 48 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP= Sony IMX882 | 50 MP = Samsung GNV |
| Zoom | 3 x | 5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 100 x | 100 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 8K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | - | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 42 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Samsung S5KJN1 | 42 MP = Sony IMX858 |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 7483 × 5612 pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 60 fps | 4k @ 60 fps |
| Front Flash | No | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Li-ion |
| Wireless Charging | No | 25 W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | Yes | Not confirm |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 10h 30m |
| Charging Time | 50-60 mints ( 0-100%) | 50-60 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | V2503 | G45RY |
| Release Date | 5 July, 2025 | 28 August, 2025 |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Vivo X Series | Pixel Pro XL |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 Now | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 232 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 7 (802.11be) | WiFi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Compact flagship body 📱 150.8×71.8×8mm, 186g | ✅ 5x optical zoom 🔭 |
| Cons | ❌ No expandable storage 🗂️ no microSD card slot | ❌ Only 45W wired ⚡ |
| Best For | 🎯 Compact phone lovers 🤏 | 🎯 AI feature lovers 🤖 |
| Not Best For | 🚫 MicroSD storage needs 🗂️ | 🚫 Raw benchmark chasers 🚀 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Xiaomi 17T | Zte Redmagic 11 Pro |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works