Specs Don't Lie. Compare Now.
Put any two phones head-to-head and see the real winner — Display, Camera, Battery, Performance and Price, matched spec-for-spec so you can decide with facts, not marketing.
Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T
| Specification | Infinix Note 60 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 60 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T |
| Brand | infinix | Xiaomi |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 210000 | 218000 |
| Price India | 67000 | 64000 |
| Price USD | $690 | $670 |
| Price USA | 690 | 670 |
| Variants Prices | — | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.3 x 77.2 x 7.9 mm | 157.6 × 75.2 × 8.2/8.17 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.59 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1268 x 2756 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 nits | 2000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 | Dimensity 8500 Ultra |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.25 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.25 GHz | 1 x 3.4 GHz Cortex-A725 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G720 MC8 / MP8 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2 M | 2.4 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 18 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 +256GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256GB = 200,000 PKR | 67,000 INR | 690 $ | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 200 + 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 50 + 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16,320 × 12,240 Pixels | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 200 MP = Samsung ISOCELL HPE 50 MP = Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | 50 MP = Omnivision OV50 Light Fusion 800 |
| Zoom | 3 X | 5 x |
| Digital Zoom | 100 x | 120 x |
| Video Recording | 4K@30/60 fps | 4K@30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | – |
| Front Resolution | 6,528 × 4,896 Pixels | 6528 × 4896 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30 fps | 4K @ 30/60fps |
| Front Flash | - | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 7000 mAH | 6500 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 100 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 7.5 W | 22.5 W |
| Reverse Wireless | 10 W | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 14h 13m |
| Charging Time | 100% in 45-60 min | 70–80 minutes ( 0-100% ) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6877 | 2602DPT53G |
| Release Date | 1 March, 2026 | 28 May, 2026 |
| Year | 2027 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Note Series | Xiaomi Number |
| Category | Uper Mid Range | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 , XOS 17 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 220 grams | 200 grams |
| Build | Aluminum ( Frame And Back) | Plastic ( Frame And Back) |
| Special Features | Matrix notification light on the back | Leica lens tuning, color spectrum sensor, |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅200MP main camera | ✅ Versatile Cameras — 📸 50MP+12MP+50MP triple |
| Cons | ❌No telephoto lens | ❌ No Wireless Charging — 🔌 wired only |
| Best For | ✅ Camera enthusiasts | 🎯 Zoom Photographers — 🔭 5x periscope telephoto |
| Not Best For | ❌Compact phone lovers | 🚫 Wireless Charge Seekers — 🔌 not supported |
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about comparing phones on FSL Specs.
Just search and select any two phones from our database — the tool instantly lines up their specs side by side and highlights which device wins in each category, from display to battery.
Yes. Every spec is cross-verified across multiple trusted sources before it's published, and anything not officially confirmed by the brand is clearly labeled "Not Confirmed."
The tool is built for a clean two-phone, head-to-head comparison so the differences are easy to read at a glance, without a cluttered multi-column table.
We follow a strict multi-source research process, checking official brand listings alongside independent spec databases and lab-tested benchmarks before publishing any figure.
Unreleased or rumored phones may have some fields marked "Not Confirmed" until an official announcement — we'd rather flag uncertainty than guess and mislead you.
Absolutely — that's the whole point. Compare a Xiaomi against a Samsung, a Tecno against an iPhone, or anything else in our database, brand doesn't limit the matchup.
Where available, pricing is shown across multiple currencies so you can gauge value in your own market rather than relying on a single regional price.
Our editorial team regularly audits published spec pages and updates entries whenever new official information, price changes, or corrections come in.
It depends on your priorities — gamers should focus on processor and RAM, photographers on camera sensors, and everyday users on battery life and display quality. Our tool highlights all of them so nothing gets missed.
Yes — pick your current phone as one side of the comparison to see exactly what you'd gain or lose by switching to another model.
Completely free, with no sign-up required — compare as many phones as you like, whenever you like.
Yes — each row is visually marked to show the stronger value, and specs that are equal between both phones are grouped so you can spot real differences instantly.
Yes, each comparison generates its own shareable URL, so you can send an exact side-by-side matchup straight to a friend or group chat.
It means the brand hasn't officially confirmed that particular detail yet — we'd rather label it honestly than present a rumor as fact.
We verify every figure across multiple sources before publishing, we're upfront when something is unconfirmed, and we build every comparison around the belief that specs — not brand names — should decide your next phone.











